Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: MacBook vs. Dedicated GPU for LLM

news.ycombinator.com

71–76 of 76 posts

Re: Ask HN: MacBook vs. Dedicated GPU for LLM

#71
I wouldn't buy any Mac products for LLM usage. It's cheaper to just buy a subscription. You enjoy Mac for your personal/professional use. I have been running LLM on Mac, honestly for such an expensive machine I wouldn't want to use it for long runs just for a quick 30 minute usage. It heats up so much you can make an omelette on it. I would NOT want my dedicated MacBook run hot for long these things last forever. Fairly confident if I run LLM's all day long their life will be short lived. In my family my kids are still using their laptops which are papas handovers. I have an iMac from 2014 that my kids still use.

Re: Ask HN: MacBook vs. Dedicated GPU for LLM

#72
post #2

MacBooks with their unified memory behave like a slow GPU with enormous amount of video RAM. So you can run large smart models slowly. Dedicated GPUs have less video RAM so can run smaller less smart models quickly.

Unified memory is also a kicker for crashing a Mac.

Re: Ask HN: MacBook vs. Dedicated GPU for LLM

#75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Latest MBP goes up to 128GB of memory.

The M5 Max's GPU is slower than a single RTX 3090, though. Both machines will be stuck in the 30-50GB model range, but the 3090 would have faster token prefill and faster decode speeds (614GB/s on M5 Max vs 936GB/s on 1x 3090).

> Both machines will be stuck in the 30-50GB model range,

That is not true.

3090 is only 24GB.

It will absolutely outperform the M5 on models that will fit in that space, but M5 will outperform with larger models as the whole 128GB is GPU addressable.

Post reply on HN