71–75 of 75 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
> so you can't quantify what happens in west bank. something happens but it's not clear ?can you quantify expansion and land seizure ? over timeline. Can you ? This commentary in your comment is verging on sealioning. Please read the guidelines. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning > Sealioning (also sea-lioning and sea lioning) is a type of trolling or harassment…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Are you sealioning in this thread too? I just saw you doing it in the other thread. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45222886
asking simple question once is sealioning now ?
It is time-consuming and pointless to answer questions that are made in bad faith. I'm happy to answer if it's an actual question with intent to understand, not undermine. The answer is there in the comment. But the majority of your post history is just bad faith political campaigning.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
asking simple question once is sealioning now ?
Yes, that is textbook sealioning. This comment is sealioning too. It's when you pick the worst possible intepretation of the comment and repeat it in the most polite way possible. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning It is time-consuming and pointless to answer questions that are made in bad faith. I'm happy to answer if it's an actual question with intent to understand, not undermine. The answer is there in the…
and what you do also textbook sealioning. It's when you pick the worst possible intepretation of the comment and go with it. literally what you did.
there were no palestinian fractions in past decades that advocated for peace and two state solutions and got killed or displaced.
this is the core reason for you not been able to answering such a simple question and sailing away into "bad faith" and "sealioning" arguments.
i was under impression that this site encourages fact based discussion. fact based discussion typically requires facts. you have none.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, that is textbook sealioning. This comment is sealioning too. It's when you pick the worst possible intepretation of the comment and repeat it in the most polite way possible. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning It is time-consuming and pointless to answer questions that are made in bad faith. I'm happy to answer if it's an actual question with intent to understand, not undermine. The answer is there in the…
claiming that question was made in bad faith is good way to avoid answering question. and what you do also textbook sealioning. It's when you pick the worst possible intepretation of the comment and go with it. literally what you did. there were no palestinian fractions in past decades that advocated for peace and two state solutions and got killed or displaced. this is the core reason for you not been able to answer…
https://www.wikihow.com/Committing-to-the-Bit
This is what you sound like: