Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Is Linux for laptop worth the trouble?

news.ycombinator.com

71–75 of 75 posts

Re: Ask HN: Is Linux for laptop worth the trouble?

#71
post #26
post #22

Buy a used Thinkpad. Their compatibility is superb, as many major Linux vendors develop on them. Better to buy older higher-end models than spend the money on newer models. Buy the highest-end model you can afford. Don't use an ideologically-motivated distro that omits drivers and firmware because they are not Free enough. Use something fairly mainstream, like Ubuntu or Mint. Update its firmware before you install. S…

Not just Thinkpads work fine (Latitudes are also awesome), what you describe is wisdom from the 2000s. You can just use fwupd to have regular firmware updates, no need to keep Windows just for that. Wireless also works very nice, especially Intel. What can be tricky are fingerprint readers, but some have binary drivers.

> Latitudes are also awesome

They are OK, but no better than OK and definitely not awesome. IMHO, the build quality is inferior, the keyboards are inferior, the upgradability is inferior, and the pointing devices are inferior. I don't want gestures, but I very much want 3 mouse buttons: I middle-click things hundreds of times a day.

I have 2 Latitudes in my "fleet" but neither is a machine I especially like.

Re: Ask HN: Is Linux for laptop worth the trouble?

#72
post #63

I'm not seeing any fairly priced MacBooks in the Apple store. Are you referring to second hand laptops?

Macbook Air is 999$ 16G RAM and 256Gb. I think if you look at the competition you would be right about the same territory but with better battery, perf of M silicon chip. For that price I think it is really hard to beat Apple. But once you go on the upgrade from base config that is when it begins to stop making sense and look elsewhere.

I mean... 256Gb storage in 2025 sounds like a joke. I hate that they can get away with that

Re: Ask HN: Is Linux for laptop worth the trouble?

#74
post #69
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you you can single command in Linux, what prevented you to do the same on Macos? brew install and you should have been able to run the command in macos too.

That's a weird assumption. I am not talking about cd and grep I am talking about one of the thousands of tools available in any Linux repo. It's more likely to get it run on WSL than assuming it would just work on a Mac.

But could provide one of the thousand that you are having trouble running on MacOS? Genuinely curious despite my comment sounding like I am trying to defend MacOS.

Re: Ask HN: Is Linux for laptop worth the trouble?

#75
post #63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Macbook Air is 999$ 16G RAM and 256Gb. I think if you look at the competition you would be right about the same territory but with better battery, perf of M silicon chip. For that price I think it is really hard to beat Apple. But once you go on the upgrade from base config that is when it begins to stop making sense and look elsewhere.

I mean... 256Gb storage in 2025 sounds like a joke. I hate that they can get away with that

Yes I am with you on that one. Not supporting Apple by any means here but if your workflow is cloud based you could get away with 256. As a software dev. my work laptop sadly or surprisingly is 256 and I haven't hit the storage limit on it. No running any code locally everything is on a sandboxed dev. machine.
Post reply on HN