Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Suggestions to host 10TB data with a monthly +100TB bandwidth

news.ycombinator.com

71–80 of 199 posts

Re: Ask HN: Suggestions to host 10TB data with a monthly +100TB bandwidth

#71
post #52

It's impossible to answer this question without more information. What is the use profile of your system? How many clients, how often, what's the burst rate, what kind of reliability do you need? These all change the answer.

And what kind of latency is needed, what geo areas are involved? Budget? Engineers available?

Re: Ask HN: Suggestions to host 10TB data with a monthly +100TB bandwidth

#72
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Storage Boxes are even cheaper, 20 EUR (or less if you’re outside Europe) for 10TB + unlimited bandwidth.

If we are talking about serving files publicly I'd go with the €40 server for flexibility (the storage boxes are kind of limited), but still get a €20 Storage Box to have a backup of the data. Then add more servers as bandwidth and redundancy requires. But if splitting your traffic across multiple servers is possible you can also get the €20 storage box and put a couple Hetzner Cloud servers with a caching reverse pr…

> even if you factor in the cost of your time you should come out ahead

There is always the hidden cost of not spending time on activities that are core to your business (if this is indeed for a business) that would make multiples of the money CF costs you.

Re: Ask HN: Suggestions to host 10TB data with a monthly +100TB bandwidth

#75
post #70

If it's for internal use, I have had good results with Resilio Sync (formerly BitTorrent Sync). It's like Dropbox except peer to peer. So it's free, limited only by your client side storage. The catch is it's only peer to peer (unless they added a managed option), so at least one other peer must be online for sync to take place.

They don't really maintain the regular Sync client anymore, only the expensive enterprise Connect option. My wife and I used Resilio Sync for years, but had to migrate away, since it had bugs and issues with newer OS versions, but they didn't care to fix them. Let alone develop new features.

Re: Ask HN: Suggestions to host 10TB data with a monthly +100TB bandwidth

#76
post #65
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wasabi does not have any sort of unlimited bandwidth. In fact, they explicitly say that if your download exceeds 100TB/month your use case is not a good fit. https://wasabi.com/paygo-pricing-faq/#free-egress-policy

The 100TB was just an example. They don't want you using more bandwidth than your storage. If you're storing 500GB, then your bandwidth usage should be less than 500GB. Wasabi isn't meant for scenarios where you're going to be transferring more than you're storing.

> Wasabi isn't meant for scenarios where you're going to be transferring more than you're storing.

Which is basically a roundabout way of saying, they're offering storage for backups, not for content distribution.

Re: Ask HN: Suggestions to host 10TB data with a monthly +100TB bandwidth

#77

I would also like to ask everyone about suggestions for deep storage of personal data, media etc. 10TB with no need for access unless in case of emergency data loss. I'm currently using S3 intelligent tiering.

Glacier Deep Archive is exactly what you want for this, that would be something like $11/month ongoing, then about $90/TB in the event of retrieval download. Works well except for tiny (Note that there is Glacier and Glacier Deep Archive. The latter is cheaper but longer minimum storage periods. You can use it as a life cycle rule.

Re: Ask HN: Suggestions to host 10TB data with a monthly +100TB bandwidth

#79
post #74

People here suggest Hetzner. Just be aware that their routing is maybe not as good as you get for more expensive bandwidth.

Can you be more specific?

Hetzner has excellent connectivity: https://www.hetzner.com/unternehmen/rechenzentrum/ They are always working to increase their connectivity. I'd even go so far to claim that in many parts of the world they outperform certain hyperscalers.

Post reply on HN