Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Any recommendation for a good History of Science book?

news.ycombinator.com

71–80 of 95 posts

Re: Ask HN: Any recommendation for a good History of Science book?

#71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A seminal, perspective-shifting book, but not a general history of science. Also, one historian of science that I spoke to said it was a bit outdated now (as of ~10 years ago).

I'd be very interested in hearing about a more recent synthesis on the topic, if you know of one! A lot of the other suggestions in this thread seem to be more about science popularization than directly about philosophy of science.

In another comment, I pointed out the Open Syllabus Project, which collects and surveys college class syllabuses. There you can find what professors in the field think are the best and most important books, which may be the best recommendations you'll find.

https://blog.opensyllabus.org/about-the-open-syllabus-projec...

Re: Ask HN: Any recommendation for a good History of Science book?

#72
Anything by P J Bowler is worth a look. He and Morus wrote the first "textbook" on history of science. "Making Modern Science: A Historical Survey" - disclaimer I was their student when they were writing this.

Full bibliography here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_J._Bowler

Iwan Rhys Morus also has some good books on Faraday/Tesla and his own illustrated history of science and way back to his "Bodies/Machines" from 2002.

They take a general view that is cynical of the "revoluions" fallacy in historigraphical approaches to the history of sciences.

Re: Ask HN: Any recommendation for a good History of Science book?

#73
post #6

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas Kuhn

With the caveat that it has been well argued that "scientific revolutions" are an artefact of historical compression rather than real phenomenon that was experienced by participants in said "revolution"

Re: Ask HN: Any recommendation for a good History of Science book?

#75
post #68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The actual quote is "whether it actually exists is a matter for 21st century physics," so he was completely correct. It was, indeed, a matter for 21st century physics: the Higgs boson was proven to exist in 2012: about 9 years after the book was published.

To be fair, I didn’t say he was wrong, I said it’s out of date.

Well, you kind of made it sound like he was predicting it wouldn't be found for a century (though I suppose is he'd written the book just 4 years earlier, he'd then be right).

It actually goes into some detail about why the Higgs boson is important, it just says "it hasn't been found yet". If you fill in the epilogue of "the Higgs boson was found in 2012" yourself, those pages are still consistent, correct and useful.

It would really be out of date if the Higgs had been disproved, as it would have two pages of, essentially, a branch predictor failure.

Re: Ask HN: Any recommendation for a good History of Science book?

#78
Not a book but a podcast from Stephen Wolfram. Leaving it here in case it is useful.

1. A Brief History of Science with Stephen Wolfram - https://soundcloud.com/stephenwolfram/sets/a-brief-history-o...

2. A Very Brief History of Mathematics - https://soundcloud.com/stephenwolfram/a-very-brief-history-o...

3. An Informal History of Physics - https://soundcloud.com/stephenwolfram/history-of-physics

There maybe more here - https://soundcloud.com/stephenwolfram

Re: Ask HN: Any recommendation for a good History of Science book?

#80
post #6

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas Kuhn

With the caveat that it has been well argued that "scientific revolutions" are an artefact of historical compression rather than real phenomenon that was experienced by participants in said "revolution"

I'm pretty sure his conclusion was that new paradigms take hold by the previous generation dying/retiring. So I'm not sure how much compression that really is.
Post reply on HN