Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What weird or hard problems are you trying to solve?

news.ycombinator.com

601–610 of 831 posts

Re: Ask HN: What weird or hard problems are you trying to solve?

#601

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What's the difference between your approach and density-functional theory?

Density functional theory is still quantum mechanics, but operating on the expected electron density itself, rather than the many-body problem of all the electrons. It's pretty good, but not fast - around a CPU-minute for a medium-sized molecule. I'm working on approximating the electron density using just the nuclei positions and some neural networks. The throughput is tens of thousands of times higher than for DFT.…

Would you be able to leverage any of the work that's being done around so called "neural ODE's"?

The Julia community seems to be doing some really cool at the intersection of the 2 fields and it seems like it could be useful if you've already got some kind of pre-existing model/structure to hang the ML part off:

* https://julialang.org/blog/2019/01/fluxdiffeq/

* https://mitmath.github.io/18337/lecture15/diffeq_machine_lea...

Re: Ask HN: What weird or hard problems are you trying to solve?

#602
post #99

Automating cloud architecture creation. I'm building a "catalog" of architectures that you could use to create a complete cloud architecture on your AWS, GCP or Azure account in less than one minute. So, for example, you could create a docker-based architecture with CI/CD, auto-scaling, zero downtime deployment, SSL, load-balancing, high availability and MongoDB in less than one minute in your own AWS account. It's l…

Do you have something published yet? Code, articles or anything? Sounds very interesting!

Thanks! I've released an alpha version three days ago.

I'm not very comfortable using a comment for promotional purpose so if you would like to try it out, drop me an email at jje.levy@gmail.com, I will send you the link.

I will try to make a Show HN post in the following weeks.

Re: Ask HN: What weird or hard problems are you trying to solve?

#603

Automating cloud architecture creation. I'm building a "catalog" of architectures that you could use to create a complete cloud architecture on your AWS, GCP or Azure account in less than one minute. So, for example, you could create a docker-based architecture with CI/CD, auto-scaling, zero downtime deployment, SSL, load-balancing, high availability and MongoDB in less than one minute in your own AWS account. It's l…

Check out gruntwork.io

Gruntwork is very good to generate your infrastructure as code, but in my opinion it misses the "user-friendly" part.

What do you think about it?

Re: Ask HN: What weird or hard problems are you trying to solve?

#604

I’m working on a new way to talk online, with the goal of killing cancel culture, increasing understanding, and basically calming down current radicalization. Picture Reddit, but with the ability to anonymously share ideas with other people in your social circles. My theory is that most reasonable people stay off social media, so places like Twitter end up filled with unreasonable narcissists. At the same time, discu…

This never works because the people attracted to anonymous discussion with no ‘cancel culture’ (no banning/moderation?) ARE those who have been radicalized and would get banned for it anywhere else.

I think that even if it did attract those who would be banned anywhere else, it would not necessarily mean it is not working - depends how you define "working". I see the problem with cancel culture in suppressing legitimate but unpopular opinions and polarizing society by promoting echo-chamberization. I would love to have a place where opinions would be discussed and voted down not because people do not like them but because they can find arguments against them in rigorous debate. But how to set up the system in such a way that it would distinguish and push to the most visible place the best reasoned opinions and not the ones most liked, that is the hard problem.

Re: Ask HN: What weird or hard problems are you trying to solve?

#605

Let's solve Harmony! The first scientific experiment was conducted by 5th century BC Pythagoreans. They wanted to show that the basis for musical consonance was math. From that, they inferred that harmony in math accounted for the harmony of the cosmos. This integration of math+physics was very forward thinking. But, if we fast forward to the present, we still don't have a complete scientific explanation for the basi…

I got a little lost when you tried to compare musical harmony to societal harmony. With regards to musical harmony, is it possible that it's more or less random? I know multiple cultures have different definitions of musical harmony. I suspect the evolution of hearing also contains random elements. Similar to language, it's not so much about an inherent universality, just a universality we can all learn and agree on.…

This comparison is delved into in the sections in Ernest McClain's The Pythagorean Plato [1] which analyze Plato's Republic. McClain summarizes his somewhat remarkable claims thus:

> From a musician's perspective, Plato's Republic embodies a treatise on equal temperament. Temperament is a fundamental musical problem arising from the incommensurability of musical thirds, fifths, and octaves. The marriage allegory dramatizes the discrepancy between musical fifths and thirds as a genetic problem between children fathered by 3 and those fathered by 5. The tyrant's allegory dramatizes the discrepancy between fifths and octaves as that between powers of 3 and powers of 2. The myth of Er closes the Republic with the description of how the celestial harmony sung by the Sirens is actually tempered by the Fates, Lachesis, Clotho and Atropos, who must interfere with planetary orbits defined by integers in order to keep them perfectly coordinated. In Plato's ideal city, which the planets model, justice does not mean giving each man (men being symbolized by integers) “exactly what he is owed,” but rather moderating such demands in the interests of “what is best for the city” (412e). By the 16th century A.D., the new triadic style and the concomitant development of fretted and keyboard instruments transformed Plato's theoretical problems into pressing practical ones for musicians and instrument makers. With the adoption of equal temperament about the time of Bach we made into fact what for Plato had been merely theory. Musically the Republic was exactly two thousand years ahead of time.

It would be easier to dismiss McClain's thesis as Bible Code crackpottery if he didn't have such interesting things to say about the seemingly arbitrary numbers[2] appearing in Plato's writing.

For example, on 5040

> “Our songs have turned into laws!” Plato exclaims in one of his relentless puns in the dialogue Laws, this time on nomoi meaning both laws and traditional melodies for the recitation of the epics (799d). [...] The absolute population limit of 5,040 “landholders” will be analyzed as the tonal “index” of a tuning system “fathered” by four primes, 2, 3, 5, and 7; the number 5040 = 2^4 x 3^2 × 5 × 7 defines a tuning system like that of Plato's friend Archytas, who is the earliest theorist credited with using 7 as a tone generator. Since 5,040 is also factorial seven (7! = 1 × 2 × 3 × 4 × 5 × 6 × 7)—i.e., just 7 times larger than factorial six (6! = 720) which defines the calendar octave, or Poseidon and his ten sons (cf. fig. 6) — we have a clue as to the identity of Plato's 37 guardians, 18 from the “parent city” and 19 “new arrivals,” for new arrivals among Plato's products are those generated by 7. [...]

Or, again, when McClain points out the relation between the number 729 - in Plato: the "distance" between the happiness of a king and that of a tyrant - and the simplest expression of the ratio of the Pythagorean comma: 531441::524288 (531441 is the square of 729)

Looked at this way, Plato's conclusion in the republic, that a society is just when each member of it deviates from their own interests just sufficiently to optimize for the interests of the society as a whole, is intended to map onto a truism of music theory - that an instrument, say a modern piano, is optimally in tune when each of its individual notes deviates from its own true value by the small amount required to keep the instrument as a whole sounding good.

This idea is the basis of various tuning systems including the predominant modern system known as "equal temperament."

1: https://ernestmcclain.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/plato_opti...

2: see, e.g. https://mathworld.wolfram.com/PlatosNumbers.html

Re: Ask HN: What weird or hard problems are you trying to solve?

#607

Let's solve Harmony! The first scientific experiment was conducted by 5th century BC Pythagoreans. They wanted to show that the basis for musical consonance was math. From that, they inferred that harmony in math accounted for the harmony of the cosmos. This integration of math+physics was very forward thinking. But, if we fast forward to the present, we still don't have a complete scientific explanation for the basi…

Regards Plato, I'm curious if you've looked at Ernest McClain's book The Pythagorean Plato? (See my other comment[1] here for some details if not.)

1: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23746057

Re: Ask HN: What weird or hard problems are you trying to solve?

#608
post #597

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This never works because the people attracted to anonymous discussion with no ‘cancel culture’ (no banning/moderation?) ARE those who have been radicalized and would get banned for it anywhere else.

Or maybe it's just people who want to hear alternative opinions that have been banned from the other heavily moderated platforms.

Opinions like what? The only opinions people get banned for are ones which seem openly racist, homophobic, etc. Nobody gets banned for having or encouraging alternative opinions about, like, which Java framework is the best. Not even for more controversial arguments like whether God exists (at least as far as I’m aware.) Therefore the only ‘rational debate’ that will take place is between what most people would call racists, homophobes, etc. Nobody else is going to want to post in or even look at such an environment, so it rapidly turns into a completely worthless bigoted echo chamber where everyone’s patting themselves on the back for having such enlightened alternative opinions.

Re: Ask HN: What weird or hard problems are you trying to solve?

#609

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This has a big flaw. If the future visitors copy all passwords to a usb stick and take it with them then anyone in the present time that gets a copy can pretend to be from the future. Worse still, everyone would believe the phoney future visitors without question.

I'm pretty sure no-one from the future will have a way to plug his/hers mini-USB-XC or whatever the usb name will be at the time in the future (USB standards are just a mess).

True. They would need to burn to a CD :-D

Re: Ask HN: What weird or hard problems are you trying to solve?

#610

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This has a big flaw. If the future visitors copy all passwords to a usb stick and take it with them then anyone in the present time that gets a copy can pretend to be from the future. Worse still, everyone would believe the phoney future visitors without question.

It would be good enough to know that there is at least one person somewhere who is actually from the future.

Yes but on that case the earlier suggestion of just asking them for a stock market prediction would be good enough without implementing the password system.
Post reply on HN