Changed my way of understanding what engineering is. Read the chaoter on designing cathedrals without math, science or modelling.
Ask HN: Good books on philosophy of engineering?
61–70 of 140 posts
Re: Ask HN: Good books on philosophy of engineering?
#62- Doing things as simply as possible to start off
- Keeping iteration time to a minimum, for maximum exploration of ideas
- Being willing to think outside the box
My takeaways above, hardly do these books justice, but they are as follows:
- Skunk Works: A Personal Memoir of My Years at Lockheed [0]
- Hackers: Heroes of the Computer Revolution. [1]
- The Dream Machine: J.C.R. Licklider and the Revolution That Made Computing Personal [2]
[0]: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/101438.Skunk_Works
[1]: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/56829.Hackers
[2]: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/722412.The_Dream_Machine
Re: Ask HN: Good books on philosophy of engineering?
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
Discussed most recently/productively here at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37686713 I think.
This very thread inspired me to read not only this book, but also this particular translation.
Re: Ask HN: Good books on philosophy of engineering?
#64Engineers (and scientists) often boast ourselves as master of causality. We solve problem by understanding the domain. We laugh people as cargo-culting - not knowing why one does things. The Secret of Our Success shows it is a feature rather than a bug. The effect of "culture" takes much longer to manifest, often beyond our comprehension. One example given by the book is how we process cassava, lots of superfluous ritual. Without those processing culture, people get poisoned slowly. Only with modern chemistry do we comprehend the full extend of those ritual. But people have been eating cassava way before modern science were available. Similar can be said about medicine, lots of folk remedies don't work. But when they do, they do. Is not understanding a feature or a bug?
With the advent of LLM, things seem to come in full cycle. We now prompt the engine and get a result/an opinion of sort. No longer is understanding required. I see the use of LLM in software engineering very anti-engineering, hindrance to learning and understanding. But it might not be a bug after all.
Re: Ask HN: Good books on philosophy of engineering?
#65Re: Ask HN: Good books on philosophy of engineering?
#66Earlier quoted context omitted.
Did you read the whole book yourself or just skim it? (asking sincerely)
I read the book completely. The book was on a second year reading list for my industrial design department. I absorbed as an introduction to the philosophical aspects of quality. Quality is truly a tough concept if approached as a universal truth.
Re: Ask HN: Good books on philosophy of engineering?
#67Re: Ask HN: Good books on philosophy of engineering?
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
There are several ways to approach the Tao Te Ching, including the mystical, but I think that there's a great book that explains the underlying approach the Chinese have, called, Treatise on Efficacy. Essentially, in Chinese philosophy, any given situation has a propensity (water tends to run downhill). It is therefore more effective to work with that propensity, than it is to work heroically against that propensity.…
> Essentially, in Chinese philosophy, any given situation has a propensity (water tends to run downhill). It is therefore more effective to work with that propensity, than it is to work heroically against that propensity. Interesting, this is similar to the Hindu/Indic idea of dharma (e.g. the dharma of water is to flow) and the idea of working with/towards dharma (both of oneself and the world generally). (Dharma re…
The Chinese word for this propensity of the situation is shi (勢), rather than dao (道). There are other texts that talk about exploiting and profiting from propensity (shi), rather than what the Dao De Jing talks about with wei wuwei (為無為).
Re: Ask HN: Good books on philosophy of engineering?
#69"Philosophy of Technology" in general is a pretty rich field with a long history, and you might find more references in it than in engineering specifically.
Re: Ask HN: Good books on philosophy of engineering?
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
This very thread inspired me to read not only this book, but also this particular translation.
Read through the thread and didn't see references to the translation by Derek Lin, could you point to why you selected that version?