Earlier quoted context omitted.
Absolutely. China has a very public long standing policy of engaing in global economic colonialism via its "one belt | one road | silk road 2" strategy. China having less(?) to do with the USofA in no way translates to China withdrawing from the world - rumour has it there are many other countries other than the US.
The US is the largest and wealthiest economy in the world. I don't think China will be able to simply swap out the US for Kazakhstan and these other 1B1R countries and throw in the towel. In fact, I just recently read that China is overhauling the entire program due to various failures: https://www.wsj.com/articles/china-belt-road-debt-1166396163...
For now, imagine what a Trump second term might achieve, particularly given the real life example of Truss in the UK:
> The past six weeks have been not so much a cautionary tale as much as a textbook example of what happens when political ideologues are let off the leash, allowed to shut out anyone with opposing views and given the keys to the kingdom
( Rob Harris, Sydney Morning Herald )
Your linked WSJ article indicates that China's plans are coming to roost sooner rather than later:
> ... have left countries struggling to repay their debts to China.
as this is pretty much the point of economic colonialism, just as the British once ended up with Hong Kong as an outpost for a century so too will China end up with a ring of outposts spanning the globe for a century forward, ideal for those distributed ground stations for its space programs coupled with duty free ports for trade.