Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Who is the most positive impactful person you know?

news.ycombinator.com

61–70 of 83 posts

Re: Ask HN: Who is the most positive impactful person you know?

#62

Elon Musk

This will be a controversial answer for some reasons I think are misplaced. In my opinion Elon Musk seems like he has a potent toxic side to his personality, and he doesn't seem to have a very good grasp of certain things. He also legitimately seems delusional at times. However in terms of bringing awareness, optimism, and a willingness to actively work on engineering solutions to long-term existential threats to hum…

If someone has a historical record of making delusions become reality, then I think they aren't really delusional.

Re: Ask HN: Who is the most positive impactful person you know?

#68
post #15

Leonard Susskind, a theoritical physicist at Stanford. He has open, free video lectures that cover an entire 4 year cirruculum of a physics degree in his personal website called Theoritical Minimum.

Yep, he has an extremely charming personality judging from his videos. Something similar is about Robert Sapolski, also from Stanford. Love watching these guys lecture. Natural born teachers.

I suspect our Youtube accounts are doppelgangers. o/

Re: Ask HN: Who is the most positive impactful person you know?

#69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is a 'brave' answer...

It's a fine answer. He spends his time railing against Marxism, Postmodernism, SJW culture and telling people to take responsibility. His main messages seem to boil down to become resilient and don't destroy the world.

He's helped me to become resilient too ... resilient to the pseudo intellectual BS he peddles.

Re: Ask HN: Who is the most positive impactful person you know?

#70
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's a fine answer. He spends his time railing against Marxism, Postmodernism, SJW culture and telling people to take responsibility. His main messages seem to boil down to become resilient and don't destroy the world.

He's helped me to become resilient too ... resilient to the pseudo intellectual BS he peddles.

I've noticed this really interesting phenomenon when people disagree with or dislike someone in academia to label them as a psuedo intellectual.

This happens for people on both sides of the divide. Look at the comments on any potentially controversial academic discussion and the phrase pseudo intellectual comes up an awful lot.

Now, I can't imagine both sides of a debate contain only psuedo intellectuals. Nor can I reasonably say I think the entire of Academia is filled with only so-called psuedo intellectuals.

So how do you delineate who is an actual intellectual vs. who is a psuedo intellectual?

What is your criteria? What is the criteria in general?

Anyone?

Because it seems to me this phenomenon manifests when people either disagree with or dislike an academics conclusions. As such I completely discount the opinion of anyone willing to use the phrase psuedo intellectual.

Post reply on HN