Earlier quoted context omitted.
> they can daisy-chain the purchase of multiple properties. They take the first cheonsae deposit and use it to purchase another property And then they have to return the deposit eventually... how is this different from a Ponzi scheme? :P
With a ponzi scheme, there is no underlying investment. So the pool of capital never grows. This Korean system should work in theory. People generally don't move very frequently. As long as there's a liquid market for investments in stocks & bonds, and the housing appreciates in value over the long term, it's not a bad system. Seems pretty favorable to the landlords too. They get $90k up front for a $100k house. Whic…
The "pool of capital" never grows here, either. Landlords get more assets (houses), but also more liabilities (deposits).
A Ponzi scheme is perfectly capable of having underlying investments, by the way. I'm pretty sure Madoff bought houses with his money, too.
> Which they could invest for an 8% or so return
Where the heck do you get an 8% return with no risk? I want in.
> The fact that is has been around for so long
How many decades did Madoff's ponzi scheme last?