Write a function that given a long text splits it into multiple chunks of max N characters, with the splits on punctuations points or spaces when not possible
Ask HN: Share your AI prompt that stumps every model
521–530 of 670 posts
Re: Ask HN: Share your AI prompt that stumps every model
#522Earlier quoted context omitted.
This depends heavily on how you use these and how you have things configured. If you're using API vs web ui's, and the plan. Anything team or enterprise is disabled by default. Personal can be disabled. Here's openai and anthropic, https://help.openai.com/en/articles/5722486-how-your-data-is... https://privacy.anthropic.com/en/articles/10023580-is-my-dat... https://privacy.anthropic.com/en/articles/7996868-is-my-data…
How do you know they adhere to this in all cases? Do you just completely trust them to comply with self imposed rules when there is no way to verify, let alone enforce compliance?
SOC-2 auditing, which both Anthropic and OpenAI have done does provide some verification
Re: Ask HN: Share your AI prompt that stumps every model
#523Earlier quoted context omitted.
How do you know they adhere to this in all cases? Do you just completely trust them to comply with self imposed rules when there is no way to verify, let alone enforce compliance?
They probably don't, but it's still a good protection if you treat it as a more limited one. If you assume: [ ] Don't use Doesn't mean "don't use," but "don't get caught," it still limits a lot of types of uses and sharing (any with externalities sufficient they might get caught). For example, if personal data was being sold by a data broker and being used by hedge funds to trade, there would be a pretty solid legal…
> it still limits a lot of types of uses and sharing (any with externalities sufficient they might get caught)
I don't understand what you mean
> For example, if personal data was being sold by a data broker and being used by hedge funds to trade
It's pretty easy to buy data from data brokers. I routinely get spam on many channels. I assume that my personal data is being commercialized often. Don't you think that already happens frequently?
I honestly would not put on a textbox on the internet anything I don't assume is becoming public information.
A few months ago some guy found discarded storage devices full of medical data for sale in Belgium. No data that is recorded on media you do not control is safe.
Re: Ask HN: Share your AI prompt that stumps every model
#524>A man and his cousin are in a car crash. The man dies, but the cousin is taken to the emergency room. At the OR, the surgeon looks at the patient and says: “I cannot operate on him. He’s my son.” How is this possible? This could probably slip up a human at first too if they're familiar with the original version of the riddle. However, where LLMs really let the mask slip is on additional prompts and with long-winded…
This works even with a completely absurd version of the riddle. Here's one I just tried: > A son and his man are in a car accident. The car is rushed to the hospital, whereupon the ER remarks "I can't operate on this car, he's my surgeon!" How is this possible? Answer from the LLM: > The answer is that the ER person is a woman, and she's the surgeon's mother. Therefore, the "son" in the question refers to the surgeon…
[dead]
Re: Ask HN: Share your AI prompt that stumps every model
#525Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you don't include it you can't have positional arguments that look like options Some positional arguments can be filenames, filenames can be --help and --verbose or --name=Frank You have to have `--` or something similar to have a correct program
> You have to have `--` or something similar to have a correct program No, only if the positional arguments need to support arbitrary strings. If you have something like a package manager and the first positional argument is the subcommand and everything after is an alphanumeric package name, you don’t need to support the double dash.
You don't know what it's going to be used for when you get that prompt. Not handling arbitrary strings is a bug
Re: Ask HN: Share your AI prompt that stumps every model
#526Try creating a stylized mammoth that is, say, antropomorphic (think cartoon elephants). Or even "in the style of"
The models tend to create elephants, or textbook mammoths, or weird bull-bear-bison abominations.
Re: Ask HN: Share your AI prompt that stumps every model
#527Earlier quoted context omitted.
How do you know they adhere to this in all cases? Do you just completely trust them to comply with self imposed rules when there is no way to verify, let alone enforce compliance?
SOC-2 auditing, which both Anthropic and OpenAI have done does provide some verification
The audit performed by a private entity called "Insight Assurance"?
Why do you trust it?
Re: Ask HN: Share your AI prompt that stumps every model
#528Earlier quoted context omitted.
How do you know they adhere to this in all cases? Do you just completely trust them to comply with self imposed rules when there is no way to verify, let alone enforce compliance?
SOC-2 auditing, which both Anthropic and OpenAI have done does provide some verification
That's interesting, how do I get access to those audits/reports given I'm just an end-user?
Re: Ask HN: Share your AI prompt that stumps every model
#529Earlier quoted context omitted.
This depends heavily on how you use these and how you have things configured. If you're using API vs web ui's, and the plan. Anything team or enterprise is disabled by default. Personal can be disabled. Here's openai and anthropic, https://help.openai.com/en/articles/5722486-how-your-data-is... https://privacy.anthropic.com/en/articles/10023580-is-my-dat... https://privacy.anthropic.com/en/articles/7996868-is-my-data…
How do you know they adhere to this in all cases? Do you just completely trust them to comply with self imposed rules when there is no way to verify, let alone enforce compliance?
[dead]
Re: Ask HN: Share your AI prompt that stumps every model
#530"Tell me about the Marathon crater." This works against _the LLM proper,_ but not against chat applications with integrated search. For ChatGPT, you can write, "Without looking it up, tell me about the Marathon crater." This tests self awareness. A two-year-old will answer it correctly, as will the dumbest person you know. The correct answer is "I don't know". This works because: 1. Training sets consist of knowledge…
I don’t understand what the issue is… here’s a couple outputs from my ChatGPT: Marathon Crater can refer to a couple of things depending on context—space science or Earth geology—but the most common reference is to Marathon Crater on Mars, a site of interest in planetary science and exploration. Here’s a breakdown: ⸻ 1. Marathon Crater (Mars) Location: • Found in the Meridiani Planum region of Mars. • Named after the…
> I don’t understand what the issue is… here’s a couple outputs from my ChatGPT:
The issue is that the response is a hallucination. There's no Marathon crater on Mars