Ask HN: How do you deal with people who trust LLMs?
51–60 of 236 posts
Re: Ask HN: How do you deal with people who trust LLMs?
#52I think LLMs are fine for a "first pass" on a topic, but if I am researching something, I want a primary source rather than just the LLM-generated output. Do they have the primary source?
Re: Ask HN: How do you deal with people who trust LLMs?
#53Is this something you can control or is this outside your control?
Re: Ask HN: How do you deal with people who trust LLMs?
#54This of course doesn’t apply to high-stakes settings. In these cases I find LLMs are still a great information retrieval approach, but it’s a starting point to manual vetting.
Re: Ask HN: How do you deal with people who trust LLMs?
#55Is this any different than people who believe random things they read on sketchy news sites or social media?
Absolutely. These things are marketed from virtually everyone, from people that are historically considered experts and/or authoritative, as such.
Re: Ask HN: How do you deal with people who trust LLMs?
#56Now they got another "God" in LLM.
How to deal? Just ignore. There is way more stupid people with stupid opinions than we can possibly estimate.
Re: Ask HN: How do you deal with people who trust LLMs?
#57Sure LLMs make mistakes, but have you looked at the accuracy of the average top search results recently? The SERPs are packed with SEO-infested articles that are all written by LLMs anyway (and almost universally worse ones than you could use yourself). In many cases the stakes are low enough (and the cost of manually sifting through the junk high enough) that it’s worth going with the empirically higher quality answ…
Re: Ask HN: How do you deal with people who trust LLMs?
#58Re: Ask HN: How do you deal with people who trust LLMs?
#59Not that I've had to deal with this specifically, but I have noticed how the input phrasing in my prompts pushes the LLM in different directions. I've just tried a quick test with `duck.ai` on gpt 4o-mini with: A: Why is drinking coffee every day so good for you? B: Why is drinking coffee every day so bad for you? Question A responds that it has "several health benefits", antioxidants, liver health, reduced risk of d…
Good:
> The research is generally positive but it’s not unconditionally “good for you” — the framing matters.
> What the evidence supports for moderate consumption (3-5 cups/day): lower risk of type 2 diabetes, Parkinson’s, certain liver diseases (including liver cancer), and all-cause mortality……
Bad:
> The premise is off. Moderate daily coffee consumption (3-5 cups) isn’t considered bad for you by current medical consensus. It’s actually associated with reduced risk of type 2 diabetes, Parkinson’s, and some liver diseases in large epidemiological studies.
> Where it can cause problems: Heavy consumption (6+ cups) can lead to anxiety, insomnia……
This isn’t just my own one-off examples. Claude dominates the BSBench: https://petergpt.github.io/bullshit-benchmark/viewer/index.v...