What are folks motivation for using local coding models? Is it privacy and there's no cloud host you trust? I love local models for some use cases. However for coding there is a big gap between the quality of models you can run at home and those you can't (at least on hardware I can afford) like GLM 4.6, Sonnet 4.5, Codex 5, Qwen Coder 408. What makes local coding models compelling?
Ask HN: Who uses open LLMs and coding assistants locally? Share setup and laptop
51–60 of 196 posts
Re: Ask HN: Who uses open LLMs and coding assistants locally? Share setup and laptop
#52I just got a AMD AI 9 HX 370 with 128GB RAM from laptopwithlinux.com and I've started using zed + ollama. I'm super happy with the machine and the service. Here's my ollama config: https://github.com/woile/nix-config/blob/main/hosts/aconcagu... I'm not an AI power user. I like to code, and I like the AI to autocomplete snippets that are "logical", I don't use agents, and for that, it's good enough.
Re: Ask HN: Who uses open LLMs and coding assistants locally? Share setup and laptop
#53Here's the pull request I made to Aider for using local models:
Re: Ask HN: Who uses open LLMs and coding assistants locally? Share setup and laptop
#54- auto git commit message
- auto jira ticket creation from git diff
Re: Ask HN: Who uses open LLMs and coding assistants locally? Share setup and laptop
#55What are folks motivation for using local coding models? Is it privacy and there's no cloud host you trust? I love local models for some use cases. However for coding there is a big gap between the quality of models you can run at home and those you can't (at least on hardware I can afford) like GLM 4.6, Sonnet 4.5, Codex 5, Qwen Coder 408. What makes local coding models compelling?
Anyone could chime in! I just want to have working local model that is at least as good as Sonnet 4.5, or 3.x.
Re: Ask HN: Who uses open LLMs and coding assistants locally? Share setup and laptop
#56What are folks motivation for using local coding models? Is it privacy and there's no cloud host you trust? I love local models for some use cases. However for coding there is a big gap between the quality of models you can run at home and those you can't (at least on hardware I can afford) like GLM 4.6, Sonnet 4.5, Codex 5, Qwen Coder 408. What makes local coding models compelling?
Zero trust in remote systems run by others with unknowable or questionable motives.
But really no host you trust to not keep data? Big tech with no-log guarantees and contractual liability? Companies with no-log guarantees and clear inference business model to protect like Together/Fireworks? Motives seem aligned.
I'd run locally if I could without compromise. But the gap from GLM 4.5 Air to GLM 4.6 is huge for productivity.
Re: Ask HN: Who uses open LLMs and coding assistants locally? Share setup and laptop
#57I sometimes still code with a local LLM but can't imagine doing it on a laptop. I have a server that has GPUs and runs llama.cpp behind llama-swap (letting me switch between models quickly). The best local coding setup I've been able to do so far is using Aider with gpt-oss-120b. I guess you could get a Ryzen AI Max+ with 128GB RAM to try and do that locally but non-nVidia hardware is incredibly slow for coding usage…
I ran this on an i7 with 64gb of RAM and an old nvidia card with 8g of vram.
EDIT: Forgot to say what the RAG system was doing which was answering a 50 question multiple choice test about GCP and cloud engineering.
Re: Ask HN: Who uses open LLMs and coding assistants locally? Share setup and laptop
#58What are folks motivation for using local coding models? Is it privacy and there's no cloud host you trust? I love local models for some use cases. However for coding there is a big gap between the quality of models you can run at home and those you can't (at least on hardware I can afford) like GLM 4.6, Sonnet 4.5, Codex 5, Qwen Coder 408. What makes local coding models compelling?
What setup would you (or other people) recommend for a local model, and which model, if I want something like Claude Sonnet 4.5 (or actually, earlier versions, which seemed to be better)? Anyone could chime in! I just want to have working local model that is at least as good as Sonnet 4.5, or 3.x.
Re: Ask HN: Who uses open LLMs and coding assistants locally? Share setup and laptop
#59What are folks motivation for using local coding models? Is it privacy and there's no cloud host you trust? I love local models for some use cases. However for coding there is a big gap between the quality of models you can run at home and those you can't (at least on hardware I can afford) like GLM 4.6, Sonnet 4.5, Codex 5, Qwen Coder 408. What makes local coding models compelling?
Zero trust in remote systems run by others with unknowable or questionable motives.
This all day long.
Plus I like to see what can be done without relying on big tech (relying on someone to create an LLM that I can use, notwithstanding).
Re: Ask HN: Who uses open LLMs and coding assistants locally? Share setup and laptop
#60Models gpt-oss-120b, Meta Llama 3.2, or Gemma (just depends on what I’m doing) Hardware - Apple M4 Max (128 GB RAM) paired with a GPD Win 4 running Ubuntu 24.04 over USB-C networking Software - Claude Code - RA.Aid - llama.cpp For CUDA computing, I use an older NVIDIA RTX 2080 in an old System76 workstation. Process I create a good INSTRUCTIONS.md for Claude/Raid that specifies a task & production process with a task…