Earlier quoted context omitted.
5 hours seems a lot worse than the ~10 hours I get on my M4 Air.
I get like 3 hours on my MBP when I use it. MacBooks have better runtime only when they are mostly idle, not when you fully load them.
Ask HN: Why hasn't x86 caught up with Apple M series?
51–60 of 640 posts
Re: Ask HN: Why hasn't x86 caught up with Apple M series?
#52If you're willing to spend a bunch of die area (which directly translates into cost) you can get good numbers on the other two legs of the Power-Performance-Area triangle. The issue is that the market position of Apple's competitors is such that it doesn't make as much sense for them to make such big and expensive chips (particularly CPU cores) in a mobile-friendly power envelope.
Re: Ask HN: Why hasn't x86 caught up with Apple M series?
#53RISC vs CISC. Why you think a mainframe is so fast? ARM is great. Those M are the only thing I could buy used and put Linux on it.
Re: Ask HN: Why hasn't x86 caught up with Apple M series?
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
Go down the rabbit hole of broken compiler settings for debian default builds, if you want to see how much low-hanging fruit we still have. Who here would be interested in testing a distro like debian with builds optimized for the Framework devices?
Should .. should I install gentoo?
Re: Ask HN: Why hasn't x86 caught up with Apple M series?
#55I considered getting a personal MBP (I have an M3 from work), but picked up a Framework 13 with the AMD 7 7840U. I have Pop!_OS on it, and while it isn't quite as impressive as the MBP, it is radically better than other Windows / Linux laptops I have used lately, battery life is quite good, ~5hr or so, not quite on par with the MBP but still good enough that I don't really have any complaints (and being able to up up…
5 hours seems a lot worse than the ~10 hours I get on my M4 Air.
Re: Ask HN: Why hasn't x86 caught up with Apple M series?
#56I’ve been thinking a lot about getting something from Framework, as I like their ethos around relatability. However, I currently have an M1 Pro which works just fine, so I’ve been kicking the can down the road while worrying that it just won’t be up to par in terms of what I’m used to from Apple. Not just the processor, but everything. Even in the Intel Mac days, I ended up buying a Asus Zephyrus G14, which had nothi…
Yeah, those glossy mirror-like displays in which you see yourself much better than the displayed content are polished really well
Re: Ask HN: Why hasn't x86 caught up with Apple M series?
#57RISC vs CISC. Why you think a mainframe is so fast? ARM is great. Those M are the only thing I could buy used and put Linux on it.
I thought people stopped believing this around 2005 when Apple users finally had to admit that PPC was behind x86. Even though this was the case for the most part during the entire history of PPC Macs (I owned two during these years) https://chipsandcheese.com/p/arm-or-x86-isa-doesnt-matter
Re: Ask HN: Why hasn't x86 caught up with Apple M series?
#58I’ve been thinking a lot about getting something from Framework, as I like their ethos around relatability. However, I currently have an M1 Pro which works just fine, so I’ve been kicking the can down the road while worrying that it just won’t be up to par in terms of what I’m used to from Apple. Not just the processor, but everything. Even in the Intel Mac days, I ended up buying a Asus Zephyrus G14, which had nothi…
Hah, it's exactly the other way around for me; I can't stand Apple's hardware. But then again I never bought anything Asus... let alone gamer laptops.
Re: Ask HN: Why hasn't x86 caught up with Apple M series?
#59I’ve been thinking a lot about getting something from Framework, as I like their ethos around relatability. However, I currently have an M1 Pro which works just fine, so I’ve been kicking the can down the road while worrying that it just won’t be up to par in terms of what I’m used to from Apple. Not just the processor, but everything. Even in the Intel Mac days, I ended up buying a Asus Zephyrus G14, which had nothi…
> There is a level of polish Yeah, those glossy mirror-like displays in which you see yourself much better than the displayed content are polished really well
I’ll take the apple display any day. It’s bright enough to blast through any reflections.
Re: Ask HN: Why hasn't x86 caught up with Apple M series?
#60The cost is flexibility and I think for now they don't want to move to fixed RAM configurations. The X3D approach from AMD gets a good bunch of the benefits by just putting lots of cache on board.
Apple got a lot of performance out of not a lot of watts.
One other possibility on power saving is the way Apple ramps the clockspeed. Its quite slow to increase from its 1Ghz idle to 3.2Ghz, about 100ms and it doesn't even start for 40ms. With tiny little bursts of activity like web browsing and such this slow transition likely saves a lot of power at a cost of absolute responsiveness.