Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: I'm interested in so many disciplines, but what can I do with that?

news.ycombinator.com

51–60 of 325 posts

Re: Ask HN: I'm interested in so many disciplines, but what can I do with that?

#51
If you find something that works for you that lets you create artifacts of your interests, go for it! You never know what people will latch on to.

I also have a lot of unrelated interests and ideas for projects I lack the depth to get off the ground.

The real breakthrough for me occurred while I was using Minecraft to practice improvisational comedy on YouTube and realized that I can take any infeasible idea that would never happen like "What if I gave a $40k speech to Goldman Sachs?" and added "... in Minecraft?" to it.

I made a lot of videos people didn't get for about a decade, and now I quit my day job as a LAMP dev and make most of my living off tips from viewers.

Best of luck!

Re: Ask HN: I'm interested in so many disciplines, but what can I do with that?

#52
I am just like you. Im 40 now and spent my career so far bouncing around different jobs, getting a real high off learning the “why” of everything. Love just connecting dots. Trade stocks. You get to dig deep into economics, sectors, products, strategy and human psychology. Its never ending and you will get great satisfaction if you are good. Piece everything together and you win money

Re: Ask HN: I'm interested in so many disciplines, but what can I do with that?

#53
Forget about all the topics you mentioned and study philosophy. It encompasses all of them so in a way you're studying multiple disciplines, ie. have your cake and eat it too. Second, philosophy can go wherever you want it to go, where as in the other fields you mentioned there is a high level of dogmatic norms that you have to stick to if you want to be published or rise to any sort of prominence. Third, social sciences, economics and the like are fields that want to do empirical science and copy physics, but fail at it miserably.

Often a Noble prize in economics detracts from the world instead of adding to it.

Re: Ask HN: I'm interested in so many disciplines, but what can I do with that?

#54
post #41

I have a similar pattern and decided, maybe instead of trying to fight it, I should turn it into a strength. Build around it https://rigelblu.com . David Perell's dime video was the final clue I needed — pick your center and just go https://youtu.be/gRDopONrnHE Happy to chat if it helps. Who knows, maybe you could help me. I’m relearning software engineering now after being out of it since school (2004).

To give you an example of the similarties. I've been learning writing, storytelling, and storyboarding over the last year. Even practiced sketching so I could do storyboards.

More recently, AI, software engineering, business strategy, and a tiny bit of marketing, data science, and venture capital.

The other thing that helps is that I always try to have a showable/shippable output. Nothing that's just in my head or scattered notes that wouldn't make sense to others.

A fav quotes, "The reason you want to be creative is because you consume every day. To balance out your energy, you also need to create every day." and “Don’t tell me. Show me!”

Re: Ask HN: I'm interested in so many disciplines, but what can I do with that?

#55

If you find something that works for you that lets you create artifacts of your interests, go for it! You never know what people will latch on to. I also have a lot of unrelated interests and ideas for projects I lack the depth to get off the ground. The real breakthrough for me occurred while I was using Minecraft to practice improvisational comedy on YouTube and realized that I can take any infeasible idea that wou…

Wow. I need to know you.

Links please, but would actually like to know who you are.

Re: Ask HN: I'm interested in so many disciplines, but what can I do with that?

#56
Make sure to condense your learning in some sort of PKM system [1]. I think having many interests is a strength many people don’t have. The risk of this trait, though, is to have all your entry points to these newly-found subjects scattered and unconnected, leaving you with a sense of not understanding any of these subjects.

[1] I would personally recommend Obsidian as a tool; check out this recent discussion on the PARA methodology https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30916260

Re: Ask HN: I'm interested in so many disciplines, but what can I do with that?

#57
> What does one do with an intellectual life other than swimming through intellectual content?

I've found myself in a similar point in life (currently 29). When I was young, everyone encouraged me to learn, and I think I get intrinsic pleasure from it, so like you I've done an enormous amount of reading on a variety of topics.

# Ways being extremely curious can be bad that nobody tells you about

Not long ago, I started to feel discouraged because it didn't seem like the rules I was following in my life were actually making my life better. I think this was for a few reasons:

- For a long time I was reading articles on HN, Twitter, and elsewhere, so my attention was being extremely divided. When I became aware of this, I killed all my newsfeeds and just started reading books. Obviously I'm still here on HN, but I'm happy to say I read a fraction of what I used to.

- I prioritize learning something interesting over doing things that would make my life better, so I struggle with taking care of myself (e.g. cooking, household chores). I often wonder if I'm actually using learning as a distraction from anxiety.

- I started to realize most of the things I learn I don't really understand. This seems to be for a few reasons. 1) Reality has a surprising amount of detail, 2) a lot of authors honestly aren't that good, 3) I'm not always criticizing what I'm reading to see if it makes sense, sometimes just suspending disbelief with the hope that it'll all come together in time. But, if you don't actually understand things, you can't really do much with them. I've been aiming to instead of generically learn, learn with the aim of building tangible skills, because I think that would make me happier.

- I prioritize learning over reflecting on the higher-order reason for learning things in the first place. This is mostly because trying to figure out a high-level system to organize what I actually want to do with my life hasn't really seemed to get me anywhere, so I've resigned myself to looking at all the things I'm interested in learning, sticking with it for a few months, and then reevaluating. Not a system I'd recommend but it sort of works. I think I need to study philosophy; self-reflection for hours in coffee shops doesn't seem to actually lead to anything but disorganized, loosely associated vagaries.

- An extreme emphasis on reading can cause you to miss a huge part of your life, which is your conscious, subjective experience of things, who/what that spontaneous process that is "you" really is, and how to express it. For the longest time, I dismissed this as being useless to discuss or learn about because I felt if something couldn't be expressed in words, it was bullshit and it wasn't worth spending time on. The objective is nice and rational, but the subjective is still something you can gain knowledge of, and some people who are really in touch with art/fashion/film/interior design/music are shaping our emotional responses in ways that you just don't even notice if you limit yourself to books. A friend encouraged me to pick up an art to help develop this type of self-awareness better, and it's been a struggle, but one I'm grateful for.

# Explorers

Still, I think pleasure from learning is a valuable trait. One thing I've been reflecting on is Bartle's Taxonomy of Player Types [1], which would probably categorize us both as Explorers:

> Explorers, dubbed "Spades" (♠) for their tendency to dig around, are players who prefer discovering areas, and immerse themselves in the game world. They are often annoyed by time-restricted missions as that does not allow them to traverse at their own pace. They enjoy finding glitches or a hidden easter egg.

This model seems interesting to me for a few reasons:

- My friend, an Achiever type, and I, started playing an MMO game back in 2020 and we ended up completely dominating the in-game economy. I think this was because he was extremely pragmatic about moving us toward our goals, and I was able to really think hard about what we really needed to do in order to multiply our wealth.

- I've been reflecting on my career as a software engineer, and I think it wears me out because tech culture is so results oriented, which doesn't suit how I like to do things. I really don't care about making money or velocity, I just want to understand things and let my skills compound.

- I think this interest in deeply understanding how a system works and then being able to build new things with those principles was really valuable in being able to build/see the future in the game. I think it would work well in the real world as well. I've been looking for a word for this idea at a broader level, and I think it's essentially "critical thinking", something I don't think I ever properly learned in college. If I could do this in more parts of my life, I think I could do amazing things. I've been thinking of learning to write as a way to get better at this. But I agree, I don't really want to start a blog- I hate the attention economy and all it entails. I think all great writing is essentially criticism, but so is all great art and all great products, so I'd rather push in that direction after developing the ability to critically write/think.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bartle_taxonomy_of_player_type...

I wrote this quickly, so apologize if it feels half-baked, but hope it stirs some thoughts. Am hoping others will have more to say on some of these points because honestly it's been an existential struggle for me trying to understand what to do with life. SWE hasn't really felt like my true calling lately.

Re: Ask HN: I'm interested in so many disciplines, but what can I do with that?

#58
I suffer EXACTLY with your wonderful affliction!

The way I deal with this is constant invention, however I lack the forethought of journaling...

So I am changing this, I have a number of physical paper graph-paper-based journals that I capture my thoughts in now.

I FUCKING REGRET that IU have not been journaling all my life. 45 years down the drain.

The best engineers I know (Looking at you JDB) all keep good journals.

Write down everything you have done each day - even if it is *"slept on the couch and got a killer nap"*

Re: Ask HN: I'm interested in so many disciplines, but what can I do with that?

#59
If I was starting with such a broad set of interests and evidence that I will come to find almost anything rewarding -- honestly I'd think about who is served by the work I'm doing and whether it allows me to live in a location I like comfortably by whatever definition you use for that.

Consider working with a non-profit, your breadth of interest can be a huge benefit to a small team. Small teams often lack the headcount to realize when they have a problem with a simple alternative or how to tackle certain kinds of more specialized problems like surveys or non-profit taxes or heck, when I was a kid I remember learning to typeset newsletters because no one else really knew how... like any underfunded small team you have to fill in the gaps as well as you can.

Stuff that you find trivial might seem unattainable to others there and a breadth of experience can provide a lot of context and research directions that would otherwise be missed. And if it serves a social good that you care about all the better.

Re: Ask HN: I'm interested in so many disciplines, but what can I do with that?

#60
post #3

Read a couple of books by Barbara sher: Refuse to choose [0] She calls people like us "Scanners" and claims that our diversity of interests is not a weakness, but a strength. Then goes on techniques to make this skill work for us. [0] https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1594863032/

It's only a strength if you have a strong base and a way to tie things together. Being interested in a bunch of disparate fields is not in itself useful. In fact for most people it's probably completely useless, because you're going to suck at everything. Ex: OP wants to read "textbooks to learn basic concepts" and "swim in their ideas". That doesn't equal competence. However, if you have strong expertise in a partic…

I find that exposure to a broad range of concepts expands cognitive breadth and the set of things one can quickly comprehend exponentially, even in /complete/ absence of expertise or competence.

Single-field people tend to be hilariously bad at diffuse reasoning relative to what you'd expect from a person that competent.

Post reply on HN