Earlier quoted context omitted.
> But they were the only people with the time, and with the access to the resources and labour, to propagate their ideas in multiple copies. Marcus Aurelius didn't publish the book, the book contains thoughts he wrote to himself without any intent to make them public.
Yes, fair. Still, his writings were published after his death by men who felt that what he had to say was important, and that it should be disseminated, and they had access to the means to do so. We only have two copies of full manuscripts with the work, I believe. Without the people who owned and duplicated those books in medieval Greece, who were almost exclusively the elites or hired by the elites, we wouldn't hav…
Ask HN: Who else sick of “Rich” people teaching moral/life philosophy?
51–52 of 52 posts
Re: Ask HN: Who else sick of “Rich” people teaching moral/life philosophy?
#52I'm only mildly annoyed when 20 something kids with huge amounts of generational wealth feel like they've got deep insights. Look everyone has opinions and knowledge and I'm sure there is value to it. This behavior shouldn't surprise you... positions of power have always felt self importance and a desire to espouse their ideas either as a means to make their egos feel good or simply cast themselves in a positive ligh…
That's because people with generational wealth are more able to explore their options. It's almost like having money makes you capable of living up to potential or something. *eta: some of them still turn out rotten.
Going through such events as partner's cancer treatment, triumphs such as full remission, and the death of a loved one have had more impact on my values and perspective of time then would ever happen with bank accounts bursting at the seams.
Growing older, with continued exposure over time to new ideas and perspectives from people from all walks of life from over the world has also had a big effect.
These experiences are not bought with money.