Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What are decentralized Twitter alternatives?

news.ycombinator.com

51–60 of 239 posts

Re: Ask HN: What are decentralized Twitter alternatives?

#51

There hasn't been a post with the words "twitter alternative" in 3 weeks [0]... but this probably has nothing to do with Twitter banning Donald Trump today. [0] https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...

I think it has to do with Google Play Store and Apple App Store banning Parler.

Re: Ask HN: What are decentralized Twitter alternatives?

#52

Mastodon, GNU Social, and the Fediverse: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mastodon_(software) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_social https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fediverse The two software systems are compatible (both comply with the OStatus standard) so you can interact with content on servers that use the system. Diaspora also exists, but it's arguably more like Facebook: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diaspora_(soc…

GNU Social is exactly how I imagined it to be.

It’s not exactly modern design but it does work and is super easy to set up.

Re: Ask HN: What are decentralized Twitter alternatives?

#53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think you're mixing decentralised and unmoderated here. You're free to run those accounts from another instance or provision your own. But you can't force someone else to carry that account, just as I can't force your Mastodon instance to carry mine.

So, `@realDonaldTrump` was suspended at least from Mastodon.social . How many instances left? How many also suspended `@realDonaldTrump`?

He can afford his own instance which will never block him. Let's not pretend he's being stopped from running an independent social broadcast.

It doesn't matter how many instances block him - nobody can be forced to listen to him.

Re: Ask HN: What are decentralized Twitter alternatives?

#55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Which means that in practice, it's very debatable how much more free these decentralized platforms are than centralized ones, and whether they're worth the extra effort required to make decentralization work. Especially since Mastodon seems to have (from my limited understanding) a "if you dare to talk to the Bad People you're also a Bad Person and getting dropped" mentality, effectively meaning that you cannot run a…

This is like complaining that a public street isn’t free because people can walk away if they don’t want to deal with you.

No, it’s saying that it’s not enough of an improvement to warrant the gulf of work required to make it compelling to anyone beyond the few people who use it today.

We really need to move beyond this mindset where we think anyone will use an exact replica of an incumbent with some silver bullet tweak nobody actually cares about. It’s like thinking “Twitter but built with Rust” is compelling and getting mad at the sheeple when they couldn’t care less.

Re: Ask HN: What are decentralized Twitter alternatives?

#56
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

GNU Social is exactly how I imagined it to be.

It’s not exactly modern design but it does work and is super easy to set up.

It can be made relatively pretty: https://web.archive.org/web/20100413124819/http://identi.ca/

Re: Ask HN: What are decentralized Twitter alternatives?

#57
This likely isn't what the op had in mind, but if you're open to it, the best alternative to both reading and authoring on Twitter is to get up from your desk and exercise outside for 10 or 15 minutes. If you see other people, start a friendly, civil conversation. The skills you develop once you get the hang of doing this, and the information you'll stumble upon outclass Twitter, which is merely an interaction between human and keyboard.

Re: Ask HN: What are decentralized Twitter alternatives?

#58
post #7

https://getaether.net is decentralized reddit.

I've used it and unfortunately nobody is on it. Not even for boring discussions. Imo your best bet nowadays is to find obscure discord servers. it has wide adoption and doesn't have mass appeal since each server casts its net only as wide as it's admins can reach.

Re: Ask HN: What are decentralized Twitter alternatives?

#59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is like complaining that a public street isn’t free because people can walk away if they don’t want to deal with you.

No, it’s saying that it’s not enough of an improvement to warrant the gulf of work required to make it compelling to anyone beyond the few people who use it today. We really need to move beyond this mindset where we think anyone will use an exact replica of an incumbent with some silver bullet tweak nobody actually cares about. It’s like thinking “Twitter but built with Rust” is compelling and getting mad at the shee…

The second paragraph is lamenting the fact that other instances can refuse to federate with you:

> Especially since Mastodon seems to have (from my limited understanding) a "if you dare to talk to the Bad People you're also a Bad Person and getting dropped" mentality, effectively meaning that you cannot run an instance that is federating with both the mainstream fediverse and anything the mainstream fediverse doesn't like.

Re: Ask HN: What are decentralized Twitter alternatives?

#60

Mastodon, GNU Social, and the Fediverse: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mastodon_(software) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_social https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fediverse The two software systems are compatible (both comply with the OStatus standard) so you can interact with content on servers that use the system. Diaspora also exists, but it's arguably more like Facebook: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diaspora_(soc…

GNU Social is exactly how I imagined it to be.

That prompted me to imagine what a parody of a GNU-style Twitter would look like, and yes, the connection works from the opposite direction.
Post reply on HN