Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What does performance management look like at your company?

news.ycombinator.com

51–60 of 170 posts

Re: Ask HN: What does performance management look like at your company?

#51
post #24

It's all honestly completely useless. I've never had a useful performance review at any company ever. It's either I'm doing bad, and know it, and that is either my fault or due to reasons outside of my control. Or I'm doing well, and know it. Honestly, sometimes at places things were so bad that I felt I was doing terrible, but I was actually keeping the team going by pushing past a lot of tricky issues. Really I thi…

I wish I had that kind of insight into my ‘performance’ pre-review! I’m at a FAANG right now and given my interactions with my manager alone, I figured I was bombing performance-wise (constant complaints about my work, refuses to acknowledge any accomplishments, super angry at me during one on ones, assigns piles of work that ‘need’ to be done by Monday on Friday at 6pm and then doesn’t even acknowledge the completio…

Alternatively your manager could proactively give you bits and pieces of that positive feedback without being forced to by a formal, time-consuming process.

Re: Ask HN: What does performance management look like at your company?

#52
I am in the quest of a system myself. I have tried various systems and asked other companies (big and small) on theirs. My tech startup was around 25-30 employees over 5 years. We have tried Balanced Scorecards/OKRs linked systems, 360 Evaluations, etc and ended up making a mix.

We used Google Sheets and asked for qualitative feedback on defined headers (skill with KPIs & culture/values), and a rating (1-5). Each of the headers had weightage that changed with roles & levels.

We tried to make promotions and compensation changes as data driven as possible, but they were inline with intuition / general opinion. To the employee it always felt like "Why did we do all this for such little change?!" It sucks but you need to improve the system across many years. With every round try and understand signal vs noise. That's how you build trust.

Consistency is key. A few learnings regardless of the system that I learnt the hard way:

* Communication. You need to communicate before, during and after the process. You need to make it relatable for all levels of employees. Give them specific templates with specific examples. You need to remove the narrative of you-vs-them, doing-this-to-justify-an-increase, and bring focus on reflection.

* Frequency/Cycle. "if it hurts, do it more often" is the quote that applies to this. Never let it slide. Minimum every six months, ideally every quarter.

* Review of KPIs. You need to review the KPIs every week without fail. It forces you to focus on metrics that you can move on a week-on-week basis. Anything that changes in step function over a month/quarter/year can be broken into a smaller metric.

* Rewards and Recognitions. We were always late on this. Always rolling out the red carpet when someone threatened to quit. It always felt like extortion as the manager. Don't wait for the cycle to call out extreme performance (great and terrible). Give negative feedback in private as quickly as possible. Do a non-monetary (Amazon Gift Coupons etc) for great performance. Wait for promotions and compensation.

* Pay performance linked pay well. I think this was what I got wrong the most. I did not plan the company finances well enough to pay out immediately. I would say "Hey great performance! We will pay you $$ but in 2-3 months when our situation improves". That erodes trust in a moment.

* Getting and acting on feedback. I struggled on this one too and made many excuses -- we are going through a curve

Hope this helps. I would love to hear from others.

Re: Ask HN: What does performance management look like at your company?

#53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wish I had that kind of insight into my ‘performance’ pre-review! I’m at a FAANG right now and given my interactions with my manager alone, I figured I was bombing performance-wise (constant complaints about my work, refuses to acknowledge any accomplishments, super angry at me during one on ones, assigns piles of work that ‘need’ to be done by Monday on Friday at 6pm and then doesn’t even acknowledge the completio…

Alternatively your manager could proactively give you bits and pieces of that positive feedback without being forced to by a formal, time-consuming process.

And this is at a company that supposedly prioritizes constant feedback, we even have multiple mandatory training sessions per year on providing fast feedback. Go figure...

Re: Ask HN: What does performance management look like at your company?

#54
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you’re ever in a SAFe team, one of the tenants is that annual reviews are useless. It pushes for doing constructive reviews every PI (approximately quarterly).

If I'm ever again in a SAFe team, something has gone terribly wrong. I won't join a company that uses this practice unless I'm very desperate. If a company I'm at adopts it after I've joined I will immediately begin looking elsewhere.

Why? reading Wikipedia this seems to be what used to be called RAD - done right its Fucking awesome.

One thing is you need 100% collocated experienced people who know what they are doing - no third party agencies who spend 15 mins discussing pixel separation in photoshop mock-ups.

It also not something you'd carelessly throw a junior or an intern into

Re: Ask HN: What does performance management look like at your company?

#55
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not a blessing. As bad as performance management, goal setting, and OKRs can be when it's done badly, working for a company that isn't engaged with helping you to improve is far worse. Even if you're motivated to improve on your own you'll be working with people who aren't and that's more stressful and annoying than any number of performance measurement systems.

Why concern yourself with everyone having to be like you?

Because I'm awesome.

Re: Ask HN: What does performance management look like at your company?

#56

It has been known for nearly 100 years that you can never criticize your staff. “I will speak ill of no man and speak all the good I know of everybody.” ― Benjamin Franklin Last job, my last performance review. There was literally only 1 complaint against me. I was late >40 times. My boss told me he was disappointed in me. I was upset because I was never ever late to work; I was always early. I asked him to tell me w…

I hope you then worked out how much TOIL you where owned and pointed out to them the definition of salaried employment.

Re: Ask HN: What does performance management look like at your company?

#58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What kind of anomalies do you track on clients and inventories ?

Client interaction with proposals. Client interaction with website. Client follow-through on 'promises' --> sales methodology we employ.

Very interesting. That is predicated on sales people updating some "status" right ?

You could have a very deep sales methodology. Just curious if that's how you do it

Re: Ask HN: What does performance management look like at your company?

#60
post #57

Performance management is subjectivity masquerading as objectivity. I'm a broken record about this.

In theory performance management should be about helping people improve. In practice performance management is about four things:

1) Pay

2) Promotions

3) Accountability (e.g. firing)

4) To satisfy legal requirements (perceived and real)

Performance management falls under the umbrella of HR. HR's historical roots are in compliance. In the 90's when cost vs. profit center was the rage, the HRBP model emerged to prove HR could provide business value beyond compliance. HRBP is the dominant model now but it hasn't had the impact its creator intended. Inertia is a powerful thing.

Combine HR's roots in compliance, with the above four reasons performance management exists in practice and that will give you a good way to understand why performance management works the way it does.

If you're learning about these things in an effort to improve your own organization's practices then you can also use the above to evaluate any proposed changes and think about what they would have to contend with. History is replete with failures. Unless you are in a small organization, with total control over incentives and the culture then I will leave you with a quote from Blade:

"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."

Post reply on HN