Earlier quoted context omitted.
It may sound unfair but in the USA broadband is not so good if you are not around major city hubs..which them being virtual might be their concern
I live in a US town of ~6k people, and currently get 6Mbps on the lowest tier plan available (50 Mbs is readily available, just a bit pricey for personal use). I don't buy this argument at all, as there are metro areas that will have worse connectivity than some rural areas within the US. I also wonder what the real reason is.
Ask HN: Who Is Hiring Remote Workers? (January 2011 Edition)
51–60 of 77 posts
Re: Ask HN: Who Is Hiring Remote Workers? (January 2011 Edition)
#52Re: Ask HN: Who Is Hiring Remote Workers? (January 2011 Edition)
#53Earlier quoted context omitted.
Heh, yes. Developer team size is up to 23 now according to our about-us page. My estimate in that post was totally off.
Sorry, but this seems very odd to me that a developer would be almost 50% off in estimating their own team size, then post a second comment correcting it only halfway, and finally getting the correct answer by looking at your 'About Us' page? What kind of working environment do you have that in a team of less than 25, a member of that team can be that far off-base?
Also I'm bad at estimating these things apparently. :P
Re: Ask HN: Who Is Hiring Remote Workers? (January 2011 Edition)
#54We're hiring Java wizards to work on the core of Tropo. http://tropo.com/ We're a distributed team (China, London, Orlando, Philly, Phoenix, and Bay Area) so we're adept at working remotely. Somewhere in the Bay Area preferred, but we'd also love to talk to you if you're located near any other large US city or technology hub (Seattle, Boulder, Austin, Chicago, Boston, NYC, Philly, etc). Job description at http://www.…
Why the preferential treatment of folks from large cities and "technology hubs"? Seems to miss the point.
I'm sure that Buffalo, Oklahoma is a fantastic place to live, but we prefer you be somewhere you can hang out with, learn from, and teach other geeks.
That said, if you're unbelievably awesome, hit me up anyway. We like smart people regardless of their location.
Re: Ask HN: Who Is Hiring Remote Workers? (January 2011 Edition)
#55Earlier quoted context omitted.
Come on, you guys advertise this job post every month on HN. Hard to believe you haven't found the right candidate(s) yet...
Looks like they want to have only the best candidate, but for maintaining a horrible codebase. Obviously a position that's hard to fill.
However! I see a lot of developers who would have a hard time fixing a bug / making a small change in an area which has a lot of legacy cruft present without going and rewriting the whole thing. Now, they are right that rewriting it is probably the best course of action from a codebase-health viewpoint... but it's not necessarily the actual best use of their time. If code is working then it's not an urgent priority that it get rewritten.
To be slightly trite, "perfect is the enemy of good."
That's why we'd like to get developers who are okay with the idea of working on a codebase that contains legacy code. And that's why I'm a little bit over the top about it.
Re: Ask HN: Who Is Hiring Remote Workers? (January 2011 Edition)
#56Re: Ask HN: Who Is Hiring Remote Workers? (January 2011 Edition)
#57I'm looking for a strong front-end developer (HTML/CSS/JS) for a 40/hr week contract position for three months with competitive pay.
Re: Ask HN: Who Is Hiring Remote Workers? (January 2011 Edition)
#58Canonical has a number of remote positions open: http://webapps.ubuntu.com/employment/
Re: Ask HN: Who Is Hiring Remote Workers? (January 2011 Edition)
#59Blue Gecko (a remote DBA services company) is looking for intermediate to expert MySQL or PostgreSQL DBAs. Although our headquarters is in Seattle, many of our DBAs work at home full time, and our corporate culture is configured to accommodate remote workers. Since we operate 24/7 we need folks in every timezone. Drop me a line if you're interested, my email address is in my profile.
Re: Ask HN: Who Is Hiring Remote Workers? (January 2011 Edition)
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
I live in a US town of ~6k people, and currently get 6Mbps on the lowest tier plan available (50 Mbs is readily available, just a bit pricey for personal use). I don't buy this argument at all, as there are metro areas that will have worse connectivity than some rural areas within the US. I also wonder what the real reason is.
I live outside a town of 750 and have fiber to my freaking house.