I have a soft spot for Neocities, which is trying to be everything we loved about Geocities, but for a modern age: https://neocities.org/ ZERO ADVERTISEMENTS , even for the free plan. Supports only static hosting, is free for 100mb websites with bandwidth of 50GB per month, or five dollars per month for 10,000mb with 2TB and a number of other extra features. EDIT: As mentioned by detaro, custom domain only supported…
Ask HN: What free or low-cost static site hosting do you use most?
51–60 of 229 posts
Re: Ask HN: What free or low-cost static site hosting do you use most?
#52Re: Ask HN: What free or low-cost static site hosting do you use most?
#53It is cheap enough to not bother with the limitations of most low-cost static site hosting.
Re: Ask HN: What free or low-cost static site hosting do you use most?
#54I have a soft spot for Neocities, which is trying to be everything we loved about Geocities, but for a modern age: https://neocities.org/ ZERO ADVERTISEMENTS , even for the free plan. Supports only static hosting, is free for 100mb websites with bandwidth of 50GB per month, or five dollars per month for 10,000mb with 2TB and a number of other extra features. EDIT: As mentioned by detaro, custom domain only supported…
I can't find if neocities support custom domain names, any idea?
Re: Ask HN: What free or low-cost static site hosting do you use most?
#55I'm very happy with the service at https://www.scaleway.com
Edit: Looks like it's because they're using Atom and ARM based servers.
Re: Ask HN: What free or low-cost static site hosting do you use most?
#56If you want to get fancy you can even attach it to your domain root (example.com vs www.example.com) using Route53. Which is impossible with many static hosts. Although that requires a hosted Route53 zone which at $2 might very well be 100x your hosting costs.
I use Jenkins to generate the website itself.
Edit: Only downside is if your traffic spikes you have no control over the cost. There is no upper bounds. With that said, it would take a tremendous amount of traffic to balloon the costs to anything worth worrying about. And at least you can be sure your website will actually stay up.
Re: Ask HN: What free or low-cost static site hosting do you use most?
#57I have a soft spot for Neocities, which is trying to be everything we loved about Geocities, but for a modern age: https://neocities.org/ ZERO ADVERTISEMENTS , even for the free plan. Supports only static hosting, is free for 100mb websites with bandwidth of 50GB per month, or five dollars per month for 10,000mb with 2TB and a number of other extra features. EDIT: As mentioned by detaro, custom domain only supported…
Re: Ask HN: What free or low-cost static site hosting do you use most?
#58I use AWS S3, which I put behind a Cloudfront distribution. It's quick to set up, and there are no servers to keep up to date and patched. You also get free SSL for your Cloudfront distribution via AWS certificate manager. For stuff like Contact Us forms, I use AWS Lambda to post the data into my company's CMS. We've had this setup for about a year now and it works quite well. The cost is almost nothing but we don't…
https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/new-gzip-compression-suppor...
You'll save a lot on your bandwidth bill.
Re: Ask HN: What free or low-cost static site hosting do you use most?
#59I use AWS S3, which I put behind a Cloudfront distribution. It's quick to set up, and there are no servers to keep up to date and patched. You also get free SSL for your Cloudfront distribution via AWS certificate manager. For stuff like Contact Us forms, I use AWS Lambda to post the data into my company's CMS. We've had this setup for about a year now and it works quite well. The cost is almost nothing but we don't…
Re: Ask HN: What free or low-cost static site hosting do you use most?
#60I think I'd go with DigitalOcean $5/mo, nginx, a static site generator (there's so many), and LetsEncrypt (for SSL).