Earlier quoted context omitted.
> You're gonna be googling the CLI switches for at least 10 minutes So there's this really amazing program called "man"
Yea there's something called a phone book too.
Ask HN: Has anyone replaced Claude/GPT with a local model for daily coding?
461–470 of 620 posts
Re: Ask HN: Has anyone replaced Claude/GPT with a local model for daily coding?
#462Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you’re arguing that model metrics don’t necessarily translate into useful output, I agree. That’s not how I measure the success of a mode and not really the point I'm trying to make. I try to set things up and test it on my actual projects. What I’m saying is that if local models were actually comparable to Claude Code in practice, we wouldn’t be having threads like this. It would be obvious to the people using th…
Having, e.g. seen Microsoft maintain a monopoly for well over a decade, there's nothing in my experience that suggests that "quality always beats hype" is remotely true. It's entirely possible Claude is just winning the hype game.
Re: Ask HN: Has anyone replaced Claude/GPT with a local model for daily coding?
#463I don't think you're going to get many "true" answers to this. The opportunity cost of not using the latest and best models is just too much right now. Every month I research this and come to the same conclusion: the time, effort, and cost required to get local models (and the coding tools around them) to perform even close to Claude Code with sonnet/opus just not worth it right now. If it was, it would be distributi…
I've got a machine in a corner collecting dust that cost me $12k to build 2 years ago. It runs fine but it's wildly impractical to use as a daily driver (loud/hot). I keep it as a reminder to not do this again. At my current pace it would take me until sometime late 2030 to spend the same amount in gpt5.5 tokens.
Re: Ask HN: Has anyone replaced Claude/GPT with a local model for daily coding?
#464for crying out loud... why would you deprive yourself?
Back in the 1990s the good C++ compilers were proprietary, eventually GCC and LLVM caught up, and now dominate. The pattern repeats in software development, and there's no reason to believe it won't continue.
Yes, right now it makes sense to use Opus 4.8, but it is good that a significant number of people are using other options, and making sure they work and are ready for when you need them.
Plus it is extremely fun and connecting and hackerish to do local coding with a local model. Try it.
Re: Ask HN: Has anyone replaced Claude/GPT with a local model for daily coding?
#465Re: Ask HN: Has anyone replaced Claude/GPT with a local model for daily coding?
#466Earlier quoted context omitted.
2x RTX3090 is extremely overkill for gaming, you can run any released game on earth on ultra for much less
There is currently no gpu in production that can max out the largest and fastest displays in graphically demanding games. We have monitors that are the equivalent of two 4k monitors side by side and run at 240hz. I have a 5080 and have to turn down settings to get 60fps in cyberpunk.
Re: Ask HN: Has anyone replaced Claude/GPT with a local model for daily coding?
#467Sorry for hijacking the convo, but you (with local models) are my target audience in terms of hardware.
Is anybody willing to test my new app https://document.bot? It is like Cursor IDE but custom harness for knowledge work (PDF's, MS Office files etc).
You can connect your existing offline LLM models through LMStudio, Ollama, or app managed LLM models (Qwen3.5, Gemma 4, etc)
Might have to make a new Ask HN post for this, but again, you are users with good hardware setups.
Re: Ask HN: Has anyone replaced Claude/GPT with a local model for daily coding?
#468For personal use, yes. I replaced a $100/m subscription to claude in favor of running pi harness pointed at unsloth studio, using both qwen (unsloth/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-MTP-GGUF) and gemma (unsloth/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-GGUF) models, depending on my mood. I have a machine I built about 5 years ago with dual RTX3090s in it (I was going to build a new gaming machine anyways, and the llama release had just dropped so I tacked…
> unsloth/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-MTP-GGUF I've actually tried this exact same model locally as well.. albeit on just a single 3090 at 128k context and I got around 40-60tok/s with Q4_K quantization. The thing that bugged me the most was really the quality of the output on moderately complex real-world coding tasks. Having to switch between "prompt/vibe" and "manually implement" is such a big context switch burden, because y…
Re: Ask HN: Has anyone replaced Claude/GPT with a local model for daily coding?
#469Earlier quoted context omitted.
I am right there with you. Mind-boggling. It's a indistinguishable from magic technology!! I tried running some basic tasks through Qwen with Opencode on a 10 year old dual Xeon server for shits and giggles. I gave it a simple task like "use ffprobe first but convert this webm to mp4" and it was able to complete the task with zero network calls outside my network. On 10 year old hardware. It took about 3 minutes to c…
> You're gonna be googling the CLI switches for at least 10 minutes So there's this really amazing program called "man"
Re: Ask HN: Has anyone replaced Claude/GPT with a local model for daily coding?
#470I have! I care about data privacy and LLMs being free. I'm using the Pi coding harness but containerized and sandboxed, to make sure it's running completely offline. On my Mac Studio with 128GB RAM (or MacBook with 36GB RAM) I'm using Qwen3.6 35b, with only 3b active parameters so that it runs really fast. I've done a complete redesign for my website's homepage and blog with Django + Wagtail. The latter is interestin…
I can use Gemini 3 Flash with the harness I built for around 8 years and still not exceed the cost of a Mac Studio with 128GB, the price for privacy is very high. Agentic flows that get stuck can be worked around but I prefer developer velocity.
Not sure if you intended this to be this philosophical, but this is basically the slogan for modern life now.