Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What do you want to see in Ubuntu 17.10?

news.ycombinator.com

451–460 of 1001 posts

Re: Ask HN: What do you want to see in Ubuntu 17.10?

#451
post #8

- FLAVOR: Desktop - HEADLINE: More stable and polished desktop - DESCRIPTION: This one is hard to pin down, but I'd like to see more general polish and stability in the Unity desktop. One example would be around multi-monitor support, it's pretty good, but a bit funky in some places. For example, if I have a monitor plugged in and I let the laptop screen lock come on, I can sit there and watch while both displays cyc…

-FLAVOR: Ubuntu Desktop -HEADLINE: Network manager that works -DESCRIPTION: The single thing that would make Ubuntu seem 10x more polished than it now is the horrible state of the network manager. The little wifi bar in the top right. Sometimes, randomly, after dropping a wifi connection, or going to sleep and waking it will: 1) Stop listing SSIDs except the one I've already configured and want to connect to. (But I…

+1 This!

Re: Ask HN: What do you want to see in Ubuntu 17.10?

#452
- FLAVOR: Ubuntu Desktop

- HEADLINE: Improved Unity launcher usability

- DESCRIPTION: As far as I can tell, you can drag/drop items to the launcher, and rearrange the buttons on the launcher, but changing the icon (or setting one at all) and getting the launcher to actually launch the thing you want is unnecessarily difficult, requiring .desktop file edits that I can never seem to get to work anyway. I still have to run /home/myname/eclipse/eclipse from a terminal on one of my machines because the launcher is not working/non-intuitive and I don't have the time/desire to stop what I'm doing and figure it out.

Also, expandable/group launchers (many apps under one launcher square/icon spreading into multiple items) would be nice.

Otherwise, great work! Love ubuntu and Unity.

Re: Ask HN: What do you want to see in Ubuntu 17.10?

#453

- FLAVOR: Ubuntu Server - HEADLINE: ZFS on root in installer - DESCRIPTION: as headline! ZoL is awesome. Extra hoops though to install on root. - Head of development @ an ISV.

I know it's not really an Ubuntu bug, but ZFS on Linux is broken. Try growing a disk in say VMWare or VirtualBox at see ZFS on Linux not knowing how to grow the filesystem. It would be nice it that was fixed.

Unless I'm misunderstanding, I don't even see that as a bug.

Real hardware disks dont suddenly magically beome bigger. That ZoL doesn't notice/know what to do isn't surprising?

Re: Ask HN: What do you want to see in Ubuntu 17.10?

#454
post #43

My biggest wish is Ubuntu (and Debian) switching from systemd to any other init system. I know that won't happen but I was asked and that's the only thing I want, whenever you like it or not.

also check https://www.devuan.org we are very close to release Jessie stable, backed by a vibrant community http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=devuan For those preferring an introductory video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMvyOGawNwo

Just saw the video and must say that it has really sparked my interest in Devuan. I heard of Devuan when the fork was first announced but never gave it much notice, now is the first time I try to understand what it really is. It seems like Devuan is much more organized and well-thought than I imagined. This is music to my ears:

Devuan will do its best to stay minimal and abide to the UNIX philosophy of "doing one thing and doing it well". It will foster diversity and freedom of choice among all its components and will perceive itself not as an end product, but as a a process, a starting point for developers, a viable base for sysadmins and a stable tool for people who have enough experience with computers. Devuan will never compromise for more efficiency at the cost of the freedom of its users, rather than leave that and the responsibility for a secure setup to downstream developers.

I need to do much more research and of course testing, but Devuan could be light at the end of the tunnel.

Re: Ask HN: What do you want to see in Ubuntu 17.10?

#455
- FLAVOR:ALL VERSIONS - HEADLINE:SIMPLE SHORTCUT IN DESKTOP, AS WINDOWS - DESCRIPTION:ANY PROGRAM, RIGHT CLICK, SEND TO DESKTOP

----------

- FLAVOR:ALL VERSIONS - HEADLINE: LAUNCHER OPTIONAL AT BOTTOM OR LEFT SIDE - DESCRIPTION: WITH SIMPLE MOUSE DRAG, AS WINDOWS

----------

- FLAVOR:ALL VERSIONS - HEADLINE: SHOW DESKTOP BUTTON IN LAUNCHER - DESCRIPTION: AT RIGHT BORDER OF LAUNCHER, WITHOUT ANY PADDING. JUST AS WINDOWS 10. ITS VERY FUNCIONAL.

THANKS!!!!

Re: Ask HN: What do you want to see in Ubuntu 17.10?

#456
post #56

- FLAVOR: Ubuntu Desktop - HEADLINE: Better Mouse Settings - DESCRIPTION: Right now mouse acceleration is enabled by default, and for heavy mouse users this is really not usable. There is no way to change this behaviour in the mouse settings. The only way as a user to get a workable mouse configuration is with custom startup scripts, and it took me as an experienced Linux user and software engineer a long time to fig…

Mouse scroll/wheel acceleration is also sth which gives a very natural feeling on osx but which is missing in Linux. Together with that, pixel-based scrolling, not line based.

On windows I can chance the scroll speed so its one line per tick, on ubuntu its stuck at 3 lines per tick. I have a logitech 'spinny wheel' and this makes it very frustrating as the screen zooms by and I lose precision.

Re: Ask HN: What do you want to see in Ubuntu 17.10?

#457
- FLAVOR:ALL VERSIONS - HEADLINE:SIMPLE SHORTCUT IN DESKTOP, AS WINDOWS - DESCRIPTION:ANY PROGRAM, RIGHT CLICK, SEND TO DESKTOP

----------

- FLAVOR:ALL VERSIONS - HEADLINE: LAUNCHER OPTIONAL AT BOTTOM OR LEFT SIDE - DESCRIPTION: WITH SIMPLE MOUSE DRAG, AS WINDOWS

----------

- FLAVOR:ALL VERSIONS - HEADLINE: SHOW DESKTOP BUTTON IN LAUNCHER - DESCRIPTION: AT RIGHT BORDER OF LAUNCHER, WITHOUT ANY PADDING. JUST AS WINDOWS 10. ITS VERY FUNCIONAL.

THANKS!!!!

Re: Ask HN: What do you want to see in Ubuntu 17.10?

#458
FLAVOR Ubuntu Desktop

HEADLINE Switching to as main desktop environment

DESCRIPTION Unity is the number one reason I hear people turning away from GNU/Linux in general: Ubuntu is more or less the de facto first install, and invariably the ones that go through with a standard Ubuntu install turn back to Windows because they could not get used to the UI. Not that the conversion rate is 100% for when I do manage to convince someone to use Linux Mint with Cinnamon, but I don't hear UI complaints.

Lots of people I talk to use Cinnamon or a tiling window manager, and nobody I ever talk to prefers Unity (even if they are okay with using it).

Re: Ask HN: What do you want to see in Ubuntu 17.10?

#459
post #149

Isn't this pretty much spam? What interesting discussion could possibly come of it and what if everyone with a product started posting these?

I'm really sorry that you feel that way.

I'm enthralled with the discussion, reading every single response :-)

Ubuntu is among the world's largest community driven open source projects, and we're delighted to have feedback from the forward-thinking HackerNews community here!

Cheers, :-Dustin

Re: Ask HN: What do you want to see in Ubuntu 17.10?

#460

FLAVOR: Ubuntu Desktop - HEADLINE: Replace X11 with Mir or Wayland - DESCRIPTION: X11 is old, slow, and full of security issues. Mir, even in alpha, is much more responsive and provies important 21st centry feature set. Wayland is already used by a major distro. X11 is that cobweb that's gone uncleaned in our closet for too long. - HEADLINE: Improve UI. - DESCRIPTION: When I use Ubuntu it's often easier to use the te…

The "X11 is full of security issues" is full if FUD, IME. Like, they say true-but-irrelevant-and-misleading statements like "any program running in an X11 server can view/alter any other program in the same X11 server, and Wayland fixes this" - this irrelevant because common security of practice, IIRC, is to run nested X11 servers and give each program its own.

X11 also has a whole lot of commonly-used security/sandboxing extensions, but these are ignored in lieu of comparing vanilla X11 with vanilla Wayland, and pointing out that only the latter does security properly.

Meanwhile, Wayland forces monolithic design, in requiring the panel, hotkey daemon, WM, etc to be built into the compositor. Essentially, each Wayland compositor is its own DE (not its own WM, despite common misconception).

I want to see X11 die, but Wayland has some serious failures as an X11 replacement.

Post reply on HN