Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Which abandoned proprietary software would you resurrect?

news.ycombinator.com

441–450 of 837 posts

Re: Ask HN: Which abandoned proprietary software would you resurrect?

#441
Front page and iWeb (or even bbedit/homepage).

Trying to teach kids simple html site design with core principles (you own the html, you put it where you want) is harder because you have to plunge them into code and file transfer and what not.

Earlier kid had a much easier way with iWeb basically making word docs and pushing them out to any web server.

The web based kits are great if you want a web site, but terrible for learning how to build web sites.

Re: Ask HN: Which abandoned proprietary software would you resurrect?

#442

Ecco Pro for Windows and its predecessor, Lotus Agenda for DOS, which inspired a multimillion dollar open-source software debacle that inspired the book, "Dreaming in Code". Ecco is still being used 20 years later and has been binary patched to support Lua extensions. Written by a four person team in Seattle. doogiePIM has been resuscitated by its founder, hopefully it will carry a torch for some of the ideas in Ecco…

I loved Ecco's outliner features. Give me cross-platform ecco pro with cloud syncing and I'll never use onenote again.

Re: Ask HN: Which abandoned proprietary software would you resurrect?

#443
post #252

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Windyws Phone's tile setup is still the best home screen setup for mobile. As I peep at my Android home with pretty wallpaper with acres of bhank space and uninformative icons, I pine for the informative, intelligent WP tiles. Ms Image Composer was unbeatable for digital and web stuff back then. Photoshop was rather clumsy in comparison. As for email clients, I do keep wondering how Thunderbird can be so slow , how i…

Have Android’s “widgets” been removed? That’s a thing I still miss sometimes on iOS, most of my Nexus One’s homescreen was taken up by my calendar.

That's still a thing, it's just the design of widgets from app to app is disparate, usually visually clashing if multiple widgets are used. Not as clean and uniform as Windows Phone tiles.

There is an Android launcher (launcher 10, i think) that offers tiles, and some of them even live tiles. It's okay, not quite the same slick experience though.

Re: Ask HN: Which abandoned proprietary software would you resurrect?

#444

Front page and iWeb (or even bbedit/homepage). Trying to teach kids simple html site design with core principles (you own the html, you put it where you want) is harder because you have to plunge them into code and file transfer and what not. Earlier kid had a much easier way with iWeb basically making word docs and pushing them out to any web server. The web based kits are great if you want a web site, but terrible…

Have you looked at neocities.org

Re: Ask HN: Which abandoned proprietary software would you resurrect?

#445
If I could buy a good Windows phone today (e.g., current technology level, not used), I would immediately. I refuse to own an Apple product, and I don't like Google knowing so much about me (I've had multiple bad experiences with romhacking, so that's a no-go).

Re: Ask HN: Which abandoned proprietary software would you resurrect?

#446
post #325

* Windows Phone. Fantastic UI, and coupled with the Lumia, it was an awesome user experience. * The old Winamp, with all the intricate shortcuts that I had memorized. * Windows XP itself. I have been on Linux for years, and XP was the last Windows I used alongside it (for MSOffice). XP had reached the peak in terms of being able to control the desktop using the keyboard. And then the downslide started.

I know a lot of people who loved Windows XP, but I always hated it. Especially compared to Ubuntu, it felt like the past. Having to hunt down drivers and install them before any hardware started working was a pain, and after I tried Ubuntu and it auto-detected my wifi card and sound card, that was the end of any respect I had for Windows XP. And that's not even mentioning the number of times I had to call the phone n…

I liked XP for the UI. Ubuntu is still ages behind, although with Gnome again it seems to be getting better. Unity was a disaster.

Re: Ask HN: Which abandoned proprietary software would you resurrect?

#447
Macromedia/Adobe Director (1985-2013) was a really cool authoring environment. You could drag and drop animations and interactive experience together really fast. It was an animation software first but had its own scripting language. Even kids could create complex experiences and games with it. Today I need to code everything first before I am able to see anything. I miss this easy direct wysiwyg way of doing things. I think the development processes for the modern web platform are very limiting creatively. The end of Flash is also a huge loss in that regard.

Re: Ask HN: Which abandoned proprietary software would you resurrect?

#448

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I completely agree and I used to work at Microsoft. Microsoft lost because they didn't have the users or the apps. It's an instructive story of how an inferior product can win. I'm not saying that happens all the time or that it's inevitable, but I think it's safe to say that's sort of what happened here.

A platform without users or apps and years late is not one I'd call superior. Good ideas are not nearly enough, as they often say around HN.

I thought it was pretty clear from the poster's message he was talking about product sans network effects.

Re: Ask HN: Which abandoned proprietary software would you resurrect?

#449

If I could buy a good Windows phone today (e.g., current technology level, not used), I would immediately. I refuse to own an Apple product, and I don't like Google knowing so much about me (I've had multiple bad experiences with romhacking, so that's a no-go).

how is Microsoft different? just curios.

also, why not Apple?

Re: Ask HN: Which abandoned proprietary software would you resurrect?

#450

WinAmp 2. I still use Audacity in "classic" mode to make it feel like WinAmp.. Old habits die hard :) Going further back, I think Symantec JustWrite was an extremely fine piece of software; I remember it being blazingly fast on the 486 monster I had at work. But my glasses may be rose-tinted :)

Depending on the use case (mine is really simple--play music with basic playlist management), QMMP is also a really good replacement and is well-maintained.

http://qmmp.ylsoftware.com/

Post reply on HN