Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Favorite note-taking software?

news.ycombinator.com

411–420 of 436 posts

Re: Ask HN: Favorite note-taking software?

#411
I think Microsoft's OneNote is probably the best one I've used personally. The only thing that is a little labourious is setting up your notebooks/sections but once you have that set up, its actually pretty good.

I just wished it had markdown support built in and also Syntax highlighting for code examples.

Re: Ask HN: Favorite note-taking software?

#412
post #397
post #230

I like tree sheets: http://strlen.com/treesheets/

Had not heard of this but it looks interesting. Thanks for mentioning it! Though, I guess I'll run into an issue if I need to edit this on mobile at some point. It's been tough to find the exact right note tool for myself. Might end up going with synced .txt files instead, who knows. Still like the look of this for more detailed "overview" type of notes or brainstorming

Personally I've not found a suitable mobile note taking app. I tend to use old paper and pencil for that, with a cross between bullet journal and a Japanese method of organisation (visual index) for them. If I feel I need to keep the notes as they might change, etc, I'll type them up.

I'm in the process of teaching myself Emacs because I like the idea of simple txt notes (org-mode) but I'm visual in my learning so treesheets works for me.

Re: Ask HN: Favorite note-taking software?

#415

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Oh I don't doubt the usefulness of Org-Mode, but I guess the point is the one you bring up: if you want to use Org-Mode it's Emacs or the highway. With Markdown I can use any editor from a full-featured IDE all the way down to `cat` or `ed` and all I'm giving up are some quality of life features. It's the same format at the bottom, and it has the added benefit of being ubiquitous in that nearly every editor has some…

To be clear: Org format is just plaintext, and you can use it mostly in the same way you use Markdown. It's nowhere near as popular, but if all you want is Markdown feature parity, then there is growing support in other editors and places. It's only when you want to go beyond Markdown that this becomes "Emacs or the highway".

Biggest difference for me is, that I had already been taking notes in markdown since before I heard about it. The only change for me was the welcome relief of not having to be creative any more about what headings or links should look like. Rest of the syntax I already used because that's how I've always made text files "look good".

As for your orgmode example, it's not a very good example of "just plaintext" if the metadata code in between the bits of text is larger than the content of the note. I imagine that with nice syntax highlighting it becomes easier to parse in just a glance, but then it's no longer "just plaintext" in the same way that e.g. YAML isn't.

It probably works very well, but to me it looks a lot like a plaintext encoding of a database record or something. It's a different use case. Not a simple note that is "basically plaintext". For instance I would not feel entirely comfortable editing your example without worrying I'd mess up the structure or produce a syntax error. Though maybe the format is really forgiving, I can't tell. What happens if you forget the :END: bit, for instance?

Re: Ask HN: Favorite note-taking software?

#416
post #63

Workflowy is great for quick, structured, hierarchical note taking. It is basically a text only bulleted list of lists. Navigable by keyboard or mouse and syncs to whatever phone / desktop etc you have. Too expensive by half, and I don't think it is client side encrypted which is a deal breaker for anything sensitive. I really enjoy the simplicity though, great for checklists, writing papers, and all those little rar…

That used to be me. Can I suggest you check out Dynalist? It's actually maintained and updated (unlike Workflowy at this point), with more useful features. I've been finding the colouring, headers and bookmarks very useful. https://dynalist.io/

Love Dynalist for notes and todos.

Two things I dislike though, 1) as far as I can tell the dates/times can't trigger notifications. 2) the paid plan is expensive.. they give so much away for free, but then charge a lot for seemingly little. A $3/m tier is a good price point imo for a todo app. Right now it costs basically the same as Netflix..

Re: Ask HN: Favorite note-taking software?

#417

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you memory conscious because you're downloading this to some embedded device? Serious question.

The idea that i am using inefficient software boggles my mind. My laptop SSD is 128gb. Unpacked version of this software would be 100MB+ installation. It will also take a lot of my RAM during usage. So for a "truly minimal markdown editor" i get such a monster in my system. Lets take another monster, Visual Studio Code. Its installation is 72mb, but i get so much more installing it including markdown editor.

To each their own. I far prefer my UX at the cost of RAM. I agree, there are a lot of abstractions in languages which leads to this bloat, but do I think we'd have better user experiences if everyone write perfectly efficient assembly? I don't, fwiw. Do you?

I know you're not suggesting everything needs to be perfect. We just have different lines we draw where our UX outweighs things like RAM or disk space. For me, if it gives a great UX, 75MB is a tiny fraction of my RAM, I'd gladly pay it.

Besides, I'm only going to have one copy of this thing running. If it was 75MBx25 or something then I'd be concerned, but 75x1? meh.

Re: Ask HN: Favorite note-taking software?

#419

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Notational Velocity broke? Any details? I'm continuing to use it happily on High Sierra.

Yeah High Sierra was what broke for me: https://github.com/scrod/nv/issues/365 Maybe it's working now?

I switched to this: http://brettterpstra.com/projects/nvalt/

Now, if I could just find something as brilliant for this Surface Book 2.

Re: Ask HN: Favorite note-taking software?

#420
post #292

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can you please expand a bit more on your ideal note app? Results sound intriguing, but I can't imagine what it would look like from this short description.

Sure.. The idea is that the issue with tags is they can be difficult to trace to all their referenced locations. I find myself not using them because they are difficult to keep track of.. you can't 'see' them at a glance. But we don't need to see all the referenced locations, just the tree which leads away from the item you are looking at. So you get strict split between, and easy to understand, [left / right], [hier…

Oh, I see what you mean now. Left side shows which branches you used to get to leaf, and right sides show other paths to root. It might be very useful occasionally, but would probably have to stay hidden most of time because it would clutter UI with redundant information.
Post reply on HN