Earlier quoted context omitted.
When times get tough they shouldnt hire freelancers in the first place... If they have ongoing hires they pay 3 times as much on a freelancer as they do on an employee... this logic doesn't check out at all
No, the logic is right. If you have full-time employees you have to fire them when times get tough. In some countries it’s very hard to fire people and it requires months of notice. These laws encourage companies to choose contractors so they don’t get stuck with employees they can’t fire during tough times. If you have freelancers you can more flexibly pause, delay, or reduce hours and then resume them again when yo…
This is, of course, true. I want to add that a company in Europe can still tell you not to come back tomorrow. They would just have to pay for those months of notice as if you were employed. In other words, it is expensive, but it is only a money issue.