I see a lot of replies here talking about asking GPT questions in a domain an individual is an expert in, and being disappointed in the results. I think this is missing the point a bit. The impressive part of GPT isn’t that it’s an expert in anything, but that it’s better than an average human on many topics. For example - someone brought up GPT not comprehending homomorphic encryption fully. Well, I have a MS in CS…
It wasn't because it was a superintelligent entity, but because it was an intelligent scientific logbook.
It would break down possible root causes of the bug. I could add more if it misses any. It would give me the simplest possible solution to test each one. Sometimes it's not right and I have a simpler test.
But it'll track which ones we have tried so we don't go in circles with debugging. It's really a superior rubber duck + notepad.