Stay with the "Mac way". It's far better than Windows. Take disk imaging, for example. As far as I'm aware you need special software to image a Windows system but with Mac OS X it's a feature. OS X is also BSD Unix so you have far superior cli.
Ask HN: MacBooks seems to be the only viable option these days
41–50 of 449 posts
Re: Ask HN: MacBooks seems to be the only viable option these days
#42I only move them around the house, never on the road. When I move them, I place them in a Thule Gauntlet. I really take care of these babies as I find it wasteful not to.
So that is my anecdata on the 'stability' and 'care' of Apple.
My experience differs from yours. Both are wrong and true. You could just be unlucky, and so can I. No need to completely write off Dell or Lenovo over that though.
Re: Ask HN: MacBooks seems to be the only viable option these days
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
Windows has a MUCH superior cli these days because of WSL.
its certainly superior to previous windows but its ultimately a hosted vm in windows. OSX is a native unix. Yes there are limitations such as needing a vm to run docker but the core system is posix and the filesystems are all laid out in in teh unix way. on of this damn C/D drive nonsense.
Re: Ask HN: MacBooks seems to be the only viable option these days
#44My recently (ish) purchased System76 box "just worked" right out of the gate. More so than even I expected, as I had thought I would probably replace their PopOS distro with something else. But I gave it a whirl, found that it works just fine, and stuck with it.
I switched from Ubuntu to Arch some years ago because it was getting too bloated for my taste.
How is PopOS on this regard?
Re: Ask HN: MacBooks seems to be the only viable option these days
#45Re: Ask HN: MacBooks seems to be the only viable option these days
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
Windows has a MUCH superior cli these days because of WSL.
its certainly superior to previous windows but its ultimately a hosted vm in windows. OSX is a native unix. Yes there are limitations such as needing a vm to run docker but the core system is posix and the filesystems are all laid out in in teh unix way. on of this damn C/D drive nonsense.
function cb () {
powershell.exe -command "\$input | set-clipboard"
}
Mac is unix sure, but they have diverged from the popular main stream linux distributions and you still need to learn various gotchas and different ways of doing things. At least for me, our deployment environment is amazon linux 2 and I use amazon linux 2 for wsl. I am also an sre, so maybe that matters to me more than most and unix is good enough for most.Re: Ask HN: MacBooks seems to be the only viable option these days
#47I don't get it — there is a market for a high quality robust laptop — and yet it does not exist. Why our choice is an ancient refurbished pre-shit ThinkPad or Mac? You can't throw a rock without hitting a random developer — but they all type on self-destructing shittops… And they type emails to customer support instead of coding.
Because that market segment is not large enough to easily justify RnDing your own laptop platform, nailing down the finer details, upscale that into mass production and then fight existing competition, all while keeping the price competitive.
And the rest of the world will do fine with the rest of the laptops. Or build desktops for specific tasks :shrug:
Re: Ask HN: MacBooks seems to be the only viable option these days
#48I say this while having pretty meh experiences with earlier generation (~2019 and earlier) HP elite models used for work.
Re: Ask HN: MacBooks seems to be the only viable option these days
#49I've bought hundreds of Dell desktops, laptops, servers, etc., over the last 15 years. Rarely have I had any issues.
But I'm reconsidering them from now on. One of my current laptops have a weird issue and I tried to purchase extended warranty for them to fix it. Only to discover they now only service machines up to 3-years old.