41–50 of 52 posts
Probably a scandinavian country, Sweden seems like a good bet with a decent social system and well maintained infrastructure.
I wouldn't bet on Sweden in 2050, they're heading for a demographic collapse.
If you are anticipating climate change and societal collapse the more reason to go for a strong central government (as well as a strong standing army). There is not a lot of choices out there.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Currywurst and Lindt chocolate
Not sure if that's a joke or reference i don't get but Currywurst is not Swiss (and honestly i haven't seen it here very often either) and Lindt is basically only the "cheap export stuff" you would be surprised how much better chocolate can get ;)
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Due to climate change, Germany will become Spain (and Spain will become north of Africa) by 2050. So, perhaps the north of Sweden would suit better.
> Due to climate change, Germany will become Spain (and Spain will become north of Africa) by 2050. Where do you people get that nonsense from?
As long as we are not talking WW3, Russia is hands down best place to be, it could easily stay cohesive with a lower standard of living, has been switching to internal supply chains for a decade now, has swaths of empty land and population not foreign to a concept of living off land, but most importantly it is under populated. Low population density - check Good defense - check Cultural and societal background necess…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_on_the_Far_Eastern_Hectare
What's the best place to live in 2050 for a black person?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wouldn't bet on Sweden in 2050, they're heading for a demographic collapse.
What makes you think so? Their projections seem to disagree: https://www.scb.se/en/finding-statistics/statistics-by-subje...