What most backend devs want is to write code and stick it behind a URI endpoint and make sure it keeps running with networking, auth, security, monitoring, scaling, and reliability taken care of by someone else.
Ask HN: What do you think will come after Kubernetes?
41–50 of 176 posts
Re: Ask HN: What do you think will come after Kubernetes?
#42There will be languages to design distributed systems without having to manually design each component for it. The language rather allows generating interfaces which generate a monolith while certain parts are generated as microservices to scale.
Re: Ask HN: What do you think will come after Kubernetes?
#43Re: Ask HN: What do you think will come after Kubernetes?
#44Re: Ask HN: What do you think will come after Kubernetes?
#45Hopefully we have more iteration on configuring k8s. I'm not convinced we'll so easily go back to managing instances with monoliths.
Re: Ask HN: What do you think will come after Kubernetes?
#46Re: Ask HN: What do you think will come after Kubernetes?
#47I think there will be a rise in monoliths and a trend towards reducing as much distributed state as possible. I think this will be driven by a few trends: - Very fast disks to store data SQLite style, auto replicated transparently at the disk level. - Typed languages becoming more usable (tooling and language improvements), which makes it easier to design and operate systems (stack traces vs distributed debugging/tra…
With kafka as the data source every instance was autonomous and would keep itself up to date using the kafka partition offsets.
Went really well, took the DB cluster out of the scaling equasion and offloaded a lot of the cost to the SSD instead of memory or a managed DB Cluster.
If eventual consistency is enough i feel that this is a nice way to handle things.
Re: Ask HN: What do you think will come after Kubernetes?
#48There will have to be something to solve all the problems that are created by Kubernetes, which itself exists to solve the problems with Docker, which exists to solve the problems with VMs, which exist to solve the problems with Operating Systems. I can't wait for the next layer of complexity to be added. It will no doubt be called something like WizzlyBobATron.
Tron?
The Master Control Program?
Re: Ask HN: What do you think will come after Kubernetes?
#49Realistically VMs, the toolsets are very mature, and it was an incredible waste to spend so much time getting them to work so well and then dumping all of it for containers. Which has you starting all over at zero again due to the lack of maturity, tooling that is all over the place and requires tons of elbow grease to integrate and make work for your use case.
Re: Ask HN: What do you think will come after Kubernetes?
#50Why do I need to build a container image when I can just list my dependencies and provide some code to run? For example: "I need Programming_Lang version 4.14, Library_A version 2.2, and Library_B version 1.5".
I don't care what the underlying operating system / system libraries are as long as it is fast and secure.
I just need to run my code. Why should I need to manage the rest as long as it works?