Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Crashed founders, what was the point of failure?

news.ycombinator.com

41–50 of 56 posts

Re: Ask HN: Crashed founders, what was the point of failure?

#42
post #3
post #2

I tried to build a Google Reader alternative when Google Reader was first about to die, well a bit prior to it because it was missing the idea of grouping similar articles. I started investing in the product but kept building instead of launching. By the time I had it all built and ready to run it was extremely slow, untested adequately at scale and I didn't have a way to make money on it. Also, I didn't have enough…

Thanks for sharing your experience! How much time do you think you would be willing to invest in a POC before getting your first customer? Yesterday I was thinking about the idea of automatically rejecting projects when the time spent surpasses revenue/users by x. Basically, if I can't prove that people want something after x hours of working on it, reject the work and move to the next project. It seems like automate…

I would just buy domains and put up landing pages. Anything that gets a sign up with pay. I'd start working on that. All my ideas would be small iterations of what I am thinking of.

For example, lately, I have noticed there are some amazing people out there who can't market their products as well as they should. Their reach is significantly lower than I would have imagined. So I have been reaching out to different folks and asking to invest with them. This way I would get their audience/reputation and I can utilize my technology skills.

Once I get the person I want to work with, I would probably do something as you suggested, with the (x), while I iterate on different ideas, setup landing pages to get people to sign up and then see what to build. The great part about doing this is that when the person signs up, there is already an existing product that they can use, so all I am doing is marketing an existing service in a different way, I wouldn't have to build anything new, and just focus on marketing, or actually go through and build out the entire ecosystem when signups increase.

To give you an example, there are many coaching services out there. Some of them are remarkable people but they aren't I.T. people so they may have 1,000 or 2,000 followers. There are also many counselors and upper management employees, or junior level employees, who don't understand how to move up in an organization and being able to reach them is critical for their growth. The idea is to get a few coaches who need an advertising platform, invest with them, then create a platform to advertise mentors in a niche field. Obviously this won't be for everyone because you need to invest a bit of money and not time early on.

Re: Ask HN: Crashed founders, what was the point of failure?

#43
There’s a pretty big opportunity cost to your time in life. It’s easy to get in sunk cost traps, including bad marriages and startups.

Life is short. Sometimes (as I learned) you need something new. Sometimes it just doesn’t seem to be working and being a kajillionare isn’t what’s most important in life. Sometimes whatever mission or product isn’t what you prioritize or even believe in anymore.

And that can be a good thing!

There’s nothing wrong with regularly reevaluating priorities. In fact too many people say they’re being “persistent” when they’re really just on autopilot and never gaining perspective. Some people are masochistically entrepreneurial by nature, and just go on autopilot doing that when it’s not a healthy thing for them to keep taking extreme professional risks all the time.

Re: Ask HN: Crashed founders, what was the point of failure?

#44
post #13

I started my first company last year, and it crashed & died in 5 months. The point of failure was when I burnt out and ran out of money in month 5. Looking back, the venture was doomed from the beginning. I think it was due to a lack of structure: * No daily routines to take care of my physical & mental health (working 0-16 hrs a day on 3 coffees is not good haha) * No systems in place to socialize (sometimes I'd go…

I think this is a great way to approach starting companies. I hope you didnt have to go through poverty due to lack of an income on those 5months. But I am sure that the learning experience and the ability to align tech and business goals will payoff. I didnt go through the struggle so I dont understand your struggle fully but I hope those 5months served as a great management course.

Re: Ask HN: Crashed founders, what was the point of failure?

#45

Marketer and 7 time company founder/C-suite member. Every time a company fails, it's a function of one of two things: 1. A lack of a product people will pay for, reliably delivered in a way they're willing to accept. If people won't buy your thing, you don't have a business, you have a hobby. 2. Poor financial acumen leading to costs being higher than turnover. Unless a business actually turns a net profit, it's not…

Knocking down assumptions and attacking your ideas is a great thing. Very useful when done right but most ideas are shit and will collapse under careful analysis so people dont do it as much because it can be discouraging. But this thing has a formal name - Red Teaming. DoD wrote a great memo on how to do it right. There are other tools to solidify and stress test ideas such as simulation and game-play. I came across these while reading Farsighted. Excellent book.

Re: Ask HN: Crashed founders, what was the point of failure?

#46
post #19

Product - market fit was the root cause every time. Every situation is different but if there aren’t buyers it just won’t work. Interesting enough that the successful exit was because of astute cap table management. The founder was very ruthless about managing the cap table and negotiating to maintain a huge amount of equity, which turned into a fairly good exit for the founders / execs / early engineers despite a re…

I mean essentially people pay for something of value. Customers will pay for your product if its great. Acquirers will pay for the assets like brand value or IP. Building a startup for acquisition is also just fine. Atleast you come out stronger in the end.

Re: Ask HN: Crashed founders, what was the point of failure?

#47
Serial founder here.

Actual Points of Failure

1) First Company: When I realized the business couldn't scale on my expertise and hours alone. I would never be able to bootstrap enough money to hire/train my first employee. I saw myself charging hourly for this highly-specific and difficult work, forever. I packed my bags and literally moved out-of-state to get a fresh start after realizing this. The company was very profitable until the day I stopped answering calls.

2) Next Company: I couldn't find product market fit. It was cool tech, but there was no income after 6 months of work, no customers, and no foreseeable way to monetize the idea without a miracle. Running a simple business plan is difficult enough; there's no reason to think some Rube Goldberg type of business plan is going to work.

3) Next Company: I found product market fit after 6 months. There were paying customers, a scaleable business model, but I had to be careful how I operated and the industry was dangerous. I figured out exactly what I had to do to succeed and made a pretty penny finding product-market fit, but then quit cold-turkey once things were crystal clear this was the product/service direction.

Failure is just a step in the learning process. Here are some hard-learned lessons:

a) If you build it; nobody will care. If you market it, nobody will care. If you try to give it away for free, nobody will care. EVERYTHING in this world is this difficult. You basically have to sell a commodity that has current demand if you want to get anywhere. If you don't see other businesses that sell your product or service it's because people won't pay for it.

b) I hate saying this: you NEED a business partner. If you build the product; the other person needs to talk to customers and sell it. You don't have enough time to handle everything when customers start calling. Forget this grand idea of training a handful of employees and letting your startup bootstrap itself. The person or people you work with need to be as invested as yourself.

c) A note on the business partner: This needs to be a very special kind of person. You WILL blow up on each other. You WILL have arguments. You WILL consider walking away from the entire business and them. This kind of person needs to be someone where if this happens; you both understand each other, can call each other an idiot, but you will ALWAYS be able to (eventually) drop the issue or figure out a solution.

d) After years of failure it's a little jarring hitting success. All of the sudden you are doubling-down on the business model instead of brainstorming the next pivot. You begin working out sticky scalability issues and operate in partial-failure mode as things start to accelerate and break, while your attention is on the biggest fire.

Final advice: become a cockroach. Blow past the end of your runway and keep going. You'll still be alive when you run out of cash, so get creative and keep moving forward. What would you expect it to cost to build a successful company? It takes everything you have to give, for decades. Just keep pivoting.

Re: Ask HN: Crashed founders, what was the point of failure?

#48

Marketer and 7 time company founder/C-suite member. Every time a company fails, it's a function of one of two things: 1. A lack of a product people will pay for, reliably delivered in a way they're willing to accept. If people won't buy your thing, you don't have a business, you have a hobby. 2. Poor financial acumen leading to costs being higher than turnover. Unless a business actually turns a net profit, it's not…

Knocking down assumptions and attacking your ideas is a great thing. Very useful when done right but most ideas are shit and will collapse under careful analysis so people dont do it as much because it can be discouraging. But this thing has a formal name - Red Teaming. DoD wrote a great memo on how to do it right. There are other tools to solidify and stress test ideas such as simulation and game-play. I came across…

It's also just basic hypothesis testing - formulating and then proving/disproving a null hypothesis. But most of the people I talk to can't remember what that means, if they ever knew. Hence assumptions and attacking as the language - they can work that out.

Also, Farsighted is a great book. If you liked it, you'd also get a kick out of Creating Great Choices, The Choice Factory, Alchemy: The Surprising Power of Ideas That Don't Make Sense, and How to Measure Anything: Finding the Value of Intangibles in Business.

Re: Ask HN: Crashed founders, what was the point of failure?

#49
I screwed up my life pretty badly by sticking with my startup for more than a decade. All that stuff about "Winners never quit..." I should have quit.

I kept it going in part because I had personally backed a large loan, which came due all at once when we finally folded. That was a very, very bad day for me. I managed to salvage it -- part of the reason I was able to last so long was that I'd had some successes during the dotcom boom. I lost all of that.

I failed to fail fast, which is easy to say in retrospect, but I would have been equally tsked at if I'd let it go without trying harder. Beyond a certain point (a few years) it was clearly just inertia and depression, and bad advice I got from people I brought in to be CEO.

We quit for real when our solitary customer dropped us. They never really understood what we were good for -- a story that I never managed to tell really well, despite still believing in it. The world went in exactly the opposite of the direction we aimed at: high quality data with powerful semantic reasoning.

I did everything wrong, and was really bad at it, including knowing when to quit. My life is going great now, and I'm incredibly fortunate, but if I had two pieces of advice it would be "Don't" and "Listen to your friends who tell you you're being stupid."

Re: Ask HN: Crashed founders, what was the point of failure?

#50
The one I see often is timing - if an idea is too early, the market isn't ready to adopt it. If it is too late, the problems are solved and the solutions are now commodities.

Success often boils down to getting the product to market at the time they are ready for it, yet before everyone else has figured it out.

Post reply on HN