Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Looking for a really lightweight Linux distro for my netbook

news.ycombinator.com

41–47 of 47 posts

Re: Ask HN: Looking for a really lightweight Linux distro for my netbook

#41
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I run Arch on my $175 eee PC and it works far better than any of the other distros that I've tried. It also helps A LOT to run a very light weight window manager. I've found the StumpWM (as a bonus written in Lisp) is a great fit, although Ratpoison would be good as well. Another advantage with StumpWM or Ratpoison is that they don't draw window borders and there is no task bar etc, so you have quite a bit more space…

Have you tried Debian? I run Debian on a desktop, but my sense is that its hardware support for netbooks lags a bit. I'd be interested to know how easy it is to get working on an Eee PC. (And the OP might as well: a Debian base install seems like it might be a nice compromise between the kitchen-sink approach in a base Ubuntu install and the configuration required by something like Arch -- though I don't really know.…

I'm very familiar with Debian (and Ubuntu), and Arch.

Unless you really need capitol S Stability, I would recommend running Arch, assuming you're comfortable with a unix environment, or willing to learn. It's a very clean minimalist distro, and there isn't very much to wrap your head around that isn't just common unix stuff.

Re: Ask HN: Looking for a really lightweight Linux distro for my netbook

#42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It runs very well on my Asus Eee PC 1000HE as well. http://www.ubuntu.com/netbook And I also prefer the 10.04 version to the 10.10 version. No idea what Ubuntu was thinking with that new space-wasting sidebar in 10.10. Can download the older version here: http://mirror.pnl.gov/releases/10.04/

They switched to a sidebar because all screens are widescreens now. Having toolbars on the top or bottom just worsens the situation. If your netbook screen is only 1024 x 600, you don't need to lose even more vertical resolution to a task bar.

A vertical auto-hide toolbar, to me, is much more convenient than the clunky sidebar with no customization options that you're stuck with in 10.10.

Re: Ask HN: Looking for a really lightweight Linux distro for my netbook

#44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They switched to a sidebar because all screens are widescreens now. Having toolbars on the top or bottom just worsens the situation. If your netbook screen is only 1024 x 600, you don't need to lose even more vertical resolution to a task bar.

A vertical auto-hide toolbar, to me, is much more convenient than the clunky sidebar with no customization options that you're stuck with in 10.10.

Agreed. It definitely needs an optional auto-hide for those of us who use Gnome-Do and the like.

Imho that's the ultimate solution to limited screen real-estate on netbooks and tablets - no more menu at all, replaced by an easy hotkey that pops up a panel with all the functionality and information you need.

Menu bars are relics, but maybe the UX designers making these decisions think that's too much of a departure from what most of their users already know?

Post reply on HN