Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Secure automated backup?

news.ycombinator.com

41–50 of 89 posts

Re: Ask HN: Secure automated backup?

#41
For local bootable backup I use Mac Backup Guru, which I also wrote: https://macdaddy.io/mac-backup-software/ It's useful because it's the only software on OS X besides Time Machine which makes versioned (incremental) backups using hardlinks.

For remote backup I use Arq, but I have found that to be very buggy. I'm considering switching to rclone: https://rclone.org/

With both of those backup solutions in place I should be ready for pretty much everything.

Re: Ask HN: Secure automated backup?

#42
post #41

For local bootable backup I use Mac Backup Guru, which I also wrote: https://macdaddy.io/mac-backup-software/ It's useful because it's the only software on OS X besides Time Machine which makes versioned (incremental) backups using hardlinks. For remote backup I use Arq, but I have found that to be very buggy. I'm considering switching to rclone: https://rclone.org/ With both of those backup solutions in place I shou…

Can you elaborate how Arq is buggy? I'm considering switching to Arq from Crashplan, because I supply my own storage for it anyway.

Re: Ask HN: Secure automated backup?

#43

I'm surprised that no one mentioned Tarsnap yet, it's run by a well known HNer (cperciva): http://www.tarsnap.com/ It's not exactly noob friendly though.

Duplicity does everything that Tarsnap does, but it's free software and you can point it at whatever storage you want, including your own disks (optionally over an SSH connection), or Amazon S3.

It's really easy to set up too: https://www.grepular.com/Secure_Free_Incremental_and_Instant...

Re: Ask HN: Secure automated backup?

#44
post #42
post #41

For local bootable backup I use Mac Backup Guru, which I also wrote: https://macdaddy.io/mac-backup-software/ It's useful because it's the only software on OS X besides Time Machine which makes versioned (incremental) backups using hardlinks. For remote backup I use Arq, but I have found that to be very buggy. I'm considering switching to rclone: https://rclone.org/ With both of those backup solutions in place I shou…

Can you elaborate how Arq is buggy? I'm considering switching to Arq from Crashplan, because I supply my own storage for it anyway.

I have had to restore a backup once, so I restored the most recent version, which was restoring an old version of the file. I ended up frantically restoring all the different versions of the backups, and one of them was the most recent version. But it was considered an old version by Arq, I'm not sure precisely which one, but it definitely wasn't in the top 3 most recent ones.

And more recently I made a backup to glacier, and it is trapped in "in progress", even though it appears that it may (or may not) be complete.

I haven't used it much, maybe 6 times, and 2 of the times it's had these catastrophic problems I'm talking about. I'm going to switch to another solution. I was considering rclone (like I mentioned) or Crashplan, ironically.

Re: Ask HN: Secure automated backup?

#46
Most importantly: it must be the backup server that has to log into your computer to backup, and not the other way around. That way, if your computer/server is compromised, the backups are still there. If you make the error to connect to the backup server, a hacker could also log into it and delete everything.

I my backup server uses rsnapshot and you can only log into it with ssh + key + OTP.

Re: Ask HN: Secure automated backup?

#48
post #35

3-2-1 rule. I would use time machine capsule and periodically (weekly?) connect an encrypted external drive and Borg backup there. Next week a second drive, third week the first one... Always keep one of this drive off-site. This is just one of many options how to get reasonably safe (I use an almost this one just deja-dup instead of time machine.)

I also use deja-dup but lately it seems to choke when trying to determine what to back up (I have about 175 GB of files, which doesn't seem outrageous). Have you had any issues with the speed? It could be that I have a long history saved on my backup drive and it's trying to apply too many incremental diffs.

I have no idea. Anything in logs? Maybe move backups to an other location and start a new backup repo to see what happens?

Re: Ask HN: Secure automated backup?

#49
post #12

I use Arq ( https://www.arqbackup.com ) with Amazon Drive (unlimited data for $60/year) for this

I also use Arq but send to rsync.net with reduced pricing (http://rsync.net/products/attic.html) in addition to SFTPing to a personal (offsite) server.

Additionally, I run Backblaze and use Carbon Copy Cloner roughly once a week back to clone my entire drive to an external drive.

For personal servers I use borg with the same reduced rsync.net pricing.

Re: Ask HN: Secure automated backup?

#50
post #5

I use borg[0] to create local space efficient encrypted backups and rclone[1] to mirror the archives to Google Drive. I wrote a short script to automate it and schedule it to run every night. [0] https://borgbackup.readthedocs.io/en/stable/ [1] https://rclone.org

Currently at $WORK using Attic (which Borg was forked from), with plans to migrate to Borg.

At home, rsync to NAS and ZFS snapshots.

Post reply on HN