Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What has your work taught you that other people don't realize?

news.ycombinator.com

391–400 of 757 posts

Re: Ask HN: What has your work taught you that other people don't realize?

#391
post #292

Earlier quoted context omitted.

how do you think about politics and capitalism than? can the system still be simplified enough to grasp it well enough to change it? where would an individual who has grasped it find the power to change anything? capitalism seems super stable for now one of the most sad thoughts I heard: if you try to change the system to the better you might keep it from hitting the wall and actually stabilize it

It's clear it doesn't work perfectly - depression rates in capitalist countries are very high, salaries are still a problem, even when GDP improves. The Communist revolution took off all over the world, but later everyone learned that communism isn't better. All change takes time and energy. I think we're still missing a great economic thinker who can try to solve it. We've put a lot of our energy into things like el…

> All change takes time and energy. I think we're still missing a great economic thinker who can try to solve it.

We’ve known that the economy is an intractable problem for a lot longer than I’ve been alive. Capitalism approximates an efficient solution. There’s a large economics and computer science literature on this if you’re interested, or for a fictional treatment you could read Red Plenty, Francis Spufford, which is an historical novel covering the theory in the historical background it was developed in[1].

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_calculation_debate

> The socialist calculation debate, sometimes known as the economic calculation debate, was a discourse on the subject of how a socialist economy would perform economic calculation given the absence of the law of value, money, financial prices for capital goods and private ownership of the means of production. More specifically, the debate was centered on the application of economic planning for the allocation of the means of production as a substitute for capital markets and whether or not such an arrangement would be superior to capitalism in terms of efficiency and productivity.

[1] http://crookedtimber.org/category/red-plenty-seminar/

Multiple erudite articles riffing on a great book, from economic and other perspectives.

Re: Ask HN: What has your work taught you that other people don't realize?

#392
post #327

How important it is to be able to inhabit another person's viewpoint and see things from their perspective. So much time and effort is saved in doing so. Much of my job has become translating and mediating between stakeholders going around in circles, because each one believes their viewpoint represents the entirety of the issue. They can not understand one another because they assume the other understands everything…

This concept led to me almost losing my marriage, and what saved it. I had been interpreting all of my wife's actions according to why I would be acting that way, instead of trying to understand how she is justifying her actions.

Once I started asking more questions about her mindset, and really listening to her when she answered, the whole direction of my marriage changed for the better.

Re: Ask HN: What has your work taught you that other people don't realize?

#393

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> "You can figure out which lane is the fastest route, better than Google Maps can." Why do you think so? Given Google Maps has real time information about cars on both routes, I'd think it does a better job of aggregating this data than my intuition.

Google Maps has tried to route me through closed off bridges in the relatively recent past. I don't have a huge amount of confidence in the validity of its data.

It once asked me to drive my car along a bicycle path!

Re: Ask HN: What has your work taught you that other people don't realize?

#394

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've thought about this a lot, it's my goto "one day I'll write a book about this". I frame the problem slightly different (heh): Different disciplines, branching out, will (or so says my hypothesis) discover the same topologies, but express them differently due to different scopes (perspective, dimensionality, DSLs [...]). What I'm thinking about is: how can we parametrize the manifestations of these scopes, and, ub…

Consilience sprang to mind for me. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consilience_(book)

>Delivery date: 16 Jan 2020

Much appreciated!

Re: Ask HN: What has your work taught you that other people don't realize?

#395
It's easier to leave people frustrated then help them empathize or adjust their expectations.

I can only explain it by example:

Some people complain that they have a lot of trouble getting a job in the software field. Other people complain about why it's so hard to hire.

The reasons are very difficult to explain, but more importantly: No one wants to know the truth or bring empathy to the discussion!

I've had both struggles. (I've struggled to find a job, and I've struggled to hire.) If I try to explain why it's hard to get a job, from the perspective of someone who's hiring, I make people angry. If I try to explain why it's hard to hire, from the perspective of someone who's looking, I make people angry.

The simple, non-offensive answer, is that both job candidate and hiring company's expectations are unreasonable. More importantly, though, it's easier to leave people frustrated (in their job search or employee search) than to help them adjust their expectations.

Re: Ask HN: What has your work taught you that other people don't realize?

#397

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree. Americans get almost religious if you propose to only work a day per week. Much better to claim that the rest of your week was already fully booked, even though in reality you just don't need the additional money.

Heh, wasn't a 20-hours work week the American ideal of the future?

It was the marketing ploy used to sell consumerism and futurism. The reality turned out that now productivity expectations just got higher, rather than everyone getting more free time.

Re: Ask HN: What has your work taught you that other people don't realize?

#398
First impressions are much, much, much more important than anyone can imagine. You've been told they are important, but you may not realize how true that was. People like to make a decision about a person and it's incredibly difficult to change it once that happens, especially when that impression/decision was also shares among others. If you start a new job and do really well at the onset and everyone thinks highly of you, it's insanely hard to get rid of that even if you were to completely botch something. You could come up with some reason and everyone is likely to assume that reason is true and needs to be addressed rather than the problem having been you. Similarly, digging yourself out of a hole from a bad impression is perhaps even harder.

The value of hard work is also understated. Most people do what they need to do and that's it. They also don't really internalize the challenges the company faces. If you take that one, you are far more likely to succeed in your job. It's not just about "hard work" but an entire mind set that most people simply don't have. If you have it, it seriously pays off.

Related to the previous point - working a bit longer also really pays off. This is different but related to the previous point. There is definitely a non-linear increase in earnings once your surpass the standard work hours. Spend an extra 5-10 hours a week on your job or side project/business pays off much more.

You can either work "smart" or work hard. Technically, you can do both but hardly anyone does. The few that do, however, are absolute rock stars.

No one checks anything. Everyone just assumes everyone else is doing their job and doing it properly. Even if checking things is part of someone else's job, it's usually done half-assed. Actually verifying the important stuff (and sometimes the less-important stuff) opens up a world of potential where your business discovers all kinds of missed opportunities, incorrect work, etc.

Most people are bad at math. And most people are also financially illiterate. Which by extension makes a huge majority of people really, really terrible at personal finance and financial planning (for themselves or their business). This also applies to a lot of smart and successful people.

Every organizational structure that human beings create yields towards tyranny/abuse over time. Doesn't matter what you are talking about - government, business, anything. Over time nearly everything somehow seems to become these oligopolistic style structures where there are a few hugely powerful entities and then everyone else.

Related to the previous point, far more things follow the pareto distribution than I could have imagined. In fact it seems to apply to anything that either has any creative aspect to it at all or to non-creative endeavors if they have any sort of scalability to them. There's a small group of people that are so insanely efficient and productive that it's almost impossible to comprehend. For example, I used to work with a guy who was working full time with me and started his own side business which was an online SaaS that he paid someone to create for him after he wrote up all the requirements and he did all the testing. While this was going on he also spent every free second trading cryptocurrencies and made a small fortune doing that. When the product was ready he launched it and manually sought out retail (end consumer) clients one by one via things like Discord chat rooms where he would pump his software that was tailored to individuals. He spoke to literally thousands and thousands of people and convinced them to sign up. Then he had a recurring monthly revenue which dwarfed his (already high) salary so he quit to pursue it. He continued to get clients and now has north of 15,000, most manually acquired. He's working on launching a sister product now. It baffles me how he can even do like half of what he does.

In business, managers are very hesitant to grant permission but much more likely to grant forgiveness for not following procedure. So in many cases it is usually better to just do whatever it is you think is best for the business and try to improves things however you can if the rules are (or will) prevent you. The personal boost here is also that your manager also thinks your plate is fully loaded with whatever it is they've already assigned to you. Then you shock them with this big thing you've also been working on and they're shocked you were able to take that on. Win/win.

There was more that I had, but I forgot it while writing the rest above. But I suppose that's enough blather from me today.

Re: Ask HN: What has your work taught you that other people don't realize?

#399

"Everybody is a little bit right" I was taught it by a former colleague but it was probably coined by someone else. We often think that if two views do not agree, one must be right and the other wrong when in most cases, every idea is a trade-off and everyone is therefore a little bit right. We might be able to find a middle-ground solution or just accept that our idea isn't always chosen.

Somehow related: Sometimes the compromise is worse than either extreme.

Re: Ask HN: What has your work taught you that other people don't realize?

#400
post #290
post #236

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I spend a lot of time making my consulting invoices look good, because it seems to justify my rates and impresses the payroll department, who then pays me sooner.

How do you make an invoice look good? Fancy letter head?

Same way legal departments dress up what are more or less informal requests in high language and good production values.

Old manager coined it "the power is in the template", big difference in response rate between an informal handwritten request & a proper looking 'official' request to comply.

Post reply on HN