Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What do you think about the no-code movement?

news.ycombinator.com

371–380 of 404 posts

Re: Ask HN: What do you think about the no-code movement?

#371
It's still coding, just more high-level. I think it misguides energy a bit. Just make regular programming more high-level, but don't try to hide all code and loose direct access to it.

Then again for some applications it works great: website designers, simple chatbots etc.

Re: Ask HN: What do you think about the no-code movement?

#372

The ultimate "low code" experience I had was back in the 1990s with Delphi. You drag and drop your form elements, get everything just right. Next you hook up your event handlers and type in a few lines of code to do the actual work. It was the best I've ever seen balance of managing complexity, yet letting you write code when you needed to. The C++ version was nowhere near as god, it generated a ton of templates and…

It's been 10 years now, but the Visual Studio GUI/Winforms designer was (probably still is) similar - and being .NET, you could get some pretty decent software up and running without too much code - depending on which language you used.

Re: Ask HN: What do you think about the no-code movement?

#373
post #360
post #10

It's interesting, but always calibrate their claims against the fact this is about the tenth time this movement has come around. This movement literally goes back to COBOL. That is not a typo. It's not only likely older than you are, but probably much older than you are. I recognize COBOL may not seem like "no-code", but that's just because "no-code" is a stupid label. "No-code" doesn't mean "no code" just like "serv…

COBOL never claimed to be "no code", but what it did claim was that it would significantly lower the level of training required to program. Which it absolutely did. Before compilers, you had to program in machine code which was extremely tedious and error prone and required a detailed understanding the microprocessor and computer architecture. COBOL may seem clunky compared to modern languages, but the productivity i…

Well and having to maintain legacy code written by people who had received only little training.

Re: Ask HN: What do you think about the no-code movement?

#374
recycled trend, nothing is new here. "the cloud" started as no code if you still remember. At some point, clicking around a web console frustrated us so much we created tools like ansible, terraform, cloud formation etc. I would not take this mob seriously before they start taking about the code review and testing workflow.

Re: Ask HN: What do you think about the no-code movement?

#376
It seems like the period when this idea hit its peak was in the late 1980s and early 1990s. That's when there were a lot of apps built to maximize what non-programmers could do, and which also offered the easiest possible on-ramp for people who did want to write simple scripts. Among the big successes of that time:

Hypercard

Macromedia Director, which later evolved into Flash

VisualBasic, which had fantastic WYSIWYG tools for interfaces

A little later:

Dreamweaver

PageMill

All the early Web tools (there were hundreds)

It is difficult to now remember the cult that existed around Hypercard for awhile, and which lead to spin off products, like SuperCard.

There was a real mania at that time to make it easy for everyone to learn the basics of programming.

At some point after 2000, and especially after 2010, the idea seemed to fade, and the tech industry for awhile got caught up in going in a very different direction: big frameworks, increasingly complex, increasingly abstract, a development system that required more and more tools.

I would like to see some of the old "education for the masses" energy come back.

Re: Ask HN: What do you think about the no-code movement?

#377
post #107

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Things we agree on: ignore everything no-code proponents say about their tools or capabilities Things we disagree on: code before no code My experience has been that actual code is always superior* to no-code, because no-code is always more complex. E.g. the no-code developer environment + code (in whatever designer form) + interpreter / runtime / libraries + any integrations + actual generated code. Consequently, bu…

SQL is no/low-code compared to using a low-level database like BDB for a given level of power. And yet it's much simpler for most use cases. By the same token, C is low-code compared to assembler, Python is low-code compared to C, and Steel Bank Common Lisp is low-code compared to Python.

Using the same kind of reasoning, JavaScript is a framework and JQuery is no code. Or maybe React and Angular are no code and JQuery is low code? We basically need a firm, objective basis for determining what a thing is. The question is: what is it?

Re: Ask HN: What do you think about the no-code movement?

#378
I don't like it because it is marketing scam term.

In reality there is so much no-code/low-code solutions already there in place. Whole Wordpress ecosystem with plugins - you basically can do webshop in couple clicks, if you are writing webshop from scratch then you are stupid.

Then there are pointy haired bosses who think they can substitute their developers with low code. That is also stupid because their company probably needs developers. Like if they are SaaS provider - they ARE low code for other businesses and replacing developers with some low code will make company to be simply reseller of someone else business.

If you are SaaS vendor - you are low code provider for other businesses and from what I see many managers don't understand it and think they can make money on someone else solution.

Re: Ask HN: What do you think about the no-code movement?

#380

I have been a professional programmer for forty years. In the eighties, there was a no-code desktop relational database application called Helix. I continue to think that it belongs on the same shelf as Excel in the UI hall of fame. Like Excel, people made applications with it. Unlike Excel, it created a server product in the mid-eighties that allowed it to become an IT platform. Small business owners who had hacked…

Remember Omnis? That was fun to code in, hard to maintain.
Post reply on HN