Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What are these low quality “code snippet” sites?

news.ycombinator.com

311–320 of 323 posts

Re: Ask HN: What are these low quality “code snippet” sites?

#311

uBlacklist is a great tool to block sites you don't want from showing up on your search results on google (and a couple others including bing and duckduckgo). It supports regular expressions as well, I use /pinterest\..*/ to block all pinterest-related content. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ublacklist/ https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/ublacklist/pncfbmi...

Great thanks, it even supports iOS. Will try it!

https://github.com/iorate/uBlacklist

Re: Ask HN: What are these low quality “code snippet” sites?

#312
post #90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I also a lot of strange domains (.it, .so) and tangential related domainnames. Clicking it gives a really weird content scraped jumble that seems AI generated. My malware extension also went on alert. And this is in the top ten in a search result!

I see tons of "non-standard" TLDs now, even in articles posted here, and I'm always wary of visiting them. To be perfectly honest, I tend to completely ignore TLDs with more than 3 characters.

Yeah, in general I do too.

Re: Ask HN: What are these low quality “code snippet” sites?

#313

For years now I've ran a programming site (stackabuse.com) and have closely followed the state of Google SERPs when it comes to programming content. A few thoughts/ramblings: - The search results for programming content has been very volatile the last year or so. Google has released a lot of core algorithm updates in the last year, which has caused a lot of high-quality sites to either lose traffic or stagnate. - The…

Please consider releasing any paywalled content after some deadline, e.g., after a year. It makes content practically inaccessible to a lot of people, including non-adults and people in developing countries.

Re: Ask HN: What are these low quality “code snippet” sites?

#315

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Precisely. For me, the value in paying for a course or a book is not that they produce this knowledge, but that they collate it, filter through subject matter experience they already have to remove misleading additions, and add in any missing parts that may take a long time to grasp without a "Eureka!"-inducing explanation.

The service worth paying for is turning the collection of facts into usable information.

Exactly. Filtering information from misinformation is also a good selling point.

Re: Ask HN: What are these low quality “code snippet” sites?

#316
post #67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Google used to make it possible to filter domains from results. I was sad to see it disappear

You can still do "-site:spam.com".

This works, but bad actors like pinterest have found a way around that by having a domain on every TLD and ccTLD out there.

Re: Ask HN: What are these low quality “code snippet” sites?

#317
post #192

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Try this, the exact query I was referring to. I leave it to the reader to decide which is better.. The top 2 Google results are scrapped clones (or whatever they should be called) of the 1st result from DDG (Github issues #162 for docker-calibre-web) The closest Google comes in top 4 links is a link to the entire Github issues for docker-calibre-web DDG: https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=FakeUserAgentError+calibre-...…

Interestingly, as of 02 December 2021 ~0300 US/Eastern, this thread is the third entry in your Google search. It doesn't appear at all on the first page of the DDG results.

Wow, I checked and that is the funniest thing ever and totally unexpected!!

FWIW, I see it as 4th item in Google search results, but that is not important. It's just weird that that will show up at all.

Again, I'll say, that's a win for DDG results, at least IMveryHO.

Re: Ask HN: What are these low quality “code snippet” sites?

#318
post #133

Somewhat tangential but I believe Google Search is going downhill, they seem to be losing the content junk spam SEO fight. Recently, I've had to append wiki/reddit/hn to queries I search for because everything near the top is shallow copied content marketing.

The other day, I searched for something and got a whole HN thread copied to some crap site but it had just enough veneer to seem legit. I figured it out when I searched for something from that thread and found the actual original HN thread that had way more context. Google has been good to me overall, but in the past few weeks I've really noticed the SEO spam, and I'm not sure what to do about it so that I don't find…

> found the actual original HN thread that had way more context.

So the nitwits just harvested too early, before the HN discussion was fully grown?

Re: Ask HN: What are these low quality “code snippet” sites?

#319

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Google Search has been going downhill _fast_ over the past 5 years or so. Since it's probably incompetence rather than malice, what the heck is going on at Google Search? It seems to me the "let's use AI for everything" camp has taken over the entire place even though it's making Search worse than it ever was. And please spare me the excuse that now Google can answer questions. It can't, it just answers with snippets…

If I search "who gave away Anne Frank's hiding place?", Google confidently gives me the answer "Miep Gies". I don't know why Google would even suggest this -- Miep was one of Anne's helpers. Imagine all the other people out there having their names unfairly smeared by Google's algorithm.

You have to ask the really hard questions. Like the ones every 5 yo could answer without thinking. E.g. try: "What can you do with a car/book/gun?"

Be suprised the answer isn't drive/read/shoot^^.

Re: Ask HN: What are these low quality “code snippet” sites?

#320

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wonder if we'll see a comeback of hand-curated directories of content? I feel like the "awesome list" trend is maybe the start of something there. I would be willing to pay an annual fee to have access to well-curated search results with all the clickbait, blogspam, etc. filtered out. Until then, I recommend uBlacklist[0], which allows you to hide sites by domain in the search results page for common search engines…

The trouble is, how do you prevent Sybil attacks? The spammers might vote for their own sites https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sybil_attack

would be better if my votes only affect my search result
Post reply on HN