If you aren't using tmux or screen, you probably should be, especially over SSH sessions. They allow you to have multiple consoles open and switch between them, split window, and disconnect from SSH and then reconnect with all your things still open and running (as long as the server stayed running).
As someone who hasn't invested much time into tmux/screen, what are the benefits of it over just using eg; multiple terminal tabsn or using the terminal's built in split windowing? I'm sure there's probably a benefit but I dunno what it is
Ask HN: Best Command-Line Applications?
301–310 of 393 posts
Re: Ask HN: Best Command-Line Applications?
#302I use `ack` ( https://beyondgrep.com/ ) as a replacement for `grep`. It is simpler, faster, it has colors by default and it's really fast and very useful for programming.
Re: Ask HN: Best Command-Line Applications?
#303Just about every Rust cli app written by sharkdp: https://github.com/sharkdp/fd https://github.com/sharkdp/bat https://github.com/sharkdp/diskus https://github.com/sharkdp/hyperfine For viewing csv's as tabular, paged data from the terminal, check out VisiData (python) https://github.com/saulpw/visidata
Re: Ask HN: Best Command-Line Applications?
#304asdf: https://github.com/asdf-vm/asdf - installs many different programming languages and supports installing different versions concurrently. I use it for go installs since distribution updates aren't usually fast enough.
solaar: https://github.com/pwr/Solaar - handles configuring a logitech unifying receiver in Linux. Not really something you'd use multiple times, but am thankful it exists (also has a GUI too I believe).
Re: Ask HN: Best Command-Line Applications?
#305I use the following (in no particular order) -- definitely nothing fancy. * weechat * ffmpeg * youtube-dl * zsh * watchman ( https://facebook.github.io/watchman ) * megadl (rarely, but its a handy tool when you need it) * brew (on my mac) * mountsshfs (on my mac) --- I moved away from orgmode and have been using it in VS since I have it open anyway. It covers me. I also want to start using Mutt or something similar.…
Just for curiosity: you have moved away from Emacs org-mode? If yes may I ask why? I'm using Emacs since few times and it's now even my WM and org-mode is it's companion for nearly all docs/docs related stuff I use, never found anything even near comfortable and powerful as that combo...
The VS one covers the basics and has treated me well. For more advanced org-mode folks, I don't think the VS org-mode would be enough.
Re: Ask HN: Best Command-Line Applications?
#306netcat
Re: Ask HN: Best Command-Line Applications?
#307ddrescue - GNU ddrescue (https://www.gnu.org/software/ddrescue/) not to be confused with dd_rescue (http://www.garloff.de/kurt/linux/ddrescue/) This piece of software is outstandingly good for rescuing bits from failing spinning rust. It doesn't care about the filesystem, it just tries really hard to get data from a raw device. Once you've got all the bits onto a safer medium, you can use testdisk to explore the disk image.
Re: Ask HN: Best Command-Line Applications?
#308Some level of balance is needed, which is what I've been trying to do. That said I always setup oh-my-zsh and `git config --global alias.kurwa status` wherever I go.
Re: Ask HN: Best Command-Line Applications?
#309Earlier quoted context omitted.
it's nice to see new approaches to email in a terminal. how about integration with notmuch? greetings, eMBee.
I think the people that enjoy notmuch would probably prefer to stick with what they know. If I were to use their query-based API, and just be a UI on it, then that'd be an almost complete rewrite.
commandline UI development in particular seems very conservative, and attempts to explore new interfaces are rare. that's why i love this topic and am getting excited about any attempt to change that.
i obviously can't comment on what it takes to integrate notmuch with lumail, and i grant that one may possibly have to develop a mailclient with notmuch in mind for it to work well.
greetings, eMBee.
Re: Ask HN: Best Command-Line Applications?
#310Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've been using Spacemacs for a while, what sets Doom Emacs apart?
I am a convert from Spacemacs to Doom, and I have found that one of the main differences that sets Doom apart is easier configurability than Spacemacs. In Doom, there is still the concept of "layers," but IMO it is much easier to figure out what the layers are doing and customize them from there. Also, I have found Doom to be much quicker (takes about 2 seconds to load, not using server/client) and less buggy than Sp…