Ask HN: Do you feel comfortable admitting that you use AI?
31–38 of 38 posts
Re: Ask HN: Do you feel comfortable admitting that you use AI?
#32Re: Ask HN: Do you feel comfortable admitting that you use AI?
#33In my personal life, I don't touch it.
Re: Ask HN: Do you feel comfortable admitting that you use AI?
#34Re: Ask HN: Do you feel comfortable admitting that you use AI?
#35Re: Ask HN: Do you feel comfortable admitting that you use AI?
#36There is a segment of people who have both legitimate concerns and misconceptions about AI. The legitimate concerns are crucial and certainly need to be addressed, some are existential. But if you're a person who refuses to AI, you are not long for a technology career.
As for their hangups and misconceptions, that’s their baggage to deal with. Just stay out of my way.
Re: Ask HN: Do you feel comfortable admitting that you use AI?
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, it's not like that at all. A calculator uses known deterministic algorithms to compute an answer. As long as you stay within the precision bounds, you'll get reliable and correct answers 100% of the time. An AI is the result of randomness put through a simulated evolution, each one is different. We tend to expect them all to be the same, but that would be like redoing the big-bang until present, and expecting the…
Are you familiar with the idea of probabilistic algorithms? Determinism can be a liability.
The point I was trying to make is that a calculator never guesses at the answer, it's got an algorithm instead of a mass of predictions.
Re: Ask HN: Do you feel comfortable admitting that you use AI?
#38I run three companies and I've noticed the discomfort shows up when someone can't answer "what did YOU decide here?" If your AI drafted the code, the email, the strategy, that's where I feel like people have lost the plot. If you can't defend the decision behind it, that's where the wobble comes from.
It's the same thing when growing a company. You don't outsource every decision to each individual contributor. You need mission vision and values + strategic thinking coming from the leaders to lead the team. Same with agents.
The devs on my team who ship the most are the ones who treat AI like a very fast junior, they still own the diff. The ones who feel weird are usually the ones who shipped something they don't fully understand.
Disclosure: I'm building in the AI-assistant-for-founders space, so I talk to a lot of people about this. The pattern is consistent across roles, not just dev.