[flagged]
https://www.orwell.ru/library/articles/As_I_Please/english/e...
31–40 of 94 posts
[flagged]
https://www.orwell.ru/library/articles/As_I_Please/english/e...
When I first moved to the Bay Area, San Francisco was described by one person to me as "quite conservative actually." At the time, that seemed unlikely. However after a while, I can now see why this is the case.
If you had much empathy for the downtrodden you couldn't stand to live at the epicenter of the homelessness crisis.
I am not saying they would solve it, but they would make it some other community's problem.
All in all these are definitely not right wing opinions.
I have trouble taking people seriously when they use “fascist” as a blanket term to discredit people they don’t like.
I have trouble taking people seriously when they refuse to call things what they are because they don’t want to admit it.
Probably just best to focus on those qualities you don’t like on the other side and leave the labeling to the future historians.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you had much empathy for the downtrodden you couldn't stand to live at the epicenter of the homelessness crisis.
I am not 100% sure that your implication really tracks with conservative behaviors. I would say it would be more likely that non-empathetic conservatives would work pretty relentlessly to relocate homeless out of their communities rather than just ignore and co-exist with it. I am not saying they would solve it, but they would make it some other community's problem.
I noticed that too, so I used this as a test case: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44588392 it hours to get it flagged where a Trump/Musk criticism gets flagged in a few minutes. But it was flagged. I really really doubt HN is "pro-fascist", but I think it leans to the right because it is the rich that funds their projects.
Most HN users are tech employees or freelancers on salaries or contractor fees, so whatever political slant HN has aligns with that.
Posts about the U.S. administration and tech celebrities get flagged because people try and submit them every day and they lead to repetitive flamewar discussions, which is everything that HN is trying to avoid.
I have trouble taking people seriously when they use “fascist” as a blanket term to discredit people they don’t like.
To steal a few examples from a convenient summary list someone[1] made:
1. The cult of tradition. “One has only to look at the syllabus of every fascist movement to find the major traditionalist thinkers. The Nazi gnosis was nourished by traditionalist, syncretistic, occult elements.”
2. The rejection of modernism. “The Enlightenment, the Age of Reason, is seen as the beginning of modern depravity. In this sense Ur-Fascism can be defined as irrationalism.”
3. The cult of action for action’s sake. “Action being beautiful in itself, it must be taken before, or without, any previous reflection. Thinking is a form of emasculation.”
4. Disagreement is treason. “The critical spirit makes distinctions, and to distinguish is a sign of modernism. In modern culture the scientific community praises disagreement as a way to improve knowledge.”
...
10. Contempt for the weak. “Elitism is a typical aspect of any reactionary ideology.”
Open to other definitions. But I look at that list, written in 1995, and it feels like you can check off a lot of these items in things that are rapidly being normalised.
1. https://www.openculture.com/2024/11/umberto-ecos-list-of-the...
Are there pro-fascist posters here? Absolutely. I've seen full throated advocacy for some vile things here. The worst of it usually gets flagged.
Is there a strong correlation between flagging political posts and support for fascism? Not necessarily. Although some of that is definitely the HN Trumpist/right-wing contingent, this forum harbors a particular distate for anything not explicitly tech related (often beyond what the actual site guidelines state to be on topic) which includes politics of any kind.
And HN is designed so that flagging and downvoting has a much greater weight than upvoting, so it really doesn't even take much to tank a thread.
I have trouble taking people seriously when they use “fascist” as a blanket term to discredit people they don’t like.
If we didn’t flag a bunch of them, that’s all there would be. I like my HN with a side of politics, not the other way around.
I think the OP's question is what about when the story, while involving politics, is more about technology than anything else? I can see flagging it on the principle that even mildly political tech stories bring out the political rhetoric in the comments... is that a principle among the moderation (I would strongly support that if it is)?