31–40 of 81 posts
Can be called as smart bot or bot 2.0 or something, but agent is way too much. Nothing really is agentic in agents
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Replace the word “agent” with algorithm and I agree. Why overcomplicate things?
The difference is that algorithms have known inputs and “agent” implies a a greater level of adaptability to unforeseen inputs.
A decade ago, enterprises had quite a lot of roles involving essentially moving data from one ERP screen to another. From what I'm seeing, these roles seem to be quickly disappearing, with a combination of proper API-based automation, GUI automation and most recently LLM "agents" in crucial steps.
And on a very different note, I as a developer could ask an AI tool such as Aider or Windsurf to perform a big refactoring or other code change, working autonomously across code changes and shell commands until it passes all tests - this is agentic behavior that I didn't have even a year ago.
I too would like to hear some examples. On the one hand you have gurus claiming that AI agents are going to all make all SaaS redundant, on the other claiming that AI isn't going to take my coding job, but I need to adapt my workflows to incorporate AI. We all need to start preparing now for the changes that AI is going to cause. But these two claims aren't compatible. If AGI and these super agents are that bonkers a…
I need an AI agent to continuously ask questions of PMs or stakeholders until the requirements are less vague. The good thing is this would be a plain english discussion which LLMs are good at. A PM can ask if something is technically feasible to some degree too. Maybe it can even break up tickets in a much better fashion too.
They’ll just get mad at the AI and tell it to stop asking so many questions. As they already do to humans.
I've created agents for the following: - ICP / Sales Agent: I hired an offshore resource and built a GPT that they can send titles and other identifiers to, and it would say if it was in our ICP or not. I created it for a specific process that has outlined steps and FAQ from that person on things they have encountered, I plan on adding more questions and answers. This was super helpful on saving time on answering que…
What's wrong with an agent being a glorified workflow? At Temporal (where I work), it seems plenty natural for agentic AI to just be AI worklows. Here's a video we put out this week demonstrating it: https://youtu.be/GEXllEH2XiQ (code at https://github.com/steveandroulakis/temporal-ai-agent ).
What’s old is new again.
(Which is also why Salesforce is going big on agents. They acquired Mulesoft 8-years ago and agents are the next evolution of middleware)
What's wrong with an agent being a glorified workflow? At Temporal (where I work), it seems plenty natural for agentic AI to just be AI worklows. Here's a video we put out this week demonstrating it: https://youtu.be/GEXllEH2XiQ (code at https://github.com/steveandroulakis/temporal-ai-agent ).
OP wants to know if anyone is actually using this stuff productively, not if anyone has tech demos. We've all seen more than enough tech demos.
I too would like to hear some examples. On the one hand you have gurus claiming that AI agents are going to all make all SaaS redundant, on the other claiming that AI isn't going to take my coding job, but I need to adapt my workflows to incorporate AI. We all need to start preparing now for the changes that AI is going to cause. But these two claims aren't compatible. If AGI and these super agents are that bonkers a…
I need an AI agent to continuously ask questions of PMs or stakeholders until the requirements are less vague. The good thing is this would be a plain english discussion which LLMs are good at. A PM can ask if something is technically feasible to some degree too. Maybe it can even break up tickets in a much better fashion too.
Your requirements will improve, not sure if in the long I still need developers to build the actual software.
The development process with windsurf is a bit like throwing a dice, hoping for a 6. A lot of trial and error, but if you check the git log, you see about 15 minutes between commit per feature request. Windsurf does a good job to summarize the entire feature request chat into a short git commit message. Every git commit reads like a user story.
Here’s a a talk from a month ago that covers a few use cases that are definitely beyond simple glorified workflow automation. https://youtu.be/SpKtpW9TGF0?si=TRE6o7FfzCmhBuZq
It's also not really what people are promising with "agentic" because there's a human prompting and assisting it the entire time.