Sounds like they could be using your cash as funding. If they hold a bunch of cash from people it is effectively theirs for that period of time. This could prevent them from needing to raise a funding round if done enough. Some businesses are literally customer funded like these. If you want to read more search for "negative cash operating cycle".
Ask HN: Stripe holding funds for 120 days for no reason
31–40 of 124 posts
Re: Ask HN: Stripe holding funds for 120 days for no reason
#32You're fine with having payments refunded for (presumably) services rendered? Either it's not a business, but a mere hobby, or there is something to it you're keeping from us. Probably the former, but it makes me immediately suspicious, even with the recurring and well-documented "situation" with Stripe.
Re: Ask HN: Stripe holding funds for 120 days for no reason
#33They think their P99 customer service is great but 0.1% of their customers are experiencing a catastrophic level of experience and they simply don’t care. They are ignoring it because it doesn’t show up on any of their metrics or dashboards but it has a catastrophic effect on a small number of customers.
Companies like Stripe need a swat team that deals with these P999 catastrophes, but given their scale it’s probably cost prohibitive, so they just say “Fuck it.”
Re: Ask HN: Stripe holding funds for 120 days for no reason
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
The fact that OP (and many others) have felt they need to post on HN in order to escalate is a reflection of the fact that, however good Stripe support may be (and I've no doubt they are swamped, trying their best, etc.), it is clearly not "great." This is the third or fourth time just this month I've seen people at their wit's end, reaching out on HN because they have nowhere else to turn. As in the other posts, Edw…
I don't have to pretend Stripe Customer Support is great to know that Hacker News is the wrong place to whine about it. At least, it severely dilutes the intellectually gratifying content with banal, emotional diatribes. Every company experiences this, regardless of the quality of their customer support.
Re: Ask HN: Stripe holding funds for 120 days for no reason
#35On the topic of Stripe and these kinds of incidents more broadly, there’s a lot to say, but here are a few pieces of context that are probably relevant:
- We are a giant distributed bounty system for people to find interesting and scalable ways to defraud us.
- We’ve seen significant upticks in certain kinds of fraud over the past couple of months. When businesses default, Stripe takes on the loss. It’s worth noting that certain kinds of fraud, like card testing, can also have significant collateral costs for legitimate Stripe businesses, and our systems and processes are not only to protect Stripe itself.
- We are far from oblivious to the harm that mistakes in our systems can cause. (I interact with a lot of these cases personally.) One of my highest priorities is creating better appeals flows for when we’re wrong.
- We’ve shipped 7 substantial improvements just in the last 10 days that should meaningfully reduce the occurrence of false positives.
- Publicly-described facts of specific cases don’t always match the actual facts. Stripe is sometimes just wrong. (We made some mistakes that I feel bad about in one recent case and we ended up bringing the company’s founders to an all hands last week to make sure we learned as much as possible.) But users do also sometimes publicly misrepresent what’s going on. We’re also restricted by privacy rules to not share specifics in those cases.
- Stripe works with millions of businesses and we see all kinds of “rare” failure modes fairly frequently. (Disputes between staff at a business, business impersonation, businesses that start legitimate and go bad, and so on.)
- I’m working on a post to share some of our broader philosophy + policy changes that I hope to publish before the end of this year. In that, I’m also hoping we can share some relevant metrics. If HNers have any suggestions for things that might be useful to see covered (though obviously certain things can’t be publicly disclosed), feel free to suggest them.
Ultimately, we work hard to be worthy of the trust of businesses across the internet, and my personal mandate (supported by many others, from our cofounders down) is to find effective new ways of making mistakes less likely. “Uniformly good support at scale, in a highly adversarial environment, with very financially-motivated actors” is not easy, but I’m pretty confident that we can make a lot of progress.
It goes without saying we're working on a review of OP situation. I’m happy to take general questions as well. You can also always reach me directly at jhaddock@stripe.com.
Re: Ask HN: Stripe holding funds for 120 days for no reason
#36Sounds like they could be using your cash as funding. If they hold a bunch of cash from people it is effectively theirs for that period of time. This could prevent them from needing to raise a funding round if done enough. Some businesses are literally customer funded like these. If you want to read more search for "negative cash operating cycle".
> hold a bunch of cash from people it is effectively theirs In the U.S., I don’t think money transmitters are allowed to do this. (They can keep the interest earned on it.) Financing from deposits is more a crypto thing.
They are literally funding themselves out of deposits, in a small way if they keep any persons money for any period of time. If they start doing it to lots of people for months at a time then they are at least partially funding themselves from their customers.
Lots of businesses do this incidentally. A good one is businesses selling gift cards. It's not the same; but this set of conditions is not super uncommon.
Re: Ask HN: Stripe holding funds for 120 days for no reason
#37Sorry about this. Could you email me at edwin@stripe.com and I can dig in?
Re: Ask HN: Stripe holding funds for 120 days for no reason
#38I’m the person leading the project to make sure that people have fewer bad experiences with Stripe. I’m not sure what is driving the uptick in posts on the subject to HN in particular (obviously we pay attention to broader online discussion in addition to monitoring our support systems, though we know it creates an incentive for people to publicize their situation). On the topic of Stripe and these kinds of incidents…
No offence, but you're doing a bad job.
Re: Ask HN: Stripe holding funds for 120 days for no reason
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
> hold a bunch of cash from people it is effectively theirs In the U.S., I don’t think money transmitters are allowed to do this. (They can keep the interest earned on it.) Financing from deposits is more a crypto thing.
They can make stuff up, right? They are allowed to say "we are keeping your money for 120 days because of some security ...". Who is ever going to know this is valid/true or not, unless it goes to trial somehow and there is a lot of discovery done. They are literally funding themselves out of deposits, in a small way if they keep any persons money for any period of time. If they start doing it to lots of people for m…
No, they probably are not. It’s illegal and money transmitters are regulated.
What they are doing is collecting interest. One tends to see less scrupulous transmitters hold funds longer when rates rise. I didn’t think Stripe fell in this category, but it’s becoming difficult to say.
> good one is business selling gift cards
You’re right. (Also customer deposits.) This doesn’t apply to money transmitters, however.