Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Tips for Reducing the Number of Inboxes

news.ycombinator.com

31–40 of 87 posts

Re: Ask HN: Tips for Reducing the Number of Inboxes

#31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And receive unrelated spam? No thanks. While emails and texts are fine, I 100% would not trust linked in with push notifications

Who sends you personal messages on LinkedIn? Personally, I don't even trust LinkedIn to have an app installed on my phone. But I haven't received even a single spam notification from any of the major chat platforms.

Good for you. I get dozens a day.

Re: Ask HN: Tips for Reducing the Number of Inboxes

#32

The EU is planning to require big online messaging services to be interoperable. https://www.theverge.com/2022/3/24/22995431/european-union-d... This would solve it. Then you could simply use a single app. This is a political thing. So, vote for it, talk to the politicians.

I don't see how this is possible if you also have E2EE. Great example is email encryption via PGP. It exists, it's used (rarely) in some cases, but it's so poorly implemented to the point of being useless unless

It will be possible because the user will have the encryption key

Re: Ask HN: Tips for Reducing the Number of Inboxes

#33
post #21

I’ve seen this service recommended by some people - https://texts.com/ I haven’t used it myself but might be what you’re looking for.

> Texts charges users a monthly subscription to use the app. This is the _only_ reference to the pricing on their website. I'm not signing up to the app just to see what the pricing is, it's baffling they don't include that information on their main website.

The pricing was undecided since we're in private beta, just updated the FAQ.

Re: Ask HN: Tips for Reducing the Number of Inboxes

#34
For personal needs, I settled on a single email account (Google Workspace) that pulls emails from all my other accounts (acts as an email client) plus Signal which also handles texts. As for people who use Facebook/Messenger, WhatsApp, or Telegram, I just text them.

For professional needs, I'm also at a loss. I have Outlook, Slack, Signal/texts, Jira notifications, Confluence notifications, LinkedIn, MS Teams... and then Zoom, Google Meet, and Webex but these are at least scheduled. I never come across anyone using WhatsApp, Telegram, or Facebook/Messenger professionally but I'm sure it's coming and will be a joy.

I have seen people happy with Beeper[1] but I'm neither willing to hand over my keys, nor self-host it.

[1] https://www.beeper.com/

Re: Ask HN: Tips for Reducing the Number of Inboxes

#35

The EU is planning to require big online messaging services to be interoperable. https://www.theverge.com/2022/3/24/22995431/european-union-d... This would solve it. Then you could simply use a single app. This is a political thing. So, vote for it, talk to the politicians.

I don't see how this is possible if you also have E2EE. Great example is email encryption via PGP. It exists, it's used (rarely) in some cases, but it's so poorly implemented to the point of being useless unless

Why should this be an issue at all? It's my account, I should know the encryption key & algorithm. Any open source app can then implement this.

Re: Ask HN: Tips for Reducing the Number of Inboxes

#36
post #34

For personal needs, I settled on a single email account (Google Workspace) that pulls emails from all my other accounts (acts as an email client) plus Signal which also handles texts. As for people who use Facebook/Messenger, WhatsApp, or Telegram, I just text them. For professional needs, I'm also at a loss. I have Outlook, Slack, Signal/texts, Jira notifications, Confluence notifications, LinkedIn, MS Teams... and…

We work with lots of russian/ukrainian devs, and we're using Telegram.

Re: Ask HN: Tips for Reducing the Number of Inboxes

#37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't see how this is possible if you also have E2EE. Great example is email encryption via PGP. It exists, it's used (rarely) in some cases, but it's so poorly implemented to the point of being useless unless

Why should this be an issue at all? It's my account, I should know the encryption key & algorithm. Any open source app can then implement this.

How exactly would you implement an interoperable E2EE group chat app where you can arbitrarily add and remove people like with iMessage?

The EU law linked does not actually recommend anything specifically, just vaguely states interoperability being a goal.

Certain apps will have certain functionality. Unless you're willing to constrain the functionality it's not really possible.

Right now everyone could already use email which supports encryption. They don't, though.

Re: Ask HN: Tips for Reducing the Number of Inboxes

#39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Texts charges users a monthly subscription to use the app. This is the _only_ reference to the pricing on their website. I'm not signing up to the app just to see what the pricing is, it's baffling they don't include that information on their main website.

The pricing was undecided since we're in private beta, just updated the FAQ.

That was quick! Thanks for including the info in the FAQ now, it's much appreciated.

Re: Ask HN: Tips for Reducing the Number of Inboxes

#40
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Who sends you personal messages on LinkedIn? Personally, I don't even trust LinkedIn to have an app installed on my phone. But I haven't received even a single spam notification from any of the major chat platforms.

Good for you. I get dozens a day.

Are these first-party messages from the platform, or is it more akin to spam email where they're just letting through spam messages from spammers?
Post reply on HN