Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What email client do you prefer?

news.ycombinator.com

31–40 of 56 posts

Re: Ask HN: What email client do you prefer?

#33
post #12

My email productivity went through the roof when I switched to mu4e (Emacs interface to mu). I can in a few keystroke isolate the handful of emails that actually need my attention in the hundreds I receive every couple of days. Org mode integration allow me to reference those that I may need in the future, or that require later action in my to-do list. My time handling email is now reduced to 20min-2h every two days,…

How well does this setup cope with HTML mail?

Emacs can reasonably well display html, but when it fails I can open the email in a web browser in two keystrokes.

Re: Ask HN: What email client do you prefer?

#34
post #12

My email productivity went through the roof when I switched to mu4e (Emacs interface to mu). I can in a few keystroke isolate the handful of emails that actually need my attention in the hundreds I receive every couple of days. Org mode integration allow me to reference those that I may need in the future, or that require later action in my to-do list. My time handling email is now reduced to 20min-2h every two days,…

Being able to capture an email in mu4e into an org-mode entry really helps me keep track of what I'm supposed to be doing.

Re: Ask HN: What email client do you prefer?

#35

[dead]

Is this really aimed at providing an individual email client? I've used it in the past to send out bulk emails similar to Constant Contact (for example), and from their web site it appears their focus is still primarily on managing customer emails for business.

Re: Ask HN: What email client do you prefer?

#37
Thunderbird on Linux, K-9 Mail on Android.

My $WORKPLACE is using Outlook, so I use Thunderbird for Mail there too and always have a browser tab open with the OWA calendar [1]. Not the most elegant solution, but it's working fine for me.

[1] Tried several addons for Thunderbird with Outlook integration, decided I don't like any of them.

Re: Ask HN: What email client do you prefer?

#38
On Linux I used Astroid for offline mail access (notmuch + lieer for gmail and mbsync, I think, for other mailboxes - it worked so good that I don’t remember exactly). For me it is the best offline email setup.

On macOS, unfortunately, I haven’t found anything better than Apple Mail, considering the integration with OS. There are downsides, though. Offline format is incompatible with everything else, it’s hard to do rsync backups of ~/Library/Mail, and I don’t think all mail is accessible offline. It is slow, and it mangled non-latin attachment names for Gmail letters. On positive side, there is a great support for drag&drop, Spotlight integration, multiple account handling.

Re: Ask HN: What email client do you prefer?

#39
post #2

Thunderbird https://www.thunderbird.net

It is usable for me only with expression search NG (https://github.com/opto/expression-search-NG). TB is my daily driver but with every update I fear that they will destroy sth again: expression search failed to work for over a year due to their breaking changes. Switched to another extension until that one stopped working. Now back on expression search as opto has ported it.
Post reply on HN