Ask HN: New Programming Language?
31–40 of 99 posts
Re: Ask HN: New Programming Language?
#32My wish list is a little more pedestrian: 1. High level like python, but strongly typed 2. "normal" c style syntax 3. First class support for "green thread" style concurrency, like erlang 4. First class support for dataframes and the best of python's various ML/data packages. 5. A really great ORM well integrated into the language, that can handle elastic and nosql as well as sql. 6. A batteries included web solution…
Re: Ask HN: New Programming Language?
#33Combine the speed benefits of C++ with the freedom of lisp. I don't think it's possible.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nim_(programming_language)#Des...
Re: Ask HN: New Programming Language?
#34Gods no. No more. We already have hundreds (if not thousands) of programming languages for pretty much every niche out there (not to mention languages so flexible they can be adapted to meet any new niche). What this kind of question tells me is that folks are tired of solving business cases, and long for technical challenges. There's nothing inherently wrong with this longing, but we have enough programming language…
Re: Ask HN: New Programming Language?
#35I would like to enjoy writing Go as much as I enjoy writing Ruby. But Ruby apps are slow and hard to deploy. Combining their strengths would be great IMHO.
Re: Ask HN: New Programming Language?
#36Gods no. No more. We already have hundreds (if not thousands) of programming languages for pretty much every niche out there (not to mention languages so flexible they can be adapted to meet any new niche). What this kind of question tells me is that folks are tired of solving business cases, and long for technical challenges. There's nothing inherently wrong with this longing, but we have enough programming language…
Re: Ask HN: New Programming Language?
#37Re: Ask HN: New Programming Language?
#38I want a programming language that can do a lot, from web, game and IoT, with type system like Haskell/TypeScript/Rust/Ocaml and simplicity of Go
So far, Rust...
> with type system like Haskell/TypeScript/Rust/Ocaml
Still Rust...
> and simplicity of Go
As long as that's ”for similar tasks” and anywhere outside of Go’s particular sweet spots, AFAICT, that's still Rust...
Re: Ask HN: New Programming Language?
#39If someone would combine the syntax of Ruby (it's fun to read and write) with the performance and static binaries of Go, I think it would be very popular. I would like to enjoy writing Go as much as I enjoy writing Ruby. But Ruby apps are slow and hard to deploy. Combining their strengths would be great IMHO.
Re: Ask HN: New Programming Language?
#40If someone would combine the syntax of Ruby (it's fun to read and write) with the performance and static binaries of Go, I think it would be very popular. I would like to enjoy writing Go as much as I enjoy writing Ruby. But Ruby apps are slow and hard to deploy. Combining their strengths would be great IMHO.