My RSS reader service also provides an email address for email-only subscriptions: https://feedbin.com/blog/2016/02/03/subscribe-to-email-newsl... . I read email newsletters in the same place as RSS. I'm subscribed to a few low-volume Twitter searches too ( https://feedbin.com/blog/2018/01/11/feedbin-is-the-best-way-... ).
Ask HN: Is it just me, or is the inbox is the worst place for newsletters?
31–40 of 111 posts
Re: Ask HN: Is it just me, or is the inbox is the worst place for newsletters?
#32It's a source of power.
If they don't have your email, then they can't contact you in the future if the platform decides to kick them out.
Re: Ask HN: Is it just me, or is the inbox is the worst place for newsletters?
#33Anyway, can't use Facebook/IG/Reddit/Twitter because of the algorithm.
Can't email more than 4 times a year due to spam filters. I still pay hundreds of dollars a year to reach people via email octopus and Amazon.... And it still goes to Gmail spam.
This is not the internet I grew up with.
Re: Ask HN: Is it just me, or is the inbox is the worst place for newsletters?
#34I'm on the other side of the issue. I have 10000 subscribers with a 0.6% Spam rate. That's technically high, despite me getting all emails voluntarily and not even offering a freebie for signing up. Anyway, can't use Facebook/IG/Reddit/Twitter because of the algorithm. Can't email more than 4 times a year due to spam filters. I still pay hundreds of dollars a year to reach people via email octopus and Amazon.... And…
Re: Ask HN: Is it just me, or is the inbox is the worst place for newsletters?
#35My RSS reader service also provides an email address for email-only subscriptions: https://feedbin.com/blog/2016/02/03/subscribe-to-email-newsl... . I read email newsletters in the same place as RSS. I'm subscribed to a few low-volume Twitter searches too ( https://feedbin.com/blog/2018/01/11/feedbin-is-the-best-way-... ).
The only issue I had once was a newsletter provider who required you to reply to an email to confirm you wanted to subscribe (which of course you can’t do as it’s only for incoming emails), but I contacted the newsletter owner and was approved manually.
Re: Ask HN: Is it just me, or is the inbox is the worst place for newsletters?
#36I didn't like it at first, but after comparing in depth with Gmail and Superhuman I prefer the workflow. Having separate interfaces for communications, feeds, and automated emails has been great.
Re: Ask HN: Is it just me, or is the inbox is the worst place for newsletters?
#37Unfortunately some newsletters are tied to my user account and my main email address for some services, so I had to do an email forward rule in Gmail for those for them to skip my inbox.
Re: Ask HN: Is it just me, or is the inbox is the worst place for newsletters?
#38Re: Ask HN: Is it just me, or is the inbox is the worst place for newsletters?
#39I'm on the other side of the issue. I have 10000 subscribers with a 0.6% Spam rate. That's technically high, despite me getting all emails voluntarily and not even offering a freebie for signing up. Anyway, can't use Facebook/IG/Reddit/Twitter because of the algorithm. Can't email more than 4 times a year due to spam filters. I still pay hundreds of dollars a year to reach people via email octopus and Amazon.... And…
Re: Ask HN: Is it just me, or is the inbox is the worst place for newsletters?
#40I'm on the other side of the issue. I have 10000 subscribers with a 0.6% Spam rate. That's technically high, despite me getting all emails voluntarily and not even offering a freebie for signing up. Anyway, can't use Facebook/IG/Reddit/Twitter because of the algorithm. Can't email more than 4 times a year due to spam filters. I still pay hundreds of dollars a year to reach people via email octopus and Amazon.... And…
How is it that you're limited to 4x/year whereas many vendors will happily send me marketing email once a week without issue?
It seems you can either email occasionally or email weekly. The current system is not set up for monthly emails.
My content takes weeks to produce.
I'm also a bit skeptical that Gmail treats all domains equal. I imagine HBO/Joann Fabrics/etc... has a deal to spam people, where I do not.