Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Is it just me, or is the inbox is the worst place for newsletters?

news.ycombinator.com

31–40 of 111 posts

Re: Ask HN: Is it just me, or is the inbox is the worst place for newsletters?

#31

My RSS reader service also provides an email address for email-only subscriptions: https://feedbin.com/blog/2016/02/03/subscribe-to-email-newsl... . I read email newsletters in the same place as RSS. I'm subscribed to a few low-volume Twitter searches too ( https://feedbin.com/blog/2018/01/11/feedbin-is-the-best-way-... ).

I do the same thing with Feedbin. It's delightful.

Re: Ask HN: Is it just me, or is the inbox is the worst place for newsletters?

#32
Newsletters use email because it's much more likely to stay operational for longer into the future than any other random web service.

It's a source of power.

If they don't have your email, then they can't contact you in the future if the platform decides to kick them out.

Re: Ask HN: Is it just me, or is the inbox is the worst place for newsletters?

#33
I'm on the other side of the issue. I have 10000 subscribers with a 0.6% Spam rate. That's technically high, despite me getting all emails voluntarily and not even offering a freebie for signing up.

Anyway, can't use Facebook/IG/Reddit/Twitter because of the algorithm.

Can't email more than 4 times a year due to spam filters. I still pay hundreds of dollars a year to reach people via email octopus and Amazon.... And it still goes to Gmail spam.

This is not the internet I grew up with.

Re: Ask HN: Is it just me, or is the inbox is the worst place for newsletters?

#34

I'm on the other side of the issue. I have 10000 subscribers with a 0.6% Spam rate. That's technically high, despite me getting all emails voluntarily and not even offering a freebie for signing up. Anyway, can't use Facebook/IG/Reddit/Twitter because of the algorithm. Can't email more than 4 times a year due to spam filters. I still pay hundreds of dollars a year to reach people via email octopus and Amazon.... And…

How is it that you're limited to 4x/year whereas many vendors will happily send me marketing email once a week without issue?

Re: Ask HN: Is it just me, or is the inbox is the worst place for newsletters?

#35

My RSS reader service also provides an email address for email-only subscriptions: https://feedbin.com/blog/2016/02/03/subscribe-to-email-newsl... . I read email newsletters in the same place as RSS. I'm subscribed to a few low-volume Twitter searches too ( https://feedbin.com/blog/2018/01/11/feedbin-is-the-best-way-... ).

+1 for sending newsletters to Feedbin. It’s a great feature.

The only issue I had once was a newsletter provider who required you to reply to an email to confirm you wanted to subscribe (which of course you can’t do as it’s only for incoming emails), but I contacted the newsletter owner and was approved manually.

Re: Ask HN: Is it just me, or is the inbox is the worst place for newsletters?

#36
I recently switched to https://www.hey.com/ for email, which provides a dedicated page for reading newsletters.

I didn't like it at first, but after comparing in depth with Gmail and Superhuman I prefer the workflow. Having separate interfaces for communications, feeds, and automated emails has been great.

Re: Ask HN: Is it just me, or is the inbox is the worst place for newsletters?

#37
I use an email address provided by Inoreader to get all my newsletters along my RSS feeds.

Unfortunately some newsletters are tied to my user account and my main email address for some services, so I had to do an email forward rule in Gmail for those for them to skip my inbox.

Re: Ask HN: Is it just me, or is the inbox is the worst place for newsletters?

#39

I'm on the other side of the issue. I have 10000 subscribers with a 0.6% Spam rate. That's technically high, despite me getting all emails voluntarily and not even offering a freebie for signing up. Anyway, can't use Facebook/IG/Reddit/Twitter because of the algorithm. Can't email more than 4 times a year due to spam filters. I still pay hundreds of dollars a year to reach people via email octopus and Amazon.... And…

I'm curious: how do you learn your spam rate?

Re: Ask HN: Is it just me, or is the inbox is the worst place for newsletters?

#40
post #34

I'm on the other side of the issue. I have 10000 subscribers with a 0.6% Spam rate. That's technically high, despite me getting all emails voluntarily and not even offering a freebie for signing up. Anyway, can't use Facebook/IG/Reddit/Twitter because of the algorithm. Can't email more than 4 times a year due to spam filters. I still pay hundreds of dollars a year to reach people via email octopus and Amazon.... And…

How is it that you're limited to 4x/year whereas many vendors will happily send me marketing email once a week without issue?

If you are bombarded with emails, you either unsubscribe or you let them keep coming. Even if lots of people mark as spam, the number of emails not marked as spam greatly outnumber the spam emails.

It seems you can either email occasionally or email weekly. The current system is not set up for monthly emails.

My content takes weeks to produce.

I'm also a bit skeptical that Gmail treats all domains equal. I imagine HBO/Joann Fabrics/etc... has a deal to spam people, where I do not.

Post reply on HN