Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Should I quit graduate school to avoid a bad advisor?

news.ycombinator.com

31–40 of 47 posts

Re: Ask HN: Should I quit graduate school to avoid a bad advisor?

#31
This conversation might be more helpful if you had it with other faculty, particularly the Director of Graduate Studies, in your department. In general, Departments want their graduate students to graduate (statistics on graduation rate are used to justify training grants), and to be successful in their later careers. And Director's of Graduate Studies have a useful historical perspective; they may know that your advisor has had a history of problems, or that your situation is unusual and bears looking into.

There are almost certainly resources in your Department to support you and help you with your decision. You should explore them.

You should also understand that you can ask for letters from other people in your department, in particular from your thesis committee. While it is not ideal, it is not unheard of for students to provide letters that do not include their advisor. The more you interact with other faculty, the better in your situation.

Re: Ask HN: Should I quit graduate school to avoid a bad advisor?

#32
Find a different advisor now (possibly at a different school). One that has a proven track record of graduating students (which sounds hollow, but think of it this way, would MIT be a good school if only 50% of their students found jobs after graduation?).

There is a point where your advisor will look at you as a failure and give up on their responsibility of tutelage. Most of the time, this is not the students fault (assuming that you are hardworking and proposing your own ideas). Most likely, the advisor is putting undo burden upon you (does he have a history of pushing out students?). Saying that you have 3 years left is not true, since the advisor can hold you in servitude much longer with little recourse.

Re: Ask HN: Should I quit graduate school to avoid a bad advisor?

#33
You don't mention (a) your reason for pursuing a PhD / what you plan to do after grad school, (b) what you've achieved so far in the past 3 years, or (c) your field of study. Without at least that information, it would be very difficult for anybody to advise you here.

> I don't have many references because, I'm in graduate school.

That's not a valid reason. Networking takes work, and you should start now. I can't stress that enough.

> he won't leave a good word in for me for anyone who contacts him as a reference

If he's as bad as you say, his reference might not carry a lot of weight anyway. If you're set on pursuing an academic career, moving to a professor who does good science and has a good reputation might be worth another couple years in the long run.

> it's too late to switch groups without wasting an additional 3 years

In my experience, this isn't necessarily true. You may find an advisor who won't completely ignore the work you've already done (unless you have nothing to show for the last three years). Some people here advise you to meet with other professors and "explain the situation." Be extremely careful how you explain the situation, and don't disparage your current advisor.

Re: Ask HN: Should I quit graduate school to avoid a bad advisor?

#34

If this is for a Ph.D. you likely should leave for other reasons. To understand why I say this, navigate to "Career Guide for Engineers and Computer Scientists" by Philip Greenspun http://philip.greenspun.com/careers/ Examine the graph at the bottom of that page.

As the page says, it isn't serious. But more than that there isn't even an ounce of truth in it, so I don't see what the joke is at all. Computer science has many extremely well paying, and simultaneously satisfying and intellectually rewarding jobs, for PhDs in industry. There are some more serious articles linked above the silly graph, but they're not about computer science, and they're not about this decade.

the crazy thing is while I agree with your statement about CS PhDs, the greenspun article really hit home (I'm a chem PhD). In chem and bio, there's a lot of pressure to get hands on a project, so more students are trained than there are jobs for them when things get out. There's even a term for this "postdocapalypse". We don't know what field OP is in.

Re: Ask HN: Should I quit graduate school to avoid a bad advisor?

#36
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I agree with your advice except for this > line ... you won't get any extra credit > for putting up with a bad adviser. The value doesn't lie in putting up with a bad advisor, it lies in taking control and organising things. It lies in being in a bad situation and devising a plan to deal with it. It lies in solving a problem, accomplishing a goal, despite starting from a poor situation. The value is in having proof…

It's a big achievement, of course. But on your CV? No. I fail to see how you could convey the lengths you went to in dealing with a bad adviser in a brief, tactful way on a CV. Nor would I want to; seems like it could easily backfire.

Exactly. Replace "advisor" with "boss", and see how it works out. It might be a good life experience for the OP, but putting it on a CV? No way. I wouldn't even mention in conversation the true explanation for quitting or switching advisors, unless it were a close friend who was genuinely interested in hearing the details --- for anyone else, a generic, "we had different artistic visions".

Re: Ask HN: Should I quit graduate school to avoid a bad advisor?

#37
I recently finished my PhD and had a terrible relationship with my "advisor"---who left part of the way through to start a startup doing the exact same thing he had brought me on to do (except I was not invited). I don't have any continuing contact with him and I certainly don't list him as a reference on my CV (nor did he help me make any useful connections before he ditched his lab group). In a difficult situation like that, what kept me going as what amounted to a self-advised graduate student for almost five years was that I enjoyed the work I was doing. If that intrinsic motivation was not there, I would not have finished---or if I had, it would not have been very meaningful: why get a PhD studying something I wasn't fully enjoying and engaged by?

I have watched enough graduate students "stick with it" non-enthusiastically and it doesn't usually work out well. I hate to be black-and-white, and I don't think it's as black-and-white as I'm about to put it, but either you love the work and nothing can keep you from it (or something close to that), or you should leave the PhD program (and there's nothing wrong with that!). I think PhDs do not really made to reward folks who don't fully enjoy the work they are doing, because often the post-graduation prospects are "pay a big price to keep doing your research" or "do something else".

Granted, I don't know much of your situation, so take the advice for what it's worth, but I hope that what I've written here is helpful.

Re: Ask HN: Should I quit graduate school to avoid a bad advisor?

#38
[Without the benefit of both sides of the story, am assuming the advisor is truly bad.]

I was in your shoes, and I didn't leave my advisor. I greatly regret that. I stayed because I felt ethically obliged to, and because I am non-confrontational. I made a big mistake. Even trying to change advisors (within the same university) seemed awkward. And it would indeed have been too awkward and difficult to pull off. I should have just quit.

Five years from now, each of your present-day years will seem much more valuable than it does now. One of your years now has much more leverage now than it will five years from now. Do not waste years on a bad advisor. It sounds like this is the perfect time -- you say you expect another 3 years, which suggests you're 2 or 3 years in right now. One more year, and your identity will get too strongly coupled with your advisor's.

If you're in CS and taking up a CS job, there will not be an expectation of a reference from your advisor, if you can position these 3 years as an extended Masters. Get other references, and be honest but diplomatic about your advisor if asked.

Re: Ask HN: Should I quit graduate school to avoid a bad advisor?

#39
You begin by saying you're eager to quit, so I will take that as your true desire, and those first five words are enough to advise you to quit. Nothing in your query suggests that you are enjoying the work or look forward to continuing in the field. Given the negative sentiment and the lack of positive sentiments, the case seems quite clear. Quit, and get on with your life. Chalk the past three years up to experience, and set about enjoying the next three years and the years after. Life is short, after all. Find the thing you love and are good at, and don't worry about the fact that you didn't finish this PhD.

Re: Ask HN: Should I quit graduate school to avoid a bad advisor?

#40
If you think you are wasting your time, you need to leave. Three years is a long time to spend on something where you see little benefit. The question you have to ask yourself is: "What are you going to do with your degree after you graduate?" If your answer is, "I don't know," then it's probably time to quit and form another plan, and it really sounds like this is possibly the case. If you aren't learning from your adviser, that's three years of you falling behind all the other candidates who you are going to compete with to get the job you want.

Realistically consider for a moment how many people graduate with an advanced degree in your field vs. how many jobs there actually are.

Post reply on HN