Consider Imagga. http://imagga.com/
Ask HN: Microsoft Computer Vision API or Google Cloud Vision API?
31–40 of 52 posts
Re: Ask HN: Microsoft Computer Vision API or Google Cloud Vision API?
#32OpenCV includes face detection, and given a reasonably limited corpus of faces, it performs quite well and quite reliably. (Whether you want to use that or use a service depends on how close to your core business this is.)
Re: Ask HN: Microsoft Computer Vision API or Google Cloud Vision API?
#33We also offer finding similar images as well as image search capabilities apart from finding tags from images. Please connect at https://twitter.com/adityapatadia to discuss further.
Re: Ask HN: Microsoft Computer Vision API or Google Cloud Vision API?
#34EDIT: I see Google Cloud Vision has landmark detection, that might be useful if the API returns the GPS coordinates of the landmark.
Re: Ask HN: Microsoft Computer Vision API or Google Cloud Vision API?
#35Re: Ask HN: Microsoft Computer Vision API or Google Cloud Vision API?
#36As you mentioned faces:
Are you looking for face detection or recognition? Face detection has been robustly solved before the advent of DL with HAARs/ face models. Now being pushed a bit further with DL.
(http://docs.opencv.org/master/d7/d8b/tutorial_py_face_detect...)
Current cutting edge face recognition systems rely on DL, and the top performing models are one out of Russia (NTechLAB, facenx_large) and one from Google (FaceNet v8). These were the top two performers in the MegaFace challenge - identification with 1M distractors. Truly remarkable results. http://megaface.cs.washington.edu/results/
As with most DL systems you will need a massive corpus of labeled faces (aka, google or vkontakte - which the NTechLab group used)
Re: Ask HN: Microsoft Computer Vision API or Google Cloud Vision API?
#37It really depends what you are attempting to accomplish, and what you wish to detect in the images. As you mentioned faces: Are you looking for face detection or recognition? Face detection has been robustly solved before the advent of DL with HAARs/ face models. Now being pushed a bit further with DL. ( http://docs.opencv.org/master/d7/d8b/tutorial_py_face_detect... ) Current cutting edge face recognition systems re…
Re: Ask HN: Microsoft Computer Vision API or Google Cloud Vision API?
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
So I tried Microsoft's CV & IBM's AlchemyVision on the same image (since they both have an online demo sandbox). The Microsoft just gave me back more labels and stronger sentiment figures for same labels. Hence narrowed it down to these 2.
If you tried the Watson vision offering when it was "AlchemyVision" then you may have tried a now out-of-date version of the service. The AlchemyVision and Visual Recognition tiles on Bluemix have recently been combined in a way that utilizes their complementary strengths. Consider retrying the updated service if you'd like! Disclosure: I work at IBM Watson.
qq - Is the API stabalized, by which I mean will there be further changes/merges?
Re: Ask HN: Microsoft Computer Vision API or Google Cloud Vision API?
#39Re: Ask HN: Microsoft Computer Vision API or Google Cloud Vision API?
#40Is there a publicly accessible API that can geocode photos, to a degree of accuracy? I'd like to be able to decorate digital photos taken before geocoding was a thing with geo data. I figure photos I have taken off St. Marks Square in Venice have probably been taken a million times by other people, some of whom have probably added GPS coordinates to theirs, so a smart CV offering should be able to figure it out to a…
For example, if I shoot with my non-GPS-enabled DSLR, those images are uploaded to Google Photos, which will reconcile my location history to apply a location to those shots. It'll also do that if it sees DSLR shots in between geotagged cameraphone shots.
But more to your use case, GPhotos will actually recognize landmarks and other information to tag photos, I believe, with a rough location (such that it'll match a location like "Paris" or "Eiffel Tower," but perhaps not lat/long... yet.)
Even more impressive, they're very nearly able to do exactly what you're describing, though my understanding is that it isn't in use in GPhotos yet: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/600889/google-unveils-neu...