Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What was your "oh shit" moment with GenAI?

news.ycombinator.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

291–300 of 1001 posts

Re: Ask HN: What was your "oh shit" moment with GenAI?

#291

Post by itomato »

jzemeocala wrote: post #118

I bought an Alesis QS8.1 super cheap in perfect condition (was a top grade digital piano/synth in the 90s). and then i realized that ALL of the software (which i collected from defunct websites and archived on github) related to it was ancient and after a while of getting tired of using WINE every single time i decided i wanted a cross platform modern equivalent that did everything that several of these different pro…

While not the "oh shit" moment, the wave has the same shape.

I have an DigiTech GNX3000 effects pedal board - a digital modeling "workstation" that needs the aged Windows native software or Gdigi to make the most of.

At best, the experience with gdigi was passable; raw access to the patches and controls, the ability to control it from the laptop, etc.

In an hour or so, I had a functionally superior webmidi version up and running in Vercel using their v0 code. It kicked off a wave of subscriptions and referral chasing.

I made it a template - because there are so many gnx3k users out there: https://v0.app/templates/digitech-gnx3000-sysex-tool-GC5LzXA...

Re: Ask HN: What was your "oh shit" moment with GenAI?

#293

Post by AussieWog93 »

calf wrote: post #282
AussieWog93 wrote: post #268

Literally just last night I have Claude Code the following prompt, verbatim: "Whenever I launch Kodi on my Chromecast 4k, it crashes. I think this is related to a plugin or skin. It goes away for a bit if I clear cache but will eventually come back. Can you connect to the device via adb (I've run adb connect already), and debug exactly where it's crashing? Once you've done that, propose a solution. If this requires d…

That's amazing, as someone who struggles to find something useful to do with LLMs. How long does this take, several minutes or more? Do you need a paid version of Claude Code for this?

It sat there for about half an hour working out the problem, step by step, before asking me for the preferred solution. At one point, it was trying to decompile the .APK, so I interrupted it and reminded it that Kodi was open source - it was welcome to clone from GitHub.

The only other feedback I gave it mid-process was wrong (I said that the crash probably wasn't caused by cache trimming, it ran some additional tests to confirm that its hunch about cache trimming was right).

This was with the paid version of Claude Code (I don't think they offer a free version at all; that's a Codex thing). The $20 version is as smart as the $200 one, but once you work out it can do stuff like this you'll quickly burn the $20 token limit. :)

The other thing that helps is a CLAUDE.md file - authored of course by Claude itself. Mine's here: https://github.com/EspoTek/.claude/blob/master/CLAUDE.md A lot of it is probably domain-specific for the stuff I do, but the "Working with unfamiliar data or systems" section is bloody gold! Stopped the bullshit completely!

Re: Ask HN: What was your "oh shit" moment with GenAI?

#295

Post by koreth1 »

For me it was Suno, not any of the coding tools. I prompted it to write a song about my family's little dog, told it a few things about the dog, and it came back with a K-pop-style anthem that had a super catchy melody and lyrics that made my wife and me laugh out loud.

Writing code to spec is one thing, but creating art was always supposed to be what separated us from machines. (I suppose I need to preemptively acknowledge the "it was machine-generated so by definition cannot be art" point of view.)

Re: Ask HN: What was your "oh shit" moment with GenAI?

#296

Post by tejohnso »

I didn't have a slightly panicked moment, but sometime in the last year my approach to programming changed.

When starting a project, I used to think about how I was going to structure it, how the large pieces would interact, how some of the details would work out, and then I'd work through alternatives and consequences on my own.

Now I don't think about it on my own so much as have a conversation with an LLM about it. And it's great because it can quickly gather information from various sources, I can ask it for links to canonical sources, I can ask it about trade-offs between alternatives that I might not have considered, and through conversation, I end up with a more detailed analysis.

Then as I work through the development, I keep my new agent partner in the loop for discussion, suggestions, and troubleshooting. It can't be trusted completely, but it's certainly reliable enough to be considered a useful tool for my purposes.

I went from thinking it was an interesting toy to play around with, to completely integrating it into my work flow, and that change seems to have happened very quickly.

Re: Ask HN: What was your "oh shit" moment with GenAI?

#297

Post by dnnddidiej »

1. ChatGPT first public release (I am not one who saw early GPT models) I think late 2023 iirc?

Why? Turing test bye bye.

2. Opus 4.6 w. Claude Code - not the model in partucular but happened to be when I started seriously trying to vibe code at home, as I saw all the hype on Linkedin. Yes linkedin sucks but it is somewhat a barometer. Around early this year.

Why? Knocking up decent enough web apps so quickly.

Re: Ask HN: What was your "oh shit" moment with GenAI?

#298

Post by hatthew »

I'm kinda of surprised that so many here on HN were dismissive/unaware of the capabilities and potential in the DALL-E days and earlier. I feel like this is the sort of forum where most people would be both aware of advancements and aware of their potential.

My moment was GANs and GPT-2 back in 2019. I feel like that's where computer-generated media went from "obviously fake" to "sometimes can be mistaken as real." RLHF for LLMs and diffusion for image generation are both important improvements, but I feel like they aren't fundamental prerequisites for they type of stuff we have today. I think the main advancements since then are just marginal improvements, larger models/datasets, and better surrounding tooling.

Post reply on HN