Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What are you thankful for?

news.ycombinator.com

291–300 of 304 posts

Re: Ask HN: What are you thankful for?

#291
post #244

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I opted out of organ donation in a country which enables it by default. Looking at it from an evolutionary point of view, I don't see any good in it, sorry.

Confused. You think organ donation is bad because it saves lives that should end for the sake of...maybe a slightly stronger species? Do you disagree with the practice of medicine in general or something?

Everything not curative.

Re: Ask HN: What are you thankful for?

#292

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I opted out of organ donation in a country which enables it by default. Looking at it from an evolutionary point of view, I don't see any good in it, sorry.

Do you also abstain from - hospitals - medicine - glasses / other similar implements - any other human altering measures? We closed the door on natural evolution a long time ago. Most of us are already cyborgs with our phones and computers. Any future evolution will be done by us (I.e. more advanced cyborgs cyborgs / genetic modification).

Everything not curative for a problem that doesn't let you live without treatment is an aberration. Since organ donation is not saving people, but enabling to be dependent on donations every 10 years and immunosuppressants in between (except for cornea transplants), I don't want to enable it.

The much anticipated collapse will apply those sort of rules soon enough anyways.

Re: Ask HN: What are you thankful for?

#294
post #121

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Great, it really sucks that people on work visas can basically be threatened with deportations by their employers like this because of all the ways unemployment can go wrong. Good look with the new job :)

It also sucks for locals because some corps will strongly preference people on work visas since they basically own the employees.

I don't think you want to work in a place like this. Maybe they're doing you a favor if you think of it

Re: Ask HN: What are you thankful for?

#295

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It also sucks for locals because some corps will strongly preference people on work visas since they basically own the employees.

Is it possible that at some point someone in your family tree was preferred for employment due to their immigration, or perhaps other status, which created opportunities that brought you to where you are today?

No, my ancestors were very likely somewhat involved in the violent takeover of Australia.

Re: Ask HN: What are you thankful for?

#296
I'm thankful to my God who has bestowed love in the heart of my parents, siblings, relatives and friends because of which I'm what I'm today. Their compassion, support, up bringing and timely suggestions/warnings etc.

I'm thankful to them all!

"If one is not thankful to people around him, he can't be thankful to his God"

So thank you everyone.

Re: Ask HN: What are you thankful for?

#297

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you also abstain from - hospitals - medicine - glasses / other similar implements - any other human altering measures? We closed the door on natural evolution a long time ago. Most of us are already cyborgs with our phones and computers. Any future evolution will be done by us (I.e. more advanced cyborgs cyborgs / genetic modification).

Everything not curative for a problem that doesn't let you live without treatment is an aberration. Since organ donation is not saving people, but enabling to be dependent on donations every 10 years and immunosuppressants in between (except for cornea transplants), I don't want to enable it. The much anticipated collapse will apply those sort of rules soon enough anyways.

... glasses would fall under that scope.

It's not helpful to still be thinking in such antiquated ways like evolution through the fittest survivors. Humans have not done that for quite a long time, in pretty much every facet of our society you can find that.

As I said, genetic modification and cyber augmentation will be how we evolve moving forward. Advances in medicine has (and will) make worrying about evolution a headscratcher.

> Since organ donation is not saving people,

[Citation Needed]. I would imagine there's many cases, such as accidents, where someone would need an organ and then be perfectly fine afterwards.

Re: Ask HN: What are you thankful for?

#298

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Everything not curative for a problem that doesn't let you live without treatment is an aberration. Since organ donation is not saving people, but enabling to be dependent on donations every 10 years and immunosuppressants in between (except for cornea transplants), I don't want to enable it. The much anticipated collapse will apply those sort of rules soon enough anyways.

... glasses would fall under that scope. It's not helpful to still be thinking in such antiquated ways like evolution through the fittest survivors. Humans have not done that for quite a long time, in pretty much every facet of our society you can find that. As I said, genetic modification and cyber augmentation will be how we evolve moving forward. Advances in medicine has (and will) make worrying about evolution a…

Its hubris to imagine that evolution stops. Mating opportunities are controlled by different things for humans vs fish for example. But don't imagine they aren't there, and guiding our species' development.

Homo Sapiens has evolved more in the last 50,000 years, than in the 1M before that. Because of civilization.

Re: Ask HN: What are you thankful for?

#299

Earlier quoted context omitted.

... glasses would fall under that scope. It's not helpful to still be thinking in such antiquated ways like evolution through the fittest survivors. Humans have not done that for quite a long time, in pretty much every facet of our society you can find that. As I said, genetic modification and cyber augmentation will be how we evolve moving forward. Advances in medicine has (and will) make worrying about evolution a…

Its hubris to imagine that evolution stops. Mating opportunities are controlled by different things for humans vs fish for example. But don't imagine they aren't there, and guiding our species' development. Homo Sapiens has evolved more in the last 50,000 years, than in the 1M before that. Because of civilization.

Random mutations are always going to exist. For the third time, future evolution is going to be directly caused -by us-, on shorter timescales. Because the alternative is letting humans die simply for the sake of evolution.
Post reply on HN