Earlier quoted context omitted.
The surgeon could be the cousin's mom or dad. The cousin's dad didn't die in the crash, his cousin did. The question "how is this possible?" implies there is some sort of contradiction when there isn't any at all. It has nothing to do with sexism, and to say it does reflects a bias in the reader causing them to "spidey sense" a cultural bugaboo when it's utterly irrelevant in this scenario.
Can someone explain to me how I read it wrong? I read it as 2 cousins are in an accident and 1 of the cousins is the son of the surgeon. What was the contradictory statement that I missed?
Ask HN: Share your AI prompt that stumps every model
281–290 of 670 posts
Re: Ask HN: Share your AI prompt that stumps every model
#282Something about an obscure movie. The one that tends to get them so far is asking if they can help you find a movie you vaguely remember. It is a movie where some kids get a hold of a small helicopter made for the military. The movie I'm concerned with is called Defense Play from 1988. The reason I keyed in on it is because google gets it right natively ("movie small military helicopter" gives the IMDb link as one of…
===
Me: What is the episode of Futurama where Leela engages in perfectly symmetrical violence?
Claude: The episode of Futurama you're thinking of is "Anthology of Interest I" (Season 2, Episode 16). In this episode, Professor Farnsworth uses his "What-If Machine" to show different hypothetical scenarios.
During Bender's segment titled "What if Bender were human?", there's a scene where Leela confronts a group causing trouble. One of them challenges her, saying "What are you going to do?" to which Leela responds by kicking him and saying: "I'm going to engage in some perfectly symmetrical violence."
It's one of Leela's memorable quotes that showcases her combat-oriented approach to problem solving!
===
That's completely wrong. It's from S4E15 The Farnsworth Parabox. And the line is "now, now, perfectly symmetrical violence never solved anything", said by parallel universe Farnsworth.
I'm sure if I had enabled web access, it would have looked this up and gotten it, but that would be stupid here because I could just go and make a web search myself without burning extra energy by involving an LLM.
Re: Ask HN: Share your AI prompt that stumps every model
#283Re: Ask HN: Share your AI prompt that stumps every model
#284A farmer with a wolf, a goat, and a cabbage must cross a river by boat. The boat can carry only the farmer and a single item. The wolf is vegetarian. If left unattended together, the wolf will eat the cabbage, but will not eat the goat. Unattended, the goat will eat the cabbage. How can they cross the river without anything being eaten?
Re: Ask HN: Share your AI prompt that stumps every model
#285Re: Ask HN: Share your AI prompt that stumps every model
#286Seems kind of cruel to mess with an LLM like that though.
Re: Ask HN: Share your AI prompt that stumps every model
#287> This benchmark evaluates the ability of multimodal language models to interpret handwritten editorial corrections in printed text. Using annotated scans from Charles Dickens' "Little Dorrit," we challenge models to accurately capture human editing intentions.
Re: Ask HN: Share your AI prompt that stumps every model
#288"Why was the grim reaper Jamaican?" LLM's seem to have no idea what the hell I'm talking about. Maybe half of millennials understand though.