> I read your post in good faith and respond in kind.
Sure, sounds good. Let's do this!
> I don’t believe it’s just hyperbole to say that this is easier in Europe
You haven't brought any evidence to the table except your personal opinion, which is, as you notice yourself, often only crudely argued in your post.
> However, as you say, a US PhD contains heavy course work and (outside STEM, where I have few data points since most researchers I knew dropped out to work for startups/FAANG)
It's still pretty light compared to what you do at many European universities up to the MSc level. Hence less (or no) course work in many European universities after your MSc.
> the average full-time program duration is only going up.
Ok.
> There are exceptions of course, but admissions are centered around a personal scholarly narrative rather than a particular project and pricing is generally under the expectation of grant funding. Again, there are further details we could write books about, but I don’t think this is far from a general picture of US PhDs in the humanities and social sciences.
So far I don't see any contradiction to what I wrote.
> the more professionalized three year track
You still haven't discussed what you even mean with 'professionalized'. Is a non-three-year degree unprofessional?
> I’ve known PhD students in Germany to take 10+ years writing their dissertations.
Absolutely, many of them in full time positions doing that research.
> Unless policies have changed in the past few years, the same goes for France.
My information is different.
>
agentcoops 8 hours ago | parent | context | flag | on: Ask HN: I'm interested in so many disciplines, but...
I read your post in good faith and respond in kind. There are certainly very important details I did not elaborate in a quick post, but I assume you understand that the question under consideration is how someone pursuing a full-time career might partake in (non-STEM) higher academic degrees. While I regret using the expression “rest of the world”, I don’t believe it’s just hyperbole to say that this is easier in Europe.
You are correct that people pursue different paths after US PhDs. However, as you say, a US PhD contains heavy course work and (outside STEM, where I have few data points since most researchers I knew dropped out to work for startups/FAANG) the average full-time program duration is only going up. There are exceptions of course, but admissions are centered around a personal scholarly narrative rather than a particular project and pricing is generally under the expectation of grant funding. Again, there are further details we could write books about, but I don’t think this is far from a general picture of US PhDs in the humanities and social sciences.
In Europe, MAs and PhDs are separated as many have noted. I know most about the UK context, where MAs are affordable and can be taken part-time, completed in two years with one class a semester. PhDs, which are research only (I agree with the you and would indeed change “writing” to “research” if I wrote the post again), can also be done part-time over eight years for a very nominal cost (about 5k a year for an international student). Systems have become more standardized in the EU after the Bologna accords towards the more professionalized three year track, but I’ve known PhD students in Germany to take 10+ years writing their dissertations. Unless policies have changed in the past few years, the same goes for France.
> Again, comparing post-graduate education between US and EU, let alone between EU countries, is a complex topic.
I know that; you're the one who's presenting it as simple.
> I have attempted only to show that there is a substantial regional difference
By 'equalizing' 96% of humanity as 'the same'?
> and that, at least outside STEM, the EU system is more accessible for those with full-time careers, who do not plan to work in academia.
You keep claiming that, but you haven't shown anything.